Skip to content
Linda & Jack Tamir Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Linda & Jack Tamir Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$440k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$458kHuman Services$186kArts & Culture$120kHealth$89kPhilanthropy$85kEducation$53kPublic Safety & Disaster$30kYouth Development$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $149k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $244k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$667
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRUCE SPRINSTEEN ARCHIVES & CENTER FOR AMERICAN MUSIC$100,000
THE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER$73,800
EDMOND J SAFRA SYN OF DEAL$70,101
CONGREGATION BETH TORAH$49,137
RANDIS CARE INC$38,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF CHABAD LUBAVITCH ARUBA INC$26,000
SEPHARDIC COMMUNITY CENTER$15,550
THE SAFE FOUNDATION$10,000
KINGS HIGHWAY BEAUTIFICATION ASSOCIATION$10,000
Individual grant recipient$7,200
Individual grant recipient$7,000
ANGUILLA PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION OF NY$5,000
SEPHARDIC CENTER OF RABBINIC & SECULAR$5,000
LEV CHANA$4,000
HATZALAH EMS OF THE JERSEY SHORE$3,600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ISRAEL MEDICAL FUND: $1k → 17%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $2k → 20%ATIME: $28k → 20%THE MITZVAH MAN FOUNDATION: $2k → 20%CARE FOR SPECIAL NEEDS CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $1k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$712k · 20 repeat orgs$437k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
40

Total granted

$712k
$284k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+8%

Still filing today

45%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $153k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’23’24’25
HealthEducationReligionHuman ServicesArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    SHEFA SCHOOL
    2× · 2023–2024 · $50k · revenue +35%
  • SF
    SAFE FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $31k · revenue +43%
  • SC
    SEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $31k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • AE
    AHI EZER CONGREGATION
    one grant, 2024 · $36k
  • AT
    A Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange
    one grant, 2024 · $28k · revenue +20%
  • YO
    YESHIVA OHR YITZCHOK
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -31%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Sherit Isroel
—
3
Congregation Beth-El Sephardic Center of Jamaica Estates

Congregation beth-el sephardic center of jamaica estates is a religious institution

Religion
4
Yeshivas Nachlas Bnei Shimon

To provide financial assistance to jewish educational and charitable causes.

International
5
Chabad of Bensonhurst Inc

Chabad of Bensonhurst Inc is an organization dedicated to furthering the religious, educational, and charitable needs of the Jewish Community.

—
6
American Friends of Shviti Hashem Inc

To support and promote the study of torah (bible) among members of jewish faith worldwide.

Religion
7
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
8
Bet Midrash Ohel Torah

Operation of a post-secondary educational institution providing rabbinical training with a focus on sephardic/middle eastern jewish tradition.

Education
9
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
10
Yeshiva Derech Hatorah-Yeshivat Mizrachi Lbanim

A school-section 170(b)(1)(a)(ii), operating from the preschool pre-k level through high school, and chartered ny the new york state education department and board of regents.

Education
11
Yeshiva Beit Rafael

Religious & charitable- to provide funds to enable the study of torah.

Philanthropy
12
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Migdal Bais Yaakov Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lung Cancer Research Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/31
Grantees still filing
20/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION BETH TORAH: $150,066 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH TORAHMAGEN DAVID YESHIVAH: $118,600 · OtherMAGEN DAVID YESHIVAHTHE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $92,800 · OtherTHE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTEREDMOND J SAFRA SYN OF DEAL: $80,101 · OtherEDMOND J SAFRA SYN OF DEALAHI EZER CONGREGATION: $36,000 · OtherSAFE FOUNDATION INC: $31,016 · OtherRENEWAL: $25,900 · Other+44 more: $234,078 · Other+44 moreBRUCE SPRINGSTEEN ARCHIVES AND CENTER FOR AMERICAN MUSIC CORPORATION: $100,000 · Arts & CultureBRUCE SPRIN…THE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SEPHARD…RANDIS CARE INC: $43,000 · ReligionRANDIS CARE…American Friends of Chabad Lubavitch Aruba INC: $26,000 · ReligionAmerican Fr…YESHIVA OHR YITZCHOK: $25,000 · ReligionYESHIVA OHR…Yeshivat Lev Torah: $22,810 · ReligionYeshivat Le…+1 more: $1,000 · ReligionSHEFA SCHOOL: $50,000 · EducationMIGDAL BAIS YAAKOV INC: $1,800 · Education+3 more: $2,004 · EducationA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $28,000 · Human ServicesMITZVAH MAN FOUNDATION CORP: $2,002 · Human ServicesSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $1,500 · Human Services+2 more: $2,100 · Human ServicesSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $30,550 · Youth DevelopmentShmira Community Services Inc: $25,000 · Public Benefit
Other$768,561Arts & Culture$120,000Religion$117,810Education$53,804Human Services$33,602Youth Development$30,550Public Benefit$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBRUCE SPRINGSTEEN ARCHIVES AND CENTER FOR AMERICAN MUSIC CORPORATION: $100,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetSHEFA SCHOOL: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRANDIS CARE INC: $43,000 over 2y, 8.2% of budgetSAFE FOUNDATION INC: $31,016 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $30,550 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $28,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYESHIVA OHR YITZCHOK: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetShmira Community Services Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetYeshivat Lev Torah: $22,810 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $18,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKINGS HIGHWAY BEAUTIFICATION ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $5,101 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $4,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSIMHA ORGANIZATION INC: $3,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BIMAD ALON MOREH INC: $1,253 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR SEPHARDIC STUDIES: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL MEDICAL FUND CORP: $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KESHER ORGANIZATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA KETER TORAH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAOR YESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL INC: $504 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BRUCE SPRINGSTEEN ARCHIVES AND CENTER FOR AMERICAN MUSIC CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds SHEFA SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds RANDIS CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds A Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Chabad Lubavitch Aruba INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA OHR YITZCHOK ↗
  • Who funds Shmira Community Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds Yeshivat Lev Torah ↗
  • Who funds THE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247 ↗
  • Who funds KINGS HIGHWAY BEAUTIFICATION ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds LUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SIMHA ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Adjmi Family Fou…The Howard Hoffman & …Jewish Communal FundIsaac & Marjorie Gind…Joseph Jack Sitt 1986…Jack D Cohen Foundati…The Ralph S Gindi Fam…E R G FoundationTed & Renee Serure Fa…The Dweck and Rahmey …Altoon Sutton Memoria…The Mamiye Foundation…
Jack Adjmi Family Foundation IncNY45.6× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Isaac & Marjorie Gindi Foundation Inc · Joseph Jack Sitt 1986 - Charitable Trust · Jack D Cohen Foundation Inc · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation · E R G Foundation · Ted & Renee Serure Family Foundation · The Dweck and Rahmey Family Foundation · Altoon Sutton Memorial Fund · The Mamiye Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Linda & Jack Tamir Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Linda & Jack Tamir Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc: 8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Linda & Jack Tamir Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Linda & Jack Tamir Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Linda & Jack Tamir’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home