How much did LOCAL JOBS & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 72% of LOCAL JOBS & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2022

—

2023

analysis reducereduce carboncarbon pollutiontraining engagementdeploymentadvocatepolicies

2024

non-political educationanalysis benefitsbenefits affordabledeploymentcriminal justicecommittedgains

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k2 grants · $16k
$10k–50k10 grants · $264k
$50k–250k15 grants · $1.6M
$250k+8 grants · $6.6M

$85,000

Median grant

States reached

$8.7M

Total assets

Largest grants

AMERICAN JOBS AND ENERGY SECURITY$1,654,000
CONSERVATIVES FOR A CLEAN ENERGY FUTURE$1,460,000
WORKING FAMILIES PARTY PAC$1,175,000
LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS INC$700,000
NEBRASKA CONSERVATION VOTERS$527,000
FARM TO POWER INC$500,000
TCE VOTECLEANORG PAC$377,500
CLEAN UP THE RIVER ENVIRONMENT$250,000
KANSANS FOR AN AFFORDABLE FUTURE$185,000
MICHIGAN DEMOCRATIC STATE CENTRAL COMMITTEE$175,000
ACCELERATE ACTION INC$165,000
ALASKA PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP INC$150,000
LEAD LOCALLY$125,000
ONE TALLAHASSEE PAC$100,000
DEMOCRACYFIRST PAC$100,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $165k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

38%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$4.0M · 9 repeat orgs$6.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +441% since the first grant, against +146% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$4.0M

$893k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+441%

+146%

Still filing today

100%

40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.6M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EnvironmentPublic BenefitCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CF
Conservatives for a Clean Energy Future
2× · 2023–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +1184% · 29% of their budget
NC
NEBRASKA CONSERVATION VOTERS
2× · 2023–2024 · $777k · revenue +848% · 55% of their budget
PL
PODER LATINX
2× · 2023–2024 · $360k · revenue +130%

Funded once

ED
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE ACTION FUND
one grant, 2023 · $290k · revenue +21%
CV
CONSERVATIVE VALUES PAC
one grant, 2023 · $191k
GC
GEORGIA CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUNDgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +146%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Texas Campaign for the Environment

Empowering Texans to fight pollution through sustained grassroots organizing campaigns that shift corporate and governmental policy.

Environment

California Environmental Voters

ENVIROVOTERS ED FUND is a nonpartisan organization dedicated to improving the quality of the environment for all Californians. ENVIROVOTERS ED FUND works to build the capacity of environmental organizations by developing and providing…

Environment

California Environmental Voters

To increase public awareness of elected officials' performances on environmental issues, to influence decisions of public officials on environmental legislation and policy, and to engage in related social welfare activities to promote and…

Civil Rights

American Common Ground Council Inc

ConservAmerica is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to the development and advancement of market based energy, environmental, and conservation policy.

Environment

National Caucus of Environmental

The national caucus of environmental legislators empowers a nonpartisan network of legislative champions to protect, conserve, and improve the natural and human environment.

Education

United for Clean Power

United for Clean Power is focused on public policies that build a 21st century energy future.

Environment

Clean Energy Group Inc

Clean Energy Group promotes effective clean energy policies, develops low carbon technology innovation strategies and promotes new financial tools to strengthen the economy and stabilize climate change.

Environment

Center for Energy and Environment

The Center for Energy and Environment (CEE) is a clean energy nonprofit with decades of special expertise in energy efficiency. Working in homes, buildings, and communities, CEE discovers and deploys the most effective energy solutions to…

Environment

Clean Energy for America Inc

Clean Energy for Americas purpose is to engage with clean energy workers and advance the clean energy movement. CE4A highlights the feasibility and positive impact of a clean energy economy, educates policymakers and the general public on…

Environment

Cleaner Economy Coalition Inc

To support policies that reduce global emissions and improve u.s. competitiveness.

—

Texas Clean Energy Coalition

—

Electoral Collective Action

Electoral Collective Action coordinates a broad-based coalition of existing entities active in the climate justice and community organizing space to raise public awareness and educational opportunities.

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Environmental Defense Action Fund and the most unlike its peers is Arizonans for a Clean Economy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

24 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

24/24

Grantees still filing

20/24

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$7,613,381Environment$1,024,400Civil Rights$715,898Food & Nutrition$500,000Public Benefit$475,000Human Services$165,000Community Improvement$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tides AdvocacyCA27.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tides Advocacy · Energy Action Fund · Sixteen Thirty Fund · Windward Fund · Green Advocacy Project · All Hands on Deck Network Inc · United States Energy Foundation · American Jobs and Energy Security Fund · Western Organization of Resource · League of Conservation Voters Inc · Way to Win Action Fund Inc · Tides Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation LOCAL JOBS & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: KANSANS FOR AN AFFORDABLE FUTURE.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~8 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 2 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

2 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.6× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 932362019 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on KANSANS FOR AN AFFORDABLE FUTURE, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 8 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 71% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Local Jobs & Economic Development Fund?

Find your warmest path to Local Jobs & Economic Development Fund through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

LOCAL JOBS & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

24 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Local Jobs & Economic Development Fund?

More from the funding graph

LOCAL JOBS & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

24 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Local Jobs & Economic Development Fund?

More from the funding graph