Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

Ohio · Private foundation

Loren S Hunter Mem F Tuw

Its FY2022 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$58k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
2
Organizations funded FY2020
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Loren S Hunter Mem F Tuw’s FY2022 grant dollars went to Community Foundation Of The Mahoning Valley, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

2
’20
0
’22

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2022
$57,654
Largest grant, FY2022
$57,654
States reached, FY2022
1
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2022.

Philanthropy$58kEducation$2k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2020, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Miami University$1,0501n/a
Berea College$1,05010%

Compare Loren S Hunter Mem F Tuw with peer funders

About Loren S Hunter Mem F Tuw

How much does Loren S Hunter Mem F Tuw give?
Loren S Hunter Mem F Tuw reported 1 grants totaling $57,654 in its FY2022 IRS filing.
What does Loren S Hunter Mem F Tuw fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2020, its largest causes are Philanthropy (96%), Education (4%).
Who are Loren S Hunter Mem F Tuw's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2020: Miami University ($1k), Berea College ($1k).
Does Loren S Hunter Mem F Tuw accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Where is Loren S Hunter Mem F Tuw based?
Loren S Hunter Mem F Tuw is based in OH.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 3 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home