Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lloyd K & Peggy L Stephens Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$234k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$406kEducation$382kHuman Services$167kYouth Development$140kFood & Nutrition$52kArts & Culture$37kCrime & Legal$28kPublic Safety & Disaster$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $230k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPROUTS CHILD DEVELOPMENT$40,000
UNION PUBLIC SCHOOLS$30,000
OU COLLEGE OF PUBLIC HEALTH$25,000
CAMP FIRE GREEN COUNTRY$25,000
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES$25,000
COFFEE BUNKER$20,000
GAINING GROUND$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
LILYFIELD$10,000
HELPING HANDS MINISTRY$10,000
HARMONY PROJECT$10,000
OKLAHOMA PARTNERSHIP FOR SCHOOL READINES$10,000
TULSA ADVOCATES FOR PROTECTION OF CHILDR$2,000
TULSA ASPCA$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $105k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HELPING HANDS MINISTRY: $10k → 15%HELPING HANDS MINISTRY: $10k → 15%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $50k → 15%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $25k → 15%LILYFIELD: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 16 repeat orgs$114k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
9

Total granted

$1.1M
$69k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+100%

Still filing today

50%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SPROUTS CHILD DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $315k · revenue +548%
  • O4
    OKLAHOMA 4-H FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2017–2021 · $60k · revenue +24%
  • HB
    HONOR BUNKER INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $60k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • Morton Comprehensive Health Services Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +100%
  • CS
    COMMUNITY SERVICE COUNCIL OF TULSA
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • TA
    TULSA ADVOCATES PROTECTION OF CHILD
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

—
2
Child Advocacy Center of Central Ok Inc

The purpose of the organization is to provide hope-centered, trauma-informed, child-first services that unite law enforcement, child protective services (state and tribal), prosecutors, mental health professionals, and medical…

Human Services
3
East Central Oklahoma Family Health Center Inc

To provide preventative primary affordable clinical health care, dental and prescription drug coverage to the consumers to include the uninsured and under insured.

Health
4
Oklahoma City Housing Services Redevelopment Corporation

To revitalize urban oklahoma city neighborhoods and create affordable housing opportunities by rehabilitating historic homes, constructing new homes, and increasing community investment through home ownership.

Housing & Shelter
5
Lighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers

Lighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers, Inc. serves the community behavioral health needs of nine counties of Southern Oklahoma. Lighthouse offers integrated care through their outpatient and Health Home programs to adults and children.…

Health
6
La Luz Organization Inc

La Luz Organization helps the underserved Latino population in Oklahoma with culturally and faith based trauma-informed services to victims of domestic violence,sexual assault and stalking.

Human Services
7
Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs Inc

To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.

Public Safety & Disaster
8
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc

Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.

Employment
9
Oklahoma City Beautiful Inc

OKC Beautiful's mission is to lead beautification and environmental stewardship through collaboration, education and advocacy. We have been doing this for over 50 years through volunteers and contributing donors. This directly impacts the…

Environment
10
Family Hope House Inc

Family Hope House empowers families through therapy, education, and advocacy. As Oklahoma's sole adoption competent mental health agency, we support foster and adoptive children for lasting stability and success.

Health
11
Family Crisis Center Inc

The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.

Human Services
12
Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc

The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Domestic Violence Intervention Services; the most unlike its peers is Choregus Productions Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNION PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $219,020 · OtherUNION PUBLIC SCHOOLSOKLAHOMA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $87,853 · OtherOKLAHOMA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONCAMP FIRE GREEN COUNTRY INC: $80,000 · OtherCAMP FIRE GREEN COUNTRY INCCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $51,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOOD BANKOKLAHOMA PARTNERSHIP FOR SCHOOL READINES: $50,000 · OtherOKLAHOMA PARTNERSHIP FOR SCHOOL READINESOU COLLEGE OF PUBLIC HEALTH: $50,000 · OtherOU COLLEGE OF PUBLIC HEALTHIndividual grant recipient: $29,000 · Other+9 more: $78,500 · Other+9 moreSPROUTS CHILD DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE INC: $315,000 · EducationSPROUTS CHILD DEVELOPMENT INIT…GAINING GROUND CORPORATION: $15,000 · Education+1 more: $6,000 · EducationDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $75,000 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC …BOSTON AVENUE HELPING HANDS INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesBOSTON AV…LILYFIELD INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesLILYFIELD…HONOR BUNKER INC: $60,000 · HealthMorton Comprehensive Health Services Inc: $15,000 · HealthPublic Health Institute: $10,000 · HealthOKLAHOMA 4-H FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 · Youth DevelopmentTulsa SPCA: $10,000 · AnimalsFAMILY SAFETY CENTER INC: $10,000 · Crime & LegalCHOREGUS PRODUCTIONS INC: $7,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$645,873Education$336,000Human Services$105,000Health$85,000Youth Development$60,000Animals$10,000Crime & Legal$10,000Arts & Culture$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSPROUTS CHILD DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE INC: $315,000 over 6y, 8.1% of budgetCAMP FIRE GREEN COUNTRY INC: $80,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $75,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetOKLAHOMA 4-H FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetHONOR BUNKER INC: $60,000 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetBOSTON AVENUE HELPING HANDS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetMorton Comprehensive Health Services Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGAINING GROUND CORPORATION: $15,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetLILYFIELD INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPublic Health Institute: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTulsa SPCA: $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY SAFETY CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetThe Carol Emmott Foundation: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SPROUTS CHILD DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP FIRE GREEN COUNTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA 4-H FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HONOR BUNKER INC ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON AVENUE HELPING HANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds Morton Comprehensive Health Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds GAINING GROUND CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds LILYFIELD INC ↗
  • Who funds Public Health Institute ↗
  • Who funds Tulsa SPCA ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SAFETY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHOREGUS PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Carol Emmott Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tulsa Community FoundationOK27.8× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tulsa Community Foundation · George Kaiser Family Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · The Gelvin Foundation · Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation · Ed Darby Foundation Inc · Paul L Sisk and Helen I Sisk Charitable Trust · Tulsa Fdn Gen Fd Xxxxx8000 · Flint Family Foundation · Mervin Bovaird Foundation · Morningcrest Healthcare Foundation · Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation the Trust Company of Oklahoma

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lloyd K & Peggy L Stephens Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lloyd K & Peggy L Stephens Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 25%
  • Morton Comprehensive Health Services Inc: 25% of income from government
  • Domestic Violence Intervention Services: 15% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lloyd K & Peggy L Stephens Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lloyd K & Peggy L Stephens Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lloyd K & Peggy L Stephens’ filings →

More from the funding graph