Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Lehigh Valley Economic Development Corporation (Lvedc)

The mission of the lehigh valley economic development corporation is to market the economic assets of the lehigh valley and to create partnerships to support the recruitment, growth and retention of employers, and the creation of jobs for people of all skill and education levels.

$32k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What you fund
0186% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

Arts & Culture$4.0MPhilanthropy$22kEducation$17kCommunity Improvement$15kOther$662k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $27,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $32,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $5,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$27,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEHIGH VALLEY ECONOMIC INVESTMENT CORPORATION$27,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%GREATER EASTON DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP: $5k → 11%GREATER LEHIGH VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%GREATER EASTON DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP: $5k → 11%GREATER LEHIGH VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%GREATER EASTON DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP: $5k → 11%GREATER LEHIGH VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%LEHIGH UNIVERSITY SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $17k → 11%MANUFACTURERS RESOURCE CENTER: $32k → 11%MANUFACTURERS RESOURCE CENTER: $19k → 11%THE WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY: $466k → 11%DA VINCI SCIENCE CENTER: $2.0M → 11%DA VINCI SCIENCE CENTER: $2.0M → 11%WORKFORCE BOARD LEHIGH VALLEY: $22k → 11%LEHIGH VALLEY ECONOMIC INVESTMENT CORPORATION: $27k → 11%LEHIGH VALLEY ECONOMIC INVESTMENT CORPORATION: $27k → 11%LEHIGH VALLEY ECONOMIC INVESTMENT CORPORATION: $27k → 11%CITY OF BETHLEHEM: $19k → 11%BETHLEHEM ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $5k → 11%BETHLEHEM ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $5k → 11%BETHLEHEM ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.2M · 6 repeat orgs$523k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
4

Total granted

$4.2M
$523k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+18%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TD
    THE DA VINCI DISCOVERY CENTER OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $4.0M · revenue +592% · 67% of their budget
  • LV
    LEHIGH VALLEY ECONOMIC INVESTMENT CORP
    3× · 2022–2024 · $81k · revenue +55%
  • MR
    MANUFACTURERS RESOURCE CENTER
    2× · 2022–2023 · $51k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • TW
    THE WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
    one grant, 2021 · $466k
  • LV
    LEHIGH VALLEY WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD INC
    one grant, 2023 · $22k · revenue +17%
  • CO
    CITY OF BETHLEHEM
    one grant, 2017 · $19k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh Valley Economic Development Corporation (Lvedc)

The mission of the lehigh valley economic development corporation is to market the economic assets of the lehigh valley and to create partnerships to support the recruitment, growth and retention of employers, and the creation of jobs for…

Community Improvement
2
Greater Erie Economic Development Corporation
3
Greater Lehigh Valley Chamber of Commerce

To improve the economy and quality of communities in the lehigh valley metropolitan area.

4
Allentown Economic Development Corporation

To proactively identify, encourage, manage and develop strategic business opportunities for the benefit of allentown, its citizens, and the lehigh valley.

Community Improvement
5
Delaware and Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Inc

See schedule oper the bylaws of the delaware & lehigh national heritage corridor(which were updated by the merged board of the national canal musuem and the d&l), our mission is to work with government entities, non-profit organizations…

Arts & Culture
6
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

7
Private Industry Council of Lehigh Valley Inc

In response to business needs and to support pennsylvanians with disabilities to achieve greater independence, choice and opportunity, private industry council of the lehigh valley, inc. (pic) provides job placement and employment…

Employment
8
Chamber of Commerce for Greater Philadephia

The chamber of commerce for greater philadelphia (the chamber) brings area businesses and civic leaders together to promote growth and create opportunity in our region. our members represent eleven counties, three states, and roughly…

9
Lansing Economic Area Partnership

We build a stronger community for all, working everyday to grow, retain and attract business to the region.

Community Improvement
10
Lebanon Valley Economic Development Corporation

Continuing study of economic development, site identification and development, and industrial solicitation in a continuing effort to revitalize the local business sector.

Community Improvement
11
Lehigh Valley Industrial Park Inc

Create jobs, expand the regional tax base, diversify the local economy and to promote the economic vitality and enhance the quality of life in the lehigh valley.

12
Lehigh Valley Inter-Regional Networking & Connecting Consortium

Supporting employers in their efforts to attract and restain diverse talent by providing information and resources through personal and professional connections, easing transition in the the lehigh valley

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lehigh Valley Economic Investment Corp and the most unlike its peers is The Da Vinci Discovery Center of Science and Technology Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE DA VINCI DISCOVERY CENTER OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INC — $3,996,000 · Arts & CultureTHE DA VINCI DISCOVERY CENTER OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INCTHE WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY — $466,250 · OtherTHE WATERFRONT …LEHIGH VALLEY ECONOMIC INVESTMENT CORP — $81,000 · OtherLEHIGH VALLEY E…MANUFACTURERS RESOURCE CENTER — $50,925 · OtherMANUFACTURERS R…GREATER LEHIGH VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION — $30,000 · Other+2 more — $34,025 · OtherLEHIGH VALLEY WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD INC — $21,698 · PhilanthropyLEHIGH UNIVERSITY — $16,500 · EducationGreater Easton Development Partnership — $15,000 · Community Improvement
Arts & Culture$3,996,000Other$662,200Philanthropy$21,698Education$16,500Community Improvement$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE DA VINCI DISCOVERY CENTER OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INC — $3,996,000 over 2y, 67% of budgetLEHIGH VALLEY ECONOMIC INVESTMENT CORP — $81,000 over 3y, 23% of budgetMANUFACTURERS RESOURCE CENTER — $50,925 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetGREATER LEHIGH VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetLEHIGH VALLEY WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD INC — $21,698 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLEHIGH UNIVERSITY — $16,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGreater Easton Development Partnership — $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBETHLEHEM ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $15,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Air Products FoundationPA15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Air Products Foundation · Lehigh Valley Community Foundation · United Way of the Greater Lehigh Valley · Ppl Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lehigh Valley Economic Development Corporation (Lvedc) funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph