Skip to content

· Public charity

Life Science Washington Institute

Our mission is to provide support to life science entrepreneurs and start-up companies via educational, economic and other resources crucial for their success.

$500k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Science & Tech$500kHealth$325kRecreation & Sports$150kArts & Culture$25k
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$141k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EQUICCARE SOLUTIONS LLC$25,000
PRECISION SENSING SPC$25,000
GMJ TECHNOLOGIES INC$25,000
MANAGED HEALTH CONNECTIONS$25,000
POLYBIOMICS INC$25,000
MPATHIC (EMPATHY ROCKS INC DBA)$25,000
ORTHOCARE INNOVATIONS$25,000
TOPOGENE INC$25,000
LIFELENSAR$25,000
AI ANALYSIS INC$25,000
PHOTON BIOSCIENCES LLC$25,000
PICCOLO BIOSYSTEMS INC$25,000
NIMBLE SURGICAL$25,000
METABOLITEDX CORP$25,000
PRECISION QUANTOMICS$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%VIRTICI LLC: $25k → 9%KINEA BIO INC: $25k → 9%VIOLETT: $25k → 9%GLANNAVENTA INC: $25k → 10%APPITURE BIOTECHNOLOGIES INC: $25k → 12%FENOLOGICA BIOSCIENCES INC: $25k → 9%PRECISION SENSING SPC: $25k → 9%PHAIT INC: $25k → 9%PHOTON BIOSCIENCES LLC: $25k → 12%ALLAY HEALTH: $25k → 9%ORTHOCARE INNOVATIONS: $25k → 9%PHOTON BIOSCIENCES LLC: $25k → 12%ICE BEAR THERAPEUTICS SPC: $25k → 9%ALLI CONNECT: $25k → 9%HART3S: $25k → 12%XONOTIV LLC: $25k → 9%GMJ TECHNOLOGIES INC: $25k → 9%MANAGED HEALTH CONNECTIONS: $25k → 12%EQUICCARE SOLUTIONS LLC: $25k → 9%GMJ TECHNOLOGIES INC: $25k → 9%PRECISION QUANTOMICS: $25k → 12%PRIMARY BIOSCIENCE: $25k → 9%REMMIE HEALTH: $25k → 9%METABOLITEDX CORP: $25k → 9%LIFELENSAR: $25k → 9%DOTQUANT LLC: $25k → 9%CATHCONNECT CORPORATION: $25k → 9%TOPOGENE INC: $25k → 9%OPTICYTE INC: $25k → 9%POLYBIOMICS INC: $25k → 9%MPATHIC (EMPATHY ROCKS INC DBA): $25k → 9%AI ANALYSIS INC: $25k → 9%DOCNEXUS: $25k → 9%ORTHOPEDIC WELLNESS LABORATORIES INC: $25k → 9%NIMBLE SURGICAL: $25k → 9%TOPOGENE INC: $25k → 9%PLUREXA: $25k → 9%PICCOLO BIOSYSTEMS INC: $25k → 9%AVM BIOTECHNOLOGY INC: $25k → 9%HISTONE THERAPEUTICS: $25k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of Life Science Washington Institute’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in WA; by stated purpose, 75%.

Life Science Washington Institutelessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 25% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

15%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$150k · 3 repeat orgs$850k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
15

Total granted

$150k
$425k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $425k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PB
    PHOTON BIOSCIENCES LLC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $50k
  • GT
    GMJ TECHNOLOGIES INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $50k
  • TI
    TOPOGENE INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $50k

Funded once

  • PI
    PHAIT INC
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • VL
    VIRTICI LLC
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • CC
    CATHCONNECT CORPORATION
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
05the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2023–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2023 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PHOTON BIOSCIENCES LLC: $50,000 · OtherPHAIT INC: $50,000 · OtherGMJ TECHNOLOGIES INC: $50,000 · OtherMETABOLITEDX CORP: $50,000 · OtherTOPOGENE INC: $50,000 · OtherVIRTICI LLC: $50,000 · Other+28 more: $700,000 · Other+28 more
Other$1,000,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Life Science Washington Institute’s filings →

More from the funding graph