Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lind Flora Uw

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$84k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$263kEducation$109kHousing & Shelter$79kHuman Services$47kReligion$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $79k
$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$19,675
TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENN$19,675
BALA PRESBYTERIAN HOME FOUNDATION$19,675
CHAPIN MEM HOME FOR AGD BLIND$19,675
LEWISTOWN HOSPITAL$2,000
ROANOKE HOSPITALCARILION HEALTH SYS$1,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$500
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF ROANOKE$500
BAPTIST CHILDRENS HOME$500
METHODIST CHURCH OF LEWISTOWN$400
YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSN OF JV$300
YMCA OF ROANOKE VALLEY$250
Individual grant recipient$5
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $79k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BALA PRESBYTERIAN HOME FOUNDATION: $23k → 7%BALA PRESBYTERIAN HOME FOUNDATION: $20k → 7%BALA PRESBYTERIAN HOME FOUNDATION: $18k → 7%BALA PRESBYTERIAN HOME FOUNDATION: $18k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$347k · 12 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
2

Total granted

$347k
$29k

Still filing today

17%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $118k
  • CM
    CHAPIN MEM HOME FOR AGD BLIND
    6× · 2020–2025 · $118k
  • BP
    BALA PRESBYTERIAN HOME FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $79k · revenue +144%

Funded once

  • BP
    BALA PRESB HOME FDN FOR AGED CPLS & PERS
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • PH
    PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL OF PHILA
    one grant, 2020 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
3/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $117,900 · OtherCHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONCHAPIN MEM HOME FOR AGD BLIND: $117,900 · OtherCHAPIN MEM HOME FOR AGD BLINDBALA PRESBYTERIAN HOME FOUNDATION: $19,675 · OtherBALA PRESBYTERIAN HOME FOUNDATIONBALA PRESB HOME FDN FOR AGED CPLS & PERS: $19,675 · OtherBALA PRESB HOME FDN FOR AGED CPLS & PERSLEWISTOWN HOSPITAL: $12,000 · Other+9 more: $29,980 · Other+9 moreTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $108,650 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSI…BALA PRESBYTERIAN HOME FOUNDATION: $78,550 · Human ServicesBALA PRESBYTERIAN…
Other$317,130Education$108,650Human Services$78,550

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $108,650 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBALA PRESBYTERIAN HOME FOUNDATION: $78,550 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF VIRGINIA'S BLUE RIDGE INC: $1,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds BALA PRESBYTERIAN HOME FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF VIRGINIA'S BLUE RIDGE INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lind Flora Uw funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lind Flora Uw. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lind Flora Uw’s filings →

    More from the funding graph