Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lewis-Warburg Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$45k
Granted FY2021
2
Grants FY2021
2
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Science & Tech$509kEducation$145kHousing & Shelter$64kSocial Science$5kReligion$3kHuman Services$2kPublic Benefit$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$1k
02FY2021 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$35,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOLY CROSS HEALTH CENTERS$35,000
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 31% of grant dollars ($227k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 69% that went abroad ($505k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $1k → 10%FRIENDS OF PERIMETER INSTITUTE: $1k → 13%ATLAS NETWORK: $1k → 14%SAINT ANDREW SCHOOL: $15k → 11%GOODPASTURE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $1k → 14%LOVE FOR LOVE CITY FOUNDATION: $1k → 16%HOLY CROSS HEALTH CENTERS: $35k → 8%AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY: $2k → 11%CATO INSTITUTE: $1k → 14%PINE CREST SCHOOLS: $13k → 11%AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY: $1k → 11%THE ASPEN INSTITUTE: $4k → 14%SAINT ANDREW SCHOOL: $10k → 11%AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE: $1k → 14%PINE CREST SCHOOLS: $6k → 11%SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY: $10k → 11%FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $60k → 11%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $4k → 11%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $1k → 11%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $1k → 11%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN: $700 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 69% of all-years giving ($505k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Liechtenstein$505k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

22%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$163k · 6 repeat orgs$568k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +96% since the first grant, against +70% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2021, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
13

Total granted

$163k
$533k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+96%
+70%

Still filing today

33%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
EducationSocial ScienceScience & TechPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    2× · 2017–2019 · $64k
  • UO
    University of Miami
    5× · 2017–2021 · $50k · revenue +96%
  • SA
    SAINT ANDREW SCHOOL
    2× · 2019–2020 · $25k

Funded once

  • AI
    ADVANCEMENT INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $505k
  • SD
    SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • FA
    FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ADVANCEMENT INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $505,000 · OtherADVANCEMENT INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATIONHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $64,032 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYHOLY CROSS HEALTH CENTERS: $35,000 · OtherSAINT ANDREW SCHOOL: $25,000 · Other+9 more: $41,595 · Other+9 moreUniversity of Miami: $50,000 · Education+2 more: $2,000 · EducationTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $3,500 · Social ScienceAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $1,000 · Social ScienceAMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY: $3,460 · Science & TechCATO INSTITUTE: $1,000 · Public Benefit
Other$670,627Education$52,000Social Science$4,500Science & Tech$3,460Public Benefit$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Miami: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY: $3,460 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Miami ↗
  • Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF PERIMETER INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lewis-Warburg Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lewis-Warburg Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • American Physical Society: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lewis-Warburg Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lewis-Warburg Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lewis-Warburg’s filings →

More from the funding graph