Skip to content

· Public charity

Life Ring Foundation

The foundation was created to provide charitable and emergency assistance to indivuduals and tax-exempt organizations.

$60k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$638kRecreation & Sports$179kEducation$109kYouth Development$20kHuman Services$19k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $52,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $60,065 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $8,065 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$12,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDRENS MIRACLE NETWORK$30,000
VWCC EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$12,000
VA TECH FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Turn the Page Inc: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Memorial Hospital

To provide excellence in the delivery of healthcare.

Health
2
Children's Health Foundation

Children's health foundation (chf) supports children's health system (chs) and children's hospital of the king's daughters (chkd). chf is organized and operated to carry out the charitable, educational and scientific purposes of chs and…

Health
3
Children's Physicians

Children's physicians delivers the highest quality pediatric primary care while supporting education and research.

Health
4
Vcu Health Childrens Services at Brook Road

Vcu health children's services at brook road (csbr), fka crippled children's hospital, is a resource and provider of specialized medical services customized to meet the specific needs of children and their families.

Health
5
Texas Children's Global

To lead efforts that advance healthcare equity through innovative collaboration in care, education, and research globally.

Education
6
Children's Hospital & Medical Center

To improve the life of every child - through exceptional care, advocacy, research and education.

Health
7
Valley Children's Healthcare

To support health care activities and programs for the benefit of, and to provide health care services to, children and adults in central california with diseases, disorders and other health problems of pediatric origin, and to enhance the…

Health
8
Children's Medical Center Corporation

To operate exclusively for the benefit of The Children's Hospital Corporation and its affiliated organizations in the conduct of their charitable, educational and scientific functions.

Health
9
Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine Inc

To develop physician thought leaders through inquiry, research, and discovery, using an innovative curriculum based upon adult learning methods in a patient-centered context. our graduates are physicians with outstanding clinical skills…

—
10
Community Memorial Hospital Foundation

To solicit, receive, and administer gifts, grants, contributions, and donations for community memorial hospital; to distribute funds to the hospital in support of its various programs and activities.

Health
11
Virginia Commonwealth University Intellectual Property Foundation

The foundation determines the patentability and obtains patents on virginia commonwealth university (vcu) inventions and markets and licenses such inventions to commerical entities. the foundation's activities promote research efforts at…

Health
12
Children's Hospital & Medical Center Foundation

Children's nebraska foundation (the foundation) was created in 1981 to raise awareness and manage and distribute funds to support children's hospital & medical center's (the hospital) premier pediatric services and programs. as an advocate…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Carilion Clinic Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Sam & Marion Golden Helping Hand Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Carilion Clinic Foundation: $583,345 · HealthCarilion Clinic FoundationCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $30,000 · HealthVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $264,193 · EducationVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INCVIRGINIA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $24,000 · EducationVIRGINIA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEG…Childrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute: $25,000 · OtherSAM & MARION GOLDEN HELPING HAND FOUNDATION: $14,387 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA INC: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentTURN THE PAGE INC: $5,000 · Human Services
Health$613,345Education$288,193Other$39,387Youth Development$20,000Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCarilion Clinic Foundation: $583,345 over 6y, 6.9% of budgetVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $264,193 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetVIRGINIA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $24,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSAM & MARION GOLDEN HELPING HAND FOUNDATION: $14,387 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTURN THE PAGE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Life Ring Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Life Ring Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 44%
  • Childrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute: 44% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Life Ring Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Life Ring Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Life Ring’s filings →

More from the funding graph