Skip to content

· Private foundation

Live Oak Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$294k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$225k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Religion$1.0MHuman Services$118kYouth Development$60kHousing & Shelter$50kPublic Benefit$18kEducation$15kEnvironment$11kArts & Culture$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $19k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $275k
$7,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$7.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST FRANCIS ANGLICAN CHURCH$225,000
OUTREACH MISSION$50,000
HELPING HAND$8,255
THE UNIT FOUNDATION$7,500
PAWLEYS ISLAND CIVIC ASSOCIATION$1,000
CROSSROADS MINISTRIES$1,000
PBS NORTH CAROLINA$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $73k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%YMCA OF THE TRIANGLE: $60k → 8%YMCA OF THE TRIANGLE: $10k → 8%YMCA OF THE TRIANGLE AREA: $1k → 8%YMCA OF THE TRIANGLE: $1k → 8%MIRACLE LEAGUE OF THE TRIANGLE: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 13 repeat orgs$103k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against -47% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
9

Total granted

$1.2M
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
-47%

Still filing today

46%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationReligionYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TY
    The Young Men's Christian Association of the Triangle Area Inc (4598)
    4× · 2019–2022 · $72k · revenue +40%
  • TU
    The Unit Foundation Inc
    5× · 2019–2024 · $38k · revenue ×98
  • LC
    LEE COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2023 · $15k · revenue +96%

Funded once

  • MP
    MISSION PAWLEYS INC
    one grant, 2019 · $26k
  • LC
    LEE COUNTY YOUNG LIFE
    one grant, 2019 · $7k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF NC MARITIME MUSEUM
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Carolina Business Leaders for Educ

The mission of north carolina business leaders for education (dba best nc) is to unite an engaged and informed business perspective to dramatically transform and improve north carolina's education system. our goal is for every student to…

Education
2
The North Carolina Foundation for Christian Minist

To foster and promote christian stewardship and for promoting and providing support to the ministries in north carolina affiliated with or consistent with the convention of original free will baptists and other charitable, education,…

Religion
3
Catch the Fire Ministries Inc

Non-denominational church with the mission of impacting the city of raleigh, durham and the triangle region of north carolina with the gospel of jesus christ, raising up leaders and ministering to the poor of our city.

Religion
4
North Carolina State University College of Sciences Foundation Inc

Provide financial support for all types of education and research within the college of sciences at north carolina state university.

Philanthropy
5
North Carolina Sports Legacy Foundation Fka Promote the Youth Foundation
Philanthropy
6
North Carolina Bankers Association Foundation

The corporation's primary purpose include: (1) making scholarship grants to qualified residents of north carolina; (2) making funds available to any person or entity in order to educate the public regarding financial literacy, banking and…

Education
7
North Carolina Clean Energy Fund Dba Clean Energy Fund of the Carolinas

Our mission is to accelerate investment in clean and efficient energy solutions and increase climate resilience in north and south carolina, particularly to the benefit of underserved populations.

Environment
8
Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

The corporation makes distributions to or for christian churches, ministries, and other charities

Philanthropy
9
North Carolina Textile Foundation Inc

To advance wilson college of textiles through engagement, partnership and philanthropy. as a charitable organization, the foundation supports the college and dean of the college and such support shall include but is not limited to…

Education
10
North Carolina State University Foundation Inc

Supports, by financial assistance and otherwise, the various colleges within the university, the libraries, and other university-connected functions.

Education
11
North Carolina Chamber

The organization is a proactive, nonpartisan business advocacy organization. the organization works in the legislative, regulatory and political arenas to proactively drive positive change to ensure that north carolina is a leading place…

—
12
North Carolina Biotechnology Center

The north carolina biotechnology center aids the biotechnology-related efforts of researchers, businesses, state and federal governments, and other agencies primarily through awards of grants and loans related to specific programs and…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Young Men's Christian Association of the Triangle Area Inc (4598); the most unlike its peers is Northeast Franklin Revitalization. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST FRANCIS ANGLICAN CHURCH: $615,000 · OtherST FRANCIS ANGLICAN CHURCHBOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $43,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBMISSION PAWLEYS INC: $26,100 · Other+15 more: $50,915 · Other+15 moreCONSEQUENTIAL CHRISTIANITY: $359,759 · ReligionCONSEQUENTIAL CHRISTIANITYOUTREACH MISSION INC: $50,000 · ReligionOUTREACH MISSION INCThe Young Men's Christian Association of the Triangle Area Inc (4598): $72,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesThe Unit Foundation Inc: $37,500 · EducationLEE COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $15,000 · EducationNORTH CAROLINA MARINE AND ESTUARY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EnvironmentYOUNG LIFE: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentCROSSNORE COMMUNITIES FOR CHILDREN: $1,000 · Health
Other$735,015Religion$409,759Human Services$73,000Education$52,500Environment$10,000Youth Development$10,000Health$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCONSEQUENTIAL CHRISTIANITY: $359,759 over 3y, 43% of budgetThe Young Men's Christian Association of the Triangle Area Inc (4598): $72,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetOUTREACH MISSION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetThe Unit Foundation Inc: $37,500 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetLEE COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA MARINE AND ESTUARY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MIRACLE LEAGUE OF THE TRIANGLE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCROSSNORE COMMUNITIES FOR CHILDREN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CONSEQUENTIAL CHRISTIANITY ↗
  • Who funds The Young Men's Christian Association of the Triangle Area Inc (4598) ↗
  • Who funds OUTREACH MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Unit Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds LEE COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA MARINE AND ESTUARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds THE MIRACLE LEAGUE OF THE TRIANGLE ↗
  • Who funds CROSSNORE COMMUNITIES FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST FRANKLIN REVITALIZATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Live Oak Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Live Oak Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Live Oak’s filings →

    More from the funding graph