Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Levy Family Campus

The mission of the Levy Family Campus is to develop, operate and maintain a community campus for the purpose of housing jewish agencies and services provided by other non-profit organizations.

$7.5M
Granted FY2021
24
Grants FY2021
5
States reached
$4.3M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2021.

Philanthropy$5.2MHuman Services$1.4MEducation$792kReligion$670kHealth$98kHousing & Shelter$77kCommunity Improvement$61kInternational$39kOther$0
02FY2021 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 24 grants below total $5,110,881 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $7,535,089 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,424,208 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k5 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $311k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $471k
  • $250k+1 grant · $4.3M
$25,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UBS Financial Services Inc G$4,291,981
Jewish Family Service$163,448
Jewish Federations of North A$138,500
Addison-Penzak Jewish Communi$102,933
Yavneh Day School$65,894
Jewish Federation of Silicon$42,166
Hillel of Silicon Valley$41,073
Temple Emanu-El$32,705
Stanford University$30,000
Northern Arizona University$30,000
MOUNTAIN PARKS FOUNDATION OF$25,000
Puente$25,000
Jewish Community Federation o$18,584
American Red Cross$15,000
Congregation Sinai of San Jos$11,947
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%The Fyera Foundation: $10k → 13%KAVOD (AMY ISRAEL PREGULMAN: $39k → 17%PENINSULA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $50k → 7%American Red Cross: $15k → 14%ADDISON PENZAK JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $164k → 8%Jewish Family Service: $163k → 8%ADDISON PENZAK JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $149k → 8%ADDISON PENZAK JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $144k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $132k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $120k → 8%ADDISON PENZAK JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $111k → 8%Addison-Penzak Jewish Communi: $103k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $94k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $66k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

29%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.9M · 20 repeat orgs$4.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2021, 10 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
18

Total granted

$1.9M
$326k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+20%

Still filing today

65%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 7% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
EducationHuman ServicesInternationalArts & CultureReligionPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF SILICON VALLEY
    5× · 2017–2021 · $575k · revenue +693%
  • HO
    HILLEL OF SILICON VALLEY INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $223k · revenue +86%
  • NA
    NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2021 · $123k · revenue +337%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO
    one grant, 2018 · $100k
  • PJ
    PENINSULA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +4%
  • K
    KAVODgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $39k · revenue +140%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
2
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
3
Jewish Federation of San Diego County

Jewish federation of san diego county is dedicated to building a vibrant, caring, connected, and enduring jewish community.

—
4
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
5
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
6
Irvine Hebrew Day School

Ihds utilizes a dual general and judaic studies curriculum. the judaic studies curriculum emphasizes the fundamentals of hebrew reading, writing and speaking, jewish history, holidays, jewish values, torah, the jewish life cycle, the land…

—
7
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
8
University of Judaism Foundation
—
9
Sherit Isroel
—
10
The Israel Institute Inc

The israel institute, inc. (the institute) enhances knowledge about modern israel by ensuring that more students have access to courses about israel during their time on campus.

International
11
Hillel 818

Hillel 818 is the campus hub for all things Jewish at Cal State Northridge, Pierce College, LA Valley College, and throughout the San Fernando Valley. We empower our 6,000+ Jewish students to forge lasting friendships, grow as leaders,…

—
12
Ashreinu Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose involves jewish education primarily to unaffiliated and minority or marginally affiliated jewish students on university campuses throughout southern california.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma and the most unlike its peers is The 5 Gyres Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr14%7%5–10yr20%13%10–20yr19%24%20–35yr15%27%35–55yr13%29%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr20%12%10–20yr19%15%20–35yr15%43%35–55yr13%30%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/53
the rest of the field
11%
6,076/55,398

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/41
Grantees still filing
30/41
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UBS Financial Services Inc G — $4,291,981 · OtherUBS Financial Services Inc GHILLEL OF SILICON VALLEY INC — $222,713 · Other+26 more — $672,397 · Other+26 moreJEWISH SILICON VALLEY — $670,705 · Human ServicesJEWISH SILICON VAL…JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF SILICON VALLEY — $574,567 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERV…PENINSULA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $50,000 · Human Services+3 more — $63,605 · Human ServicesTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC — $868,179 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH F…Levy Family Campus — $42,166 · Philanthropy+1 more — $28,584 · PhilanthropyYavneh Day School — $351,801 · EducationYavneh Day…NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $123,340 · EducationNORTHERN A…South Peninsula Hebrew Day School — $117,798 · EducationSouth Peni…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $113,000 · EducationTHE BOARD …+7 more — $80,000 · Education+7 moreCHAI HOUSE II INC — $72,080 · Housing & ShelterDestination Home SV co Silicon Valley Community Foundation — $5,000 · Housing & ShelterONETABLE INC — $43,750 · ReligionNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOVIET JEWRY — $10,000 · ReligionSILICON VALLEY JEWISH FILM FESTIVAL — $26,550 · Arts & CulturePUENTE DE LA COSTA SUR — $25,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$5,187,091Human Services$1,358,877Philanthropy$938,929Education$785,939Housing & Shelter$77,080Religion$53,750Arts & Culture$51,550

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC — $868,179 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH SILICON VALLEY — $670,705 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF SILICON VALLEY — $574,567 over 5y, 7.1% of budgetYavneh Day School — $351,801 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetHILLEL OF SILICON VALLEY INC — $222,713 over 5y, 8.1% of budgetNORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $123,340 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSouth Peninsula Hebrew Day School — $117,798 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $113,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOSHMAN FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $90,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHAI HOUSE II INC — $72,080 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetPENINSULA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetONETABLE INC — $43,750 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSanta Cruz Hillel Foundation — $42,500 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetLevy Family Campus — $42,166 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetKAVOD — $38,605 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetASSOCIATED STUDENTS OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY — $30,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA — $28,584 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSILICON VALLEY JEWISH FILM FESTIVAL — $26,550 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetPUENTE DE LA COSTA SUR — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMOUNTAIN PARKS FOUNDATION OF SANTA CRUZ — $25,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetIsrael Venture Network — $25,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KORET ISRAEL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUNDS — $20,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetB'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Burkard School — $15,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD C WORNICK JEWISH DAY SCHOOL — $12,254 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TOWER FOUNDATION OF SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOLD ON TO YOUR MUSIC INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOVIET JEWRY — $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetThe Fyera Foundation — $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetTHE MIDDLE EAST PEACE DIALOGUE NETWORK INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY — $9,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDestination Home SV co Silicon Valley Community Foundation — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF SAN JOSE FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF EDUCATION IN JAFFA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetYOGA FOR ALL MOVEMENT — $5,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetThe 5 Gyres Institute — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Fede…Jewish Silicon ValleySilicon Valley Commun…Taube Foundation for …Koret FoundationCombined Jewish Phila…The Somekh Family Fou…The Koum Family Found…Hopewell FundChai House IncArcadia FoundationDare Foundation
Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & SonomaCA28.9× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Jewish Silicon Valley · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Taube Foundation for Jewish Life and Culture · Koret Foundation · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · The Somekh Family Foundation · The Koum Family Foundation · Hopewell Fund · Chai House Inc · Arcadia Foundation · Dare Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Levy Family Campus funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Levy Family Campus?

    Find your warmest path to Levy Family Campus through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines