Skip to content

· Private foundation

Leslie V & Stella Raymond Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$166k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$57k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$849kCommunity Improvement$532kYouth Development$70k
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $111k
$1,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Raymond School District$57,490
Various Public Organizations$53,700
Central Washington University$13,500
Various Youth Activities$9,624
Various Churches$6,600
Grays Harbor College$6,250
Eastern Washington University$3,000
Cornerstone University$2,500
Clover Park Technical College$1,500
Washington State University$1,500
Willamette University$1,500
Whitman College$1,500
University of Washington$1,500
University of Hawaii$1,000
Perry Technical Institute$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Cornerstone University: $10k → 11%Saint Martin's University: $9k → 9%Central Washington University: $14k → 11%Western Washington University: $7k → 12%Eastern Washington University: $9k → 12%Various Public Organizations: $111k → 14%Grays Harbor College: $17k → 18%Saint Martin's University: $4k → 9%Central Washington University: $9k → 11%Western Washington University: $4k → 12%Eastern Washington University: $9k → 12%Various Public Organizations: $98k → 14%Grays Harbor College: $6k → 18%University of Washington: $9k → 9%Central Washington University: $6k → 11%Eastern Washington University: $7k → 12%Raymond School District: $88k → 14%Grays Harbor College: $6k → 18%University of Washington: $6k → 9%Pacific Lutheran University: $5k → 9%Central Washington University: $5k → 11%Eastern Washington University: $6k → 12%Raymond School District: $81k → 14%Grays Harbor College: $6k → 18%Raymond School District: $81k → 14%Raymond School District: $79k → 14%Raymond School District: $66k → 14%Various Public Organizations: $63k → 14%Raymond School District: $57k → 14%Various Public Organizations: $54k → 14%Raymond School District: $49k → 14%Various Public Organizations: $44k → 14%Various Public Organizations: $40k → 14%Various Public Organizations: $38k → 14%Various Public Organizations: $36k → 14%Raymond School District: $31k → 14%Various Youth Activities: $23k → 14%Various Youth Activities: $16k → 14%Various Churches: $13k → 14%Various Youth Activities: $10k → 14%Various Churches: $7k → 14%Various Churches: $7k → 14%Various Youth Activities: $6k → 14%Various Churches: $6k → 14%Various Churches: $6k → 14%Various Churches: $5k → 14%Various Churches: $5k → 14%Various Youth Activities: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MI
NY
OR
CA
UT
CO
AZ
HI
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 21 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +3% since the first grant, against -24% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
12

Total granted

$1.4M
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
-24%

Still filing today

24%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    SAINT MARTIN'S UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2017–2021 · $17k · revenue +68%
  • PL
    Pacific Lutheran University
    3× · 2017–2019 · $7k · revenue +3%
  • GC
    Grand Canyon University
    2× · 2023–2024 · $3k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • UV
    UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $4k
  • AS
    Arizona State University
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • BT
    Bellingham Technical College
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
3
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
4
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
5
Seattle University

Seattle University is dedicated to educating the whole person, to professional formation, and to empowering leaders for a just and humane world.

—
6
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
7
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
8
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
9
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
10
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
11
Nebraska Wesleyan University

Nebraska wesleyan university is an academic community dedicated to intellectual and personal growth within the context of a liberal arts education and in an environment of christian concern.

Education
12
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Willamette University; the most unlike its peers is Grays Harbor College Federation of Teachers. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Raymond School District: $532,170 · OtherRaymond School DistrictVarious Public Organizations: $483,181 · OtherVarious Public OrganizationsVarious Youth Activities: $69,875 · OtherVarious Churches: $49,200 · Other+26 more: $214,297 · Other+26 moreSAINT MARTIN'S UNIVERSITY: $17,000 · EducationCornerstone University: $15,833 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $9,000 · EducationPacific Lutheran University: $6,500 · EducationGrand Canyon University: $2,500 · Education+3 more: $4,500 · EducationGRAYS HARBOR COLLEGE FEDERATION OF TEACHERS: $47,582 · Employment
Other$1,348,723Education$55,333Employment$47,582

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGRAYS HARBOR COLLEGE FEDERATION OF TEACHERS: $47,582 over 8y, 8.4% of budgetSAINT MARTIN'S UNIVERSITY: $17,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCornerstone University: $15,833 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $9,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPacific Lutheran University: $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGrand Canyon University: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOARD OF TRUSTEES OF WHITMAN COLLEGE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHITWORTH UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GRAYS HARBOR COLLEGE FEDERATION OF TEACHERS ↗
  • Who funds SAINT MARTIN'S UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Cornerstone University ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Pacific Lutheran University ↗
  • Who funds Grand Canyon University ↗
  • Who funds BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF WHITMAN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Leslie V & Stella Raymond Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Leslie V & Stella Raymond Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Willamette University: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Leslie V & Stella Raymond Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Leslie V & Stella Raymond Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Leslie V & Stella Raymond’s filings →

More from the funding graph