Skip to content

· Public charity

Livelihood Nw

Our mission is to foster business sustainability and growth for entrepreneurs to build thriving local communities.

$267k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $83,830, the rows itemized in this filing. The $266,515 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $182,685 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
$9,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JCL CONCRETE POLISHING$10,000
HOT MAMA SALSA$10,000
ASTREAUS PURVEYORS INC$10,000
LA CASA DE MAMA PDX$10,000
BLUE MOUNTAIN CANINE LLC$9,000
MISTER BITTEN LLC$8,830
COKIEA'S KITCHEN$8,000
KICHANA LLC$6,000
CAFE DE CREPE LLC$6,000
KALAPUYA WEAVING AND CONSULTING$6,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 70% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MISTER BITTEN LLC: $9k → 8%LA CASA DE MAMA PDX: $10k → 8%KALAPUYA WEAVING AND CONSULTING: $6k → 11%BLUE MOUNTAIN CANINE LLC: $9k → 12%ASTREAUS PURVEYORS INC: $10k → 12%CAFE DE CREPE LLC: $6k → 8%JCL CONCRETE POLISHING: $10k → 12%HOT MAMA SALSA: $10k → 12%COKIEA'S KITCHEN: $8k → 12%KICHANA LLC: $6k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
03the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2025–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2025 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOT MAMA SALSA: $10,000 · OtherHOT MAMA SALSAASTREAUS PURVEYORS INC: $10,000 · OtherASTREAUS PURVEYORS INCJCL CONCRETE POLISHING: $10,000 · OtherJCL CONCRETE POLISHINGLA CASA DE MAMA PDX: $10,000 · OtherLA CASA DE MAMA PDXBLUE MOUNTAIN CANINE LLC: $9,000 · OtherBLUE MOUNTAIN CANINE LLCMISTER BITTEN LLC: $8,830 · OtherMISTER BITTEN LLCCOKIEA'S KITCHEN: $8,000 · OtherCOKIEA'S KITCHENCAFE DE CREPE LLC: $6,000 · OtherCAFE DE CREPE LLCKALAPUYA WEAVING AND CONSULTING: $6,000 · OtherKALAPUYA WEAVING AND CONSULTINGKICHANA LLC: $6,000 · OtherKICHANA LLC
Other$83,830

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Livelihood Nw?

Find your warmest path to Livelihood Nw through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Livelihood Nw’s filings →

More from the funding graph