Skip to content

· Private foundation

Louis Ancel Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$24kArts & Culture$23kReligion$18kCivil Rights$5kEducation$4kHealth$2kHuman Services$600Public Benefit$600Other$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100
Median grant
9
States reached
$17k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Congregation Agudas Achim$1,200
Jewish Museum Milwaukee$736
Center for Excelence in Education$300
Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin$150
ACLU Foundation$150
Individual grant recipient$150
Southern Poverty Law Center$150
Milwaukee Public Museum$135
Individual grant recipient$120
US Holocaust Memorial Museum$100
MAA$100
Amherst College Fund$100
The Friendship Circle-Milwaukee$93
Discovery World$85
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Student Organ Donation Advocates: $25 → 21%Jewish Family Services: $300 → 17%Jewish Family Services: $100 → 17%Jewish Family Services: $75 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
RI
CA
MO
VA
NC
DC
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$55k · 39 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

39 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
16

Total granted

$55k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+34%

Still filing today

38%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthEducationHuman ServicesCrime & LegalScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $5k · revenue +34%
  • SP
    SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $3k · revenue +10%
  • CF
    Center for Excellence in Education
    8× · 2017–2025 · $3k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • JC
    Jewish Community Foundation
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • SJ
    St Johns on the Lake
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • H
    HIPPY
    one grant, 2017 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
2
Milwaukee Institute of Art & Design Inc

The milwaukee institute of art and design's mission is to ignite curious minds through art, design and service. we value courage to seek our own path, integrity to pursue our lives and work with meaning, kindness to thoughtfully engage…

—
3
Milwaukee Women Inc

Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

Education
4
The Uwm Real Estate Foundation Inc

To partner with the public and private sectors to develop and hold real estate for the benefit of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee. the uwm real estate foundation, inc. holdings may include any properties that advance the mission of…

Housing & Shelter
5
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Mitchell Hamline School of Law

Mitchell hamline school of law is an independent law school that advances its mission through a combination of legal education, public service, and community engagement. it is dedicated to preparing students to practice law, while also…

Education
8
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
9
Marine Biological Laboratory

The Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) is a world-renowned center for biological discovery and training that is notably affiliated with more than 60 Nobel Prize winners. Research is conducted by full-time faculty as well as hundreds of the…

Science & Tech
10
Museum of Wisconsin Art Inc

The museum of wisconsin art celebrates the value, diversity, and uniqueness of the visual arts and artists of wisconsin. this is achieved by collecting, conserving, documenting, exhibiting, and promoting aesthetic understanding of the…

Arts & Culture
11
Uwm Research Foundation Inc

Support research and innovation at the university of wisconsin - milwaukee by providing reserach funding, entrepreneurship support, and by engaging in corporate partnering activities to that end.

Community Improvement
12
Harvard Club of Washington Dc

To inform and enrich the intellectual lives of 20,000 alumni of harvard university in the washington, dc area and to assist harvard university with respect to applicants and undergraduates from the dc area.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Milwaukee Art Museum Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bay Area Association of Disabled Sailors. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
17/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Holocaust Education Resource Center: $9,391 · OtherHolocaust Education Resource CenterThe Shul: $8,766 · OtherThe ShulCONGREGATION AGUDAS ACHIM: $5,400 · OtherCONGREGATION AGUDAS ACHIMMilwaukee Jewish Foundation: $4,400 · OtherMilwaukee Jewish FoundationIndividual grant recipient: $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTEMPLE BETH SHALOM: $2,125 · OtherJewish Community Foundation: $1,800 · Other+39 more: $11,800 · Other+39 moreMILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $21,604 · PhilanthropyMILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION …MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $5,065 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE…MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC: $1,008 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE…The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $650 · Arts & CultureThe Unite…CREATE WISCONSIN INC: $600 · Arts & CultureCREATE WI…+1 more: $50 · Arts & CultureSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $2,925 · Crime & LegalCenter for Excellence in Education: $2,500 · Science & TechTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $1,150 · EducationDISCOVERY WORLD LTD: $340 · EducationTHE UWM FOUNDATION INC: $325 · EducationPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC: $1,145 · HealthABCD INC: $400 · HealthPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $100 · Health
Other$46,682Philanthropy$21,604Arts & Culture$7,373Crime & Legal$2,925Science & Tech$2,500Education$1,815Health$1,645

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $21,604 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $5,065 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $2,925 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCenter for Excellence in Education: $2,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $1,150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC: $1,145 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC: $1,008 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $650 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCREATE WISCONSIN INC: $600 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC: $475 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetABCD INC: $400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDISCOVERY WORLD LTD: $340 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UWM FOUNDATION INC: $325 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE JEWISH DAY SCHOOL INC: $225 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL MILWAUKEE: $122 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHistoric Haymarket Milwaukee Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTUDENT ORGAN DONATION ADVOCATES: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Center for Excellence in Education ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds CREATE WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds ABCD INC ↗
  • Who funds DISCOVERY WORLD LTD ↗
  • Who funds THE UWM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE JEWISH DAY SCHOOL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Harri Hoffmann Family Foundation IncWI19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Harri Hoffmann Family Foundation Inc · Daniel M Soref Rvoc Tr · Anon Charitable Trust · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Ralph Evinrude Foundation Inc · Pelz Family Foundation Inc · Charter Manufacturing Company Foundation Inc · Howard Frankenthal Family Foundation Ltd · Peck Foundation Milwaukee Ltd · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Louis Ancel Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Louis Ancel Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Louis Ancel’s filings →

    More from the funding graph