Skip to content

· Public charity

Los Angeles Philanthropic Foundation

Provide scholarships to privately endowed colleges and universities in southern california.

$132k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$24k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.3M
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$21,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HARVEY MUDD$24,000
PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY$24,000
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$21,000
POMONA COLLEGE$21,000
MOUNT SAINT MARYS COLLEGE$21,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$21,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $14k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS: $14k → 14%CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $21k → 14%CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $14k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS: $14k → 14%CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $21k → 14%CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $14k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS: $14k → 14%CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $14k → 14%CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $14k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS: $14k → 14%CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $14k → 14%CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $14k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS: $14k → 14%CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $14k → 14%CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $14k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS: $14k → 14%CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $14k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS: $14k → 14%CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $14k → 14%CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $14k → 14%CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $14k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF LA VERNE: $14k → 14%MOUNT SAINT MARYS COLLEGE: $21k → 14%MOUNT SAINT MARYS COLLEGE: $21k → 14%MOUNT SAINT MARYS COLLEGE: $16k → 14%POMONA COLLEGE: $21k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $24k → 14%POMONA COLLEGE: $21k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $21k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $17k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $17k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $17k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $17k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $17k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $17k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $17k → 14%PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY: $24k → 14%PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY: $24k → 14%PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY: $19k → 14%PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY: $17k → 14%PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY: $17k → 14%PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY: $17k → 14%PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY: $17k → 14%PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY: $17k → 14%PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 14%HARVEY MUDD: $24k → 14%HARVEY MUDD: $21k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 9 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
0

Total granted

$1.1M
$0

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PU
    PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $167k · revenue +51%
  • HM
    Harvey Mudd College
    9× · 2017–2025 · $143k · revenue +49%
  • POMONA COLLEGE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $140k · revenue +90%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    California Lutheran University

    The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

    Education
    2
    University of Miami

    See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

    Education
    3
    Lewis & Clark College

    Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

    Education
    4
    St Marys University of Minnesota

    Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

    Education
    5
    Western New England University

    Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

    Education
    6
    Lehigh University

    The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

    Education
    7
    The Catholic University of America

    As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

    Education
    8
    Wesleyan University

    Wesleyan university is dedicated to providing an education in liberal arts by building a diverse, energetic community of students, faculty, and staff who value independence of mind and generosity of spirit. see additional description in…

    Education
    9
    St Mary's University

    St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

    —
    10
    Marquette University

    As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

    Education
    11
    The Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame

    The corporation of saint mary's college, notre dame (saint mary's) is a catholic, residential, women's, liberal arts college offering undergraduate degrees and co-educational graduate programs. (continued in schedule o)

    Education
    12
    Southern California University of Health Sciences

    The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

    Education
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of La Verne; the most unlike its peers is Pomona College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    10/10
    Grantees still filing
    9/10
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY: $167,000 · EducationPEPPERDINE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $164,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAHarvey Mudd College: $143,000 · EducationHarvey Mudd CollegePOMONA COLLEGE: $140,000 · EducationPOMONA COLLEGECALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $140,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYMOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY: $140,000 · EducationMOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF LA VERNE: $98,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF LA VERNEUNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS: $98,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF REDLANDSLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY: $92,000 · EducationLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITYCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $84,000 · EducationCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY
    Education$1,266,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY: $167,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $164,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHarvey Mudd College: $143,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPOMONA COLLEGE: $140,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $140,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY: $140,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF LA VERNE: $98,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS: $98,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY: $92,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $84,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY ↗
    • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
    • Who funds Harvey Mudd College ↗
    • Who funds POMONA COLLEGE ↗
    • Who funds CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
    • Who funds MOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY ↗
    • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF LA VERNE ↗
    • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS ↗
    • Who funds LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY ↗
    • Who funds CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY ↗

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Los Angeles Philanthropic Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Los Angeles Philanthropic Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

    2025
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to Los Angeles Philanthropic Foundation?

      Find your warmest path to Los Angeles Philanthropic Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Los Angeles Philanthropic’s filings →

      More from the funding graph