Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lesh-Hammersley Manpower Memorial Trust Dtd 12/21/98

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 86% of LESH-HAMMERSLEY MANPOWER MEMORIAL TRUST DTD 12/21/98’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$70k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST FRANCIS OF ASSISI EPISCOPAL CHURCH$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $400) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%BOYS TOWN: $200 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $200 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$81k · 9 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against -20% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
10

Total granted

$81k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
-20%

Still filing today

56%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalArts & CultureCrime & LegalReligionHuman ServicesHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    Childrens Center
    2× · 2017–2018 · $5k · revenue +68%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $2k · revenue +89%
  • WF
    WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL
    3× · 2017–2019 · $2k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • CC
    CHILDREN'S CANCER ASSOCIATION OF OREGON
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • LG
    LAKE GROVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • CC
    Children's Cancer Association
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -32%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Children's Home Inc

Provides residential and community services to promote long-term well-being and success for young people and families who experience disruption in their lives.

Human Services
2
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
3
The District of Columbia Children's Advocacy Center

Safe shores provides survivor-centered intervention, hope and healing for children and families affected by abuse, trauma and violence in the district of columbia, and works to prevent and end child abuse and neglect through promising…

Crime & Legal
4
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
5
Childsafe Colorado Inc

Mission: our mission is to break the cycle and heal the childhood trauma resulting from abuse and neglect with specialized treatment, education and community outreach. we believe in a comprehensive, community-based approach to the problem…

Crime & Legal
6
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
7
Precious Kids Center

Located in kitale, kenya, the precious kids center ("pkc") serves children with disabilities to provide the support they need to learn, grow, and reach their full potential. each child is cared for according to their individual needs.…

International
8
Global Strategies

Global Strategies empowers communities in the most neglected areas of the world to improve the lives of women and children through healthcare.

Health
9
The Center for Victims of Torture

The center for victims of torture works to heal the wounds of torture on individuals, their families and their communities and to stop torture worldwide.

International
10
Boys and Girls Village Inc

Boys and girls village serves children and families in at-risk situations by strengthening their ability to succeed in life.

Human Services
11
Lalmba Association

We engage with rural communities in africa by providing life-saving medical services, transformative education and empowerment opportunities, and support for at-risk and vulnerable populations to help build healthy, sustainable, and…

International
12
Covenant House

In 34 cities across five countries, covenant house builds bridges to hope for young people facing homelessness and survivors of human trafficking. we meet their immediate needs for food, clothing, protection, and medical and mental health…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc and the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST FRANCIS OF ASSISI EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $42,400 · OtherST FRANCIS OF ASSISI EPISCOPAL CHURCHRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE — $20,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSEMAKE A WISH — $7,000 · OtherMAKE A WISHCHILDREN'S CANCER ASSOCIATION OF OREGON — $5,000 · OtherLAKE GROVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL — $5,000 · OtherUNION GOSPEL MISSION — $4,900 · OtherOHSU FOUNDATION — $4,000 · Other+5 more — $6,500 · Other+5 moreChildren's Cancer Association — $5,000 · Arts & CultureChildrens Center — $4,700 · Crime & LegalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,700 · InternationalWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL — $1,550 · InternationalVISIBLE GRACE INC — $1,250 · ReligionFather Flanagan's Boys' Home — $400 · Human ServicesMARCH OF DIMES INC — $200 · Health
Other$94,800Arts & Culture$5,000Crime & Legal$4,700International$3,250Religion$1,250Human Services$400Health$200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetChildrens Center — $4,700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBraking Cycles — $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL — $1,550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVISIBLE GRACE INC — $1,250 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home — $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Children's Cancer Association
  • Who funds Childrens Center
  • Who funds Braking Cycles
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds VISIBLE GRACE INC
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lesh-Hammersley Manpower Memorial Trust Dtd 12/21/98 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Childrens Center0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph