Skip to content
Lotte S & Felix Bilgrey Memorial Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Lotte S & Felix Bilgrey Memorial Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$110k
Granted FY2026still arriving
3
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$254kEducation$140kReligion$100kSocial Science$88kCivil Rights$55kPhilanthropy$50kFood & Nutrition$20kScience & Tech$15kOther$0
02FY2026 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$40,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
White Plains Hospital Foundation$55,000
Greenwich Hospital Foundation$40,000
New York Law School$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 56% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Feeding Westchester: $10k → 9%American Committee Shaare Zedek: $55k → 17%World Central Kitchen: $10k → 14%Greenwich Hospital Fndtn: $25k → 9%Feeding Westchester: $10k → 9%American Center for Shaare Zadek Med Cntr: $55k → 17%Greenwich Hospital Fndtn: $5k → 9%White Plains Hospital Foundation: $55k → 9%Doctors without Border: $40k → 17%Greenwich Hospital Foundation: $80k → 9%White Plains Hospital Foundation: $40k → 9%American Cancer Society: $1k → 17%Greenwich Hospital Foundation': $40k → 9%White Plains Hospital Foundation: $30k → 9%American Cancer Society: $1k → 17%Greenwich Hospital Foundation: $40k → 9%New York Law School: $35k → 17%Greenwich Hospital Foundation: $30k → 9%New York Law School: $35k → 17%New York Law School: $25k → 17%American Committee Weizmann Institute: $88k → 17%New York Law School: $25k → 17%Am Comm Weizmann Institute: $40k → 17%New York Law School: $15k → 17%American Committee for the Weizmann Inst: $10k → 17%New York Law School: $15k → 17%Am Comm Weizmann Institute: $5k → 17%New York Law School: $5k → 17%American Committee for the Weizmann Inst: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$584k · 8 repeat orgs$248k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2026, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$584k
$248k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+1417%

Still filing today

63%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
HealthInternationalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GH
    GREENWICH HOSPITAL
    4× · 2023–2026 · $190k · revenue +10%
  • NY
    NEW YORK LAW SCHOOL
    7× · 2019–2026 · $155k · revenue +10%
  • WP
    White Plains Hospital Medical Center
    3× · 2023–2026 · $125k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • AC
    American Committee Weizmann Institute
    one grant, 2017 · $88k
  • AC
    American Committee Shaare Zedek
    one grant, 2017 · $55k
  • AC
    American Center for Shaare Zadek Med Cntr
    one grant, 2019 · $55k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
7/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

American Committee Weizmann Institute: $87,500 · OtherAmerican Committee Weizmann InstituteAmerican Committee Shaare Zedek: $55,000 · OtherAmerican Committee Shaare ZedekAmerican Center for Shaare Zadek Med Cntr: $55,000 · OtherAmerican Center for Shaare Zadek Med CntrAm Comm Weizmann Institute: $45,000 · OtherAm Comm Weizmann InstituteDoctors without Border: $40,000 · OtherDoctors without BorderGreenwich Hospital Fndtn: $30,000 · OtherGreenwich Hospital FndtnFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $20,000 · OtherFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC+1 more: $4,000 · OtherGREENWICH HOSPITAL: $190,000 · HealthGREENWICH HOSPITALWhite Plains Hospital Medical Center: $125,000 · HealthWhite Plains Hospital Medical CenterNEW YORK LAW SCHOOL: $155,000 · EducationNEW YORK LAW SCHOOLFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $50,000 · Community ImprovementAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC: $15,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 · International
Other$336,500Health$315,000Education$155,000Community Improvement$50,000International$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREENWICH HOSPITAL: $190,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK LAW SCHOOL: $155,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWhite Plains Hospital Medical Center: $125,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREENWICH HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK LAW SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds White Plains Hospital Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lotte S & Felix Bilgrey Memorial Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lotte S & Felix Bilgrey Memorial Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Greenwich Hospital: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lotte S & Felix Bilgrey Memorial Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lotte S & Felix Bilgrey Memorial Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lotte S & Felix Bilgrey Memorial’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home