Skip to content

· Private foundation

Louis & Josie Forchheimer Memorial Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$570k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$171k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$1.5MReligion$1.3MPhilanthropy$835kEducation$418kHuman Services$219k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$56,987
Median grant
5
States reached
$8.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPRINGHILL AVENUE TEMPLE ATTN DAVID ROSE$170,962
UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWEST ALABAMA$113,975
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$56,987
MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME B'NAI B'RITH HOME &$56,987
REGENTS -UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO CU$56,987
DIABETIC CLINIC OF MOBILE INC$56,987
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$56,987
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $58k → 14%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $51k → 16%SPRINGHILL AVENUE TEMPLE ATTN DAVID ROSE: $173k → 19%MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME B'NAI B'RITH HOME &: $58k → 17%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $58k → 8%REGENTS -UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO CU: $58k → 12%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $57k → 14%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $50k → 16%SPRINGHILL AVENUE TEMPLE ATTN DAVID ROSE: $171k → 19%MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME B'NAI B'RITH HOME &: $57k → 17%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $57k → 8%REGENTS -UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO CU: $57k → 12%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $53k → 14%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $49k → 16%SPRINGHILL AVENUE TEMPLE ATTN DAVID ROSE: $159k → 19%MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME B'NAI B'RITH HOME &: $53k → 17%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $53k → 8%REGENTS -UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO CU: $53k → 12%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $52k → 14%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $48k → 16%SPRINGHILL AVENUE TEMPLE ATTN DAVID ROSE: $155k → 19%MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME B'NAI B'RITH HOME &: $52k → 17%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $52k → 8%REGENTS -UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO CU: $52k → 12%SPRING HILL AVENUE TEMPLE: $153k → 19%MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME: $51k → 17%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $51k → 12%SPRING HILL AVENUE TEMPLE: $150k → 19%MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME: $50k → 17%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $50k → 12%SPRING HILL AVENUE TEMPLE: $148k → 19%MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME: $49k → 17%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $49k → 12%SPRING HILL AVENUE TEMPLE: $143k → 19%MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME: $48k → 17%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $48k → 12%DIABETIC CLINIC OF MOBILE INC: $58k → 19%DIABETIC CLINIC OF MOBILE INC: $57k → 19%DIABETIC CLINIC OF MOBILE INC: $53k → 19%DIABETIC CLINIC OF MOBILE INC: $52k → 19%DIABETIC CLINIC OF MOBILE INC: $51k → 19%DIABETIC CLINIC OF MOBILE INC: $50k → 19%DIABETIC CLINIC OF MOBILE INC: $49k → 19%DIABETIC CLINIC OF MOBILE INC: $48k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.2M · 11 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
0

Total granted

$4.2M
$0

Still filing today

45%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWEST ALABAMA INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $835k · revenue -12%
  • SA
    SPRINGHILL AVENUE TEMPLE ATTN DAVID ROSE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $658k
  • SH
    SPRING HILL AVENUE TEMPLE
    4× · 2018–2021 · $595k

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    1
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    5/5
    Grantees still filing
    2/5
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    SPRINGHILL AVENUE TEMPLE ATTN DAVID ROSE: $657,720 · OtherSPRINGHILL AVENUE TEMPLE ATTN DAVID ROSESPRING HILL AVENUE TEMPLE: $595,104 · OtherSPRING HILL AVENUE TEMPLEDIABETIC CLINIC OF MOBILE INC: $417,608 · OtherDIABETIC CLINIC OF MOBILE INCMEMPHIS JEWISH HOME B'NAI B'RITH HOME &: $219,240 · OtherMEMPHIS JEWISH HOME B'NAI B'RITH HOME &REGENTS -UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO CU: $219,240 · OtherREGENTS -UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO CUAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $198,368 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INCREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $198,368 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADOUNITED WAY OF SOUTHWEST ALABAMA INC: $835,217 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF SOUTHWES…American Heart Association Inc: $417,608 · HealthAmerican Heart Associa…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $219,240 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIET…B'NAI B'RITH HOME AND HOSPITAL FOR AGED INC (D/B/A MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME & REHAB): $198,368 · HealthB'NAI B'RITH HOME AND …
    Other$2,505,648Philanthropy$835,217Health$835,216

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTHWEST ALABAMA INC: $835,217 over 8y, 4.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $417,608 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDIABETIC CLINIC OF MOBILE INC: $417,608 over 8y, 51% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $219,240 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetB'NAI B'RITH HOME AND HOSPITAL FOR AGED INC (D/B/A MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME & REHAB): $198,368 over 4y, 0.3% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWEST ALABAMA INC ↗
    • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
    • Who funds DIABETIC CLINIC OF MOBILE INC ↗
    • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
    • Who funds B'NAI B'RITH HOME AND HOSPITAL FOR AGED INC (D/B/A MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME & REHAB) ↗

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Louis & Josie Forchheimer Memorial Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Louis & Josie Forchheimer Memorial Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Louis & Josie Forchheimer Memorial’s filings →

      More from the funding graph