How much does Livyat Hen Foundation give?

Livyat Hen Foundation reported 1 grants totaling $69,083 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 8 and 33 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2023.

What does Livyat Hen Foundation fund?

By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2024, its largest causes are Philanthropy (55%), Religion (31%), Food & Nutrition (1%).

Who are Livyat Hen Foundation's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2019 to FY2024: Sephardic Torah Center ($20k), Yeshivat Lev Eliyahu Inc ($12k), Vaad Tehilim Torah ($11k).

Does Livyat Hen Foundation fund new organizations?

In FY2023, 50% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does Livyat Hen Foundation accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

Which funders back the same organizations as Livyat Hen Foundation?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc, The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation, The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation.

Where is Livyat Hen Foundation based?

Livyat Hen Foundation is based in NY.

Livyat Hen Foundation

Livyat Hen Foundation at a glance Also receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Livyat Hen Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$69k

Granted FY2024still arriving

Grants FY2024still arriving

States reached

$69k

Largest

01What it funds

0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Philanthropy$225kReligion$129kFood & Nutrition$5kEducation$3kHealth$2kHuman Services$2kRecreation & Sports$383Other$0

02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$69,083

Median grant

States reached

$4k

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
VARIOUS	$69,083

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–20, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$236k · 18 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$236k

$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%

+93%

Still filing today

28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesReligionEducationHealthPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

KA
KETER ARAM TZOVA INC
2× · 2019–2023 · $7k · revenue +239%
TS
THE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC
2× · 2019–2020 · $5k · revenue +62%
SC
SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC
2× · 2019–2020 · $1k · revenue +67%

Funded once

KY
KEREN YOM TOV INCgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $9k · revenue +88%
IG
Individual grant recipient
one grant, 2023 · $3k
CB
CONGREGATION BAIS SHALOM INC
one grant, 2019 · $3k

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Tal Hashamayim Foundation

Religion

Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—

Zichron Moshe Elihu Tzedoka Fund

Philanthropy

Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation

Philanthropy

Meor Hachaim Foundation

Philanthropy

Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel

Philanthropy

Zechut Avot Foundation

Philanthropy

Zichroin Rabbeini Meshilem Feiish Ztl Foundation

—

Zichron Chaim Meir Foundation

Philanthropy

Ahavas Torah V'chesed

Philanthropy

Tzemach Yifroch Foundation

—

Meir Isa Bracha Inc

To help establish and maintain agendas for Hebrew and religious enlightenment

Religion

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Eizer Chaim Yom Tov Inc; the most unlike its peers is Vh Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

15/17

Grantees still filing

16/17

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$241,497Religion$16,255Food & Nutrition$4,963Human Services$2,678Education$1,851Health$983Philanthropy$553

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Adjmi Family Foundation IncNY32.5× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · The Setton Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Cabasso Family Foundation · The Safdeye Brothers Foundation Inc · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc · The Adjmi-Dwek Foundation Inc · The Madeb Family Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Livyat Hen Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Livyat Hen Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

2get no government money at all

2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Livyat Hen Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Livyat Hen Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

Play a game based on Livyat Hen’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home