· Private foundation
Listle Family Private Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ANTIGO AREA COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $750 |
| SENIOR CENTER OF LANGLADE COUNTY IN | $650 |
| ANTIGO AREA YOUTH HOCKEY | $600 |
| GRID IRON CLUB INC | $600 |
| ANTIGO DUGOUT CLUB INC | $600 |
| RAPTOR EDUCATION GROUP INC | $600 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF | $600 |
| THE GIVING TREE OF | $500 |
| AVAIL INC | $500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
| ALL SAINTS CATHOLIC SCHOOL | $500 |
| ANTIGO PUBLIC LIBRARY | $500 |
| ANTIGO MUSIC ASSN INC | $300 |
| UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT OF ANTIGO | $100 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 94% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
21 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LCLANGLADE COUNTY SKI CLUB INC7× · 2017–2023 · $5k · revenue +128%
- RERAPTOR EDUCATION GROUP INC8× · 2018–2025 · $4k · revenue +63%
- ADANTIGO DUGOUT CLUB INC8× · 2017–2025 · $3k · revenue +87%
Funded once
- ABANTIGO BOW CLUB INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $500 · revenue +53%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $500
- NTNORTHWOODS TRACTOR CLUB INCone grant, 2022 · $300 · revenue -66%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Maintenance/restoration historical site
Trap range used by members on a daily basis and the pond is stocked for youth and family fishing.
Preserve and promote antique tractors and equipment related to antique tractors.
Recreation
To operate and maintain a museum with many resources, artifacts, and articles open to the public.
Maintain and improve snowmobile trails
Promote xcountry skiing
conservation
Education and Preservation
To provide area youth with special hockey events and activities.
Promote the sport of trap shooting
Promote nordic skiing as a healthy activity
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Antigo Dugout Club Inc and the most unlike its peers is Raptor Education Group Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LANGLADE COUNTY SKI CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds Antigo Area Community Food Pantry ↗
- Who funds RAPTOR EDUCATION GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds ANTIGO DUGOUT CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds ANTIGO MUSIC ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Senior Center of Langlade County In ↗
- Who funds Langlade County Historical Society Inc ↗
- Who funds ANTIGO BOW CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHWOODS TRACTOR CLUB INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Elwyn Remington Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Listle Family Private Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.