Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

California · Public charity

Los Angeles Section National Council of Jewish Women

Ncjwla ensures economic justice and equity for women in los angeles through direct cash assistance, skill building, and advocating for policies that safeguard women's financial stability and prosperity. We work in community with women to create a los angeles wherein all women succeed financially, physically, socially, and emotionally. We…

$2.1M
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
1
Itemized grants FY2025
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$89k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$88,892
Largest grant, FY2025
$88,892
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$21M

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2025 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
University of Nevada Las Vegas Foundation$88,89210%

Compare Los Angeles Section National Council of Jewish Women with peer funders

About Los Angeles Section National Council of Jewish Women

How much does Los Angeles Section National Council of Jewish Women give?
Los Angeles Section National Council of Jewish Women reported 1 itemized grants totaling $88,892, out of $2,094,158 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing.
What does Los Angeles Section National Council of Jewish Women fund?
By grant dollars over FY2025 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (100%).
Who are Los Angeles Section National Council of Jewish Women's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2025 to FY2025: University of Nevada Las Vegas Foundation ($89k).
Where is Los Angeles Section National Council of Jewish Women based?
Los Angeles Section National Council of Jewish Women is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Los Angeles Section National Council of Jewish Women’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home