Skip to content
Leipold Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Leipold Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$23k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$52kHuman Services$23kPublic Safety & Disaster$15kFood & Nutrition$7kYouth Development$7kPhilanthropy$5kReligion$3kEnvironment$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$58k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY$8,000
HAMDEN KEEF CTR FOOD BANK$2,500
FLEET LANDING ENDOWMENT FUND$2,000
SALVATION ARMY$2,000
BEACHES EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE$2,000
CHARTER OAK STATE CLGE FDN$1,500
WHERE LOVE IS PET RESCUE$1,500
HAMDEN KEEF CTR YOUTH SVC$1,500
Individual grant recipient$882
COAST GUARD FOUNDATION$750
THE GREEN PEACOCK$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HAMDEN KEEF CTR YOUTH SVC: $2k → 11%BEACHES EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE: $3k → 14%PASS IT ON MINISTRIES: $1k → 15%COAST GUARD FOUNDATION: $750 → 9%CHARTER OAK COLLEGE FUND: $5k → 11%POST UNIVERSITY: $2k → 12%EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY: $8k → 20%KEEFE CENTER YOUTH CENTER: $2k → 11%BEACHES EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE: $3k → 14%PASS IT ON MINISTRIES: $1k → 15%COAST GUARD FOUNDATION: $500 → 9%CHARTER OAK COLLEGE FUND: $5k → 11%POST UNIVERSITY: $2k → 12%EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY: $8k → 20%NEW ENGLAND SYNOD ELCA: $500 → 11%BEACHES EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE: $3k → 14%GATEWAY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $5k → 12%BEACHES EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE: $2k → 14%CHARTER OAK STATE CLGE FDN: $2k → 11%HAMDEN KEEF CTR FOOD BANK: $3k → 12%BEACHES EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE: $2k → 14%KEEFE CENTER GIFT FUND: $3k → 12%FLEET LANDING ENDOWMENT FUND: $2k → 14%HAMDEN YOUTH SERVICE: $3k → 12%FLEET LANDING ENDOWMENT FUND: $2k → 14%KEEFE CENTER GIFT FUND: $2k → 12%ST JOHN'S RIVER KEEPER: $750 → 14%KEEFE CENTER FOOD BANK: $2k → 12%FLEET LANDING ENDOWMENT FUND: $2k → 14%HAMDEN CENTER FOOD BANK: $2k → 12%ST JOHN'S RIVER KEEPER: $750 → 14%HAMDEN YOUTH SERVICE: $1k → 12%FLEET LANDING ENDOWMENT FUND: $2k → 14%HAMDEN CENTER FOOD BANK: $1k → 12%FLEET LANDING ENDOWMENT FUND: $2k → 14%WHERE LOVE IS PET RESCUE: $2k → 12%FSCI ARTIST SERIES: $1k → 14%GATEWAY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $10k → 12%FSCI ARTIST SERIES: $1k → 14%GATEWAY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $7k → 12%FSCI ARTIST SERIES: $1k → 14%PBS NPR W SET: $1k → 14%FSCI ARTIST SERIES: $882 → 14%SALVATION ARMY: $3k → 14%SALVATION ARMY: $3k → 14%SALVATION ARMY: $3k → 14%SALVATION ARMY: $2k → 14%SALVATION ARMY: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$108k · 16 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
4

Total granted

$108k
$5k

Still filing today

19%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyPublic BenefitEnvironmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FL
    Fleet landing Endowment Fund Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $10k · revenue +94%
  • CG
    COAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $2k · revenue +130%
  • SJ
    ST JOHNS RIVERKEEPER INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $2k · revenue +73%

Funded once

  • KC
    KEEFE CENTER YOUTH CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • KC
    KEEFE CENTER FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • PN
    PBS NPR W SET
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
3/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GATEWAY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $21,000 · OtherGATEWAY COMMUNITY COLLEGEEAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY: $16,000 · OtherEAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITYBEACHES EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE: $12,500 · OtherBEACHES EMERGENCY ASSISTANCESALVATION ARMY: $12,500 · OtherSALVATION ARMYCHARTER OAK COLLEGE FUND: $9,000 · OtherCHARTER OAK COLLEGE FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $4,632 · OtherKEEFE CENTER GIFT FUND: $4,500 · OtherPOST UNIVERSITY: $4,000 · Other+13 more: $21,500 · Other+13 moreFleet landing Endowment Fund Inc: $10,000 · PhilanthropyFleet lan…COAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC: $2,250 · Public BenefitST JOHNS RIVERKEEPER INC: $2,000 · EnvironmentTHE GREEN PEACOCK CORPORATION: $500 · Health
Other$105,632Philanthropy$10,000Public Benefit$2,250Environment$2,000Health$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFleet landing Endowment Fund Inc: $10,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetCOAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC: $2,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST JOHNS RIVERKEEPER INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Fleet landing Endowment Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds COAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JOHNS RIVERKEEPER INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Leipold Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Leipold Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Leipold Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Leipold Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Leipold’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home