Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lisa Dean Moseley Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$18M
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$8.0M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Health$49MEducation$2.7MArts & Culture$125k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k3 grants · $406k
  • $250k+5 grants · $18M
$821,184
Median grant
4
States reached
$98M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEMOURSALFRED I DUPONT HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$8,000,000
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$6,249,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$2,314,604
CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SERVICES INC$821,184
NEW YORK STEM CELL FOUNDATION$250,000
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY$247,668
NYU GROSSMAN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$83,280
CENTER FOR TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH AT THE HELEN F GRAHAM CANCER CENT$75,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 28% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%NEMOURSALFRED I DUPONT HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $14.0M → 10%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $3.3M → 22%THE DAVID J GLADSTONE: $125k → 10%LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY: $6.2M → 9%NYU GROSSMAN SCHOOL OF: $391k → 17%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $1.0M → 15%SHIRLEY RYAN ABILITY LAB: $199k → 14%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY - WM CENTER FOR COLLABORATIVE NEUROSCIENCE: $117k → 8%RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY: $133k → 16%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $375k → 19%NEMOURSALFRED I DUPONT HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $8.0M → 10%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $2.3M → 22%THE DAVID J GLADSTONE: $125k → 10%LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY: $498k → 9%NYU GROSSMAN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $83k → 17%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $248k → 15%SHIRLEY RYAN ABILITY LAB: $125k → 14%NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $51k → 16%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $250k → 19%NEMOURSALFRED I DUPONT HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $1.2M → 10%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $396k → 22%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $186k → 17%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $207k → 15%SHIRLEY RYAN ABILITY LAB: $125k → 14%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $250k → 19%NEMOURSALFRED I DUPONT HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $849k → 10%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $396k → 22%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $182k → 17%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $164k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE: $495k → 19%NEMOURSALFRED I DUPONT HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $845k → 10%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $733k → 22%NEW YORK STEM CELL FOUNDATION: $500k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF MD MEDICAL SYSTEM: $125k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $125k → 10%TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $468k → 22%NEW YORK STEM CELL FOUNDATION: $250k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE: $125k → 19%CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SERVICES INC: $1.8M → 10%DREXEL UNIVERSITY: $249k → 22%CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SERVICES INC: $944k → 10%DREXEL UNIVERSITY: $235k → 22%CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SERVICES INC: $821k → 10%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $208k → 22%CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SERVICES INC: $550k → 10%DREXEL UNIVERSITY: $125k → 22%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $83k → 22%TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $77k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
OH
PA
NJ
CA
MD
DE
NC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$51M · 15 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
6

Total granted

$51M
$942k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+29%

Still filing today

60%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $158k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SERVICES INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $4.1M · revenue +62%
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA
    3× · 2020–2022 · $1.0M · revenue +59%
  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2020–2022 · $875k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • NG
    NYU GROSSMAN SCHOOL OF
    one grant, 2022 · $391k
  • RT
    RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $133k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MD MEDICAL SYSTEM
    one grant, 2020 · $125k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
2
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
3
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
4
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
5
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
6
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
7
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
8
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
9
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
10
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
11
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
12
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and the most unlike its peers is Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NEMOURSALFRED I DUPONT HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN — $24,884,213 · OtherNEMOURSALFRED I DUPONT HOSPITAL FOR CHILDRENOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY — $1,618,668 · OtherOHIO STATE UNIVERSITYCLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION — $1,374,952 · Other+11 more — $2,344,362 · Other+11 moreBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $6,747,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INCAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $6,441,012 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INCCHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SERVICES INC — $4,132,257 · HealthCHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SERVICES INCTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $1,024,999 · HealthNEW YORK STEM CELL FOUNDATION INC — $750,000 · Health+1 more — $448,596 · HealthJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $875,000 · EducationDREXEL UNIVERSITY — $609,776 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $544,816 · EducationNew York University — $367,870 · Education
Other$30,222,195Health$19,543,864Education$2,397,462

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $6,747,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $6,441,012 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SERVICES INC — $4,132,257 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $1,024,999 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $875,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK STEM CELL FOUNDATION INC — $750,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY — $609,776 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $544,816 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRehabilitation Institute of Chicago — $448,596 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNew York University — $367,870 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE — $125,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SERVICES INC
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds NEW YORK STEM CELL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds DREXEL UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
  • Who funds Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
  • Who funds New York University
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lisa Dean Moseley Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • University of Delaware30% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University12% of income from government
  • Christiana Care Health Services Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lisa Dean Moseley Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lisa Dean Moseley Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph