Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Local Management Board of Allegany County

Building the community's capacity to provide parents and caregivers the resources to create nurturing, stable environments for our county's children through interagency coordination and planning.

$393k
Granted FY2021
3
Grants FY2021
2
States reached
$210k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172021.

Youth Development$1.4MHealth$300kHuman Services$270k
02FY2021 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$125,266
Median grant
2
States reached
$412k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$210,210
Individual grant recipient$125,266
CUMBERLAND YMCA$52,789
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $270k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CUMBERLAND YMCA: $60k → 18%CUMBERLAND YMCA: $53k → 18%CUMBERLAND YMCA: $53k → 18%CUMBERLAND YMCA: $53k → 18%CUMBERLAND YMCA: $51k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.7M · 7 repeat orgs$256k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against -3% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2021, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
3

Total granted

$1.7M
$256k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
-3%

Still filing today

43%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
HealthHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2019–2021 · $623k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2019–2021 · $328k
  • YO
    YMCA OF CUMBERLAND MARYLAND INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $270k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • AC
    ALLEGANY COUNTY HRDC
    one grant, 2018 · $148k
  • OO
    Office Of Consumer Advocates Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $93k · revenue -3%
  • AY
    ALLEGANY YOUTH ENRICHMENT PROG SVC
    one grant, 2020 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
2/4
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $623,439 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $327,722 · OtherIndividual grant recipientALLEGANY COUNTY BOARD OF ED — $237,817 · OtherALLEGANY COUNTY BOARD OF EDALLEGANY COUNTY HRDC — $148,068 · OtherALLEGANY COUNTY HRDCUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK — $61,244 · Other+1 more — $14,856 · OtherYMCA OF CUMBERLAND MARYLAND INC — $269,711 · Human ServicesYMCA OF CUMBERL…Office Of Consumer Advocates Inc — $93,181 · HealthOffice Of Cons…UPMC WESTERN MARYLAND CORPORATION — $86,878 · HealthUPMC WESTERN M…NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH — $58,844 · HealthNATIONAL COUNC…
Other$1,413,146Human Services$269,711Health$238,903

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYMCA OF CUMBERLAND MARYLAND INC — $269,711 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetOffice Of Consumer Advocates Inc — $93,181 over 1y, 13% of budgetUPMC WESTERN MARYLAND CORPORATION — $86,878 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH — $58,844 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YMCA OF CUMBERLAND MARYLAND INC
  • Who funds Office Of Consumer Advocates Inc
  • Who funds UPMC WESTERN MARYLAND CORPORATION
  • Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Local Management Board of Allegany County funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Upmc Western Maryland Corporation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Local Management Board of Allegany County?

Find your warmest path to Local Management Board of Allegany County through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph