Skip to content

· Private foundation

Leuth Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$245k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Education$224kYouth Development$201kHuman Services$130kArts & Culture$80kRecreation & Sports$60kHousing & Shelter$50kFood & Nutrition$5k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $130k
$40,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STUDENT SPONSOR PARTNERSHIP INC$80,000
READING PARTNERS$50,000
Individual grant recipient$40,000
HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT$30,000
EMPOWERING DANCE FOUNDATION$25,000
BIGS & LITTLES NYC MENTORING$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $30k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $30k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$524k · 6 repeat orgs$226k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
9

Total granted

$524k
$161k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-13%
+17%

Still filing today

83%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
EducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    STUDENTSPONSOR PARTNERS INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $200k · revenue -13%
  • RP
    READING PARTNERS
    2× · 2023–2024 · $102k · revenue -15%
  • BL
    BIGS & LITTLES NYC MENTORING INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $70k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • YW
    YOUNG WOMAN'S TRANSITIONAL HOME
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • DP
    Dance Project Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +17%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sandhills School

Sandhills school is a 1st-12th grade college preparatory school for bright students with dyslexia and related learning differences. through individualized orton-gillingham instruction, our students gain the confidence, master the tools,…

—
2
School in the Square Public Charter School

School in the square ("s2") engages, educates and empowers adolescents to respond mindfully and creatively to life's opportunities and challenges. s2 is a place where students, families and educators are seen, heard, and inspired and where…

Education
3
Robert Louis Stevenson School

The robert louis stevenson school's mission is to provide a college preparatory program for bright adolescents who have not reached their potential in more traditional school settings. the program provides every student individually…

Education
4
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
5
Masters School

The masters school celebrates active participation, deep understanding, and meaningful connection. a community of diverse individuals, we gather to learn, to strive, to dare, to do - to be a power for good in the world.

—
6
Children's Aid College Prep Charter School

Prepare elementary & middle school students for success in high school, college & life.

Education
7
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
8
The New School

The new school's mission is to prepare our students to understand, contribute to, and succeed in a rapidly changing society, and thus make the world a better and more just place. (continued on schedule o)

Education
9
Darrow School

Darrow school is dedicated to serving students with diverse backgrounds and abilities, building on each student's talents and interests to inspire enduring confidence for success in college and life. this mission is accomplished through…

Education
10
Hillsdale College

Hillsdale college is a private liberal arts college with approximately 1,500 students. founded in 1844, the college remains, in the words of its articles of association, "grateful to god for the inestimable blessings resulting from the…

Education
11
Spartanburg Day School

The mission of the spartanburg day school is to provide a superior educational experience, in a community of trust, that prepares students for a life well lived. spartanburg day school is dually accredited by southern association of…

—
12
New York Institute for Special Education

The mission of the new york institute for special education is to provide quality educational programs and support to students and families in a safe caring environment to awaken and inspire student curiosity, lifelong learning and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Henry Street Settlement; the most unlike its peers is Dance Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STUDENTSPONSOR PARTNERS INC: $200,000 · EducationSTUDENTSPONSOR PARTNERS INCREADING PARTNERS: $102,000 · EducationREADING PARTNERSNova Southeastern University Inc: $15,035 · EducationSANDHILLS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL CORPORATION: $14,750 · EducationBIGS & LITTLES NYC MENTORING INC: $70,000 · OtherBIGS & LITTLES NYC MENTORING INCYOUNG WOMAN'S TRANSITIONAL HOME: $50,000 · OtherYOUNG WOMAN'S TRANSITIONAL HOMEIndividual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDANA PENA COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON: $31,739 · OtherDANA PENA COLLEGE OF CHARLESTONDance Project Inc: $30,000 · OtherDance Project IncEMPOWERING DANCE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherEMPOWERING DANCE FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · Other+1 more: $5,476 · OtherCONTINUOUS BLESSINGS FOUNDATION: $60,000 · Youth DevelopmentCONTINUOU…+1 more: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $60,000 · Human ServicesHENRY STR…SANDHILLS STUDENT ASSISTANCE INC: $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Education$331,785Other$292,215Youth Development$61,000Human Services$60,000Food & Nutrition$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTUDENTSPONSOR PARTNERS INC: $200,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetREADING PARTNERS: $102,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBIGS & LITTLES NYC MENTORING INC: $70,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetCONTINUOUS BLESSINGS FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 2y, 65% of budgetHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDance Project Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetNova Southeastern University Inc: $15,035 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANDHILLS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL CORPORATION: $14,750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSANDHILLS STUDENT ASSISTANCE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 35% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC9.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Leuth Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Leuth Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Nova Southeastern University Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Leuth Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph