Skip to content
Leesburg Regional Medical Center Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Leesburg Regional Medical Center Inc

As a part of UF Health, the organization's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic, translational and clinical investigation.

$191k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$191k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$2.1MEducation$50kCommunity Improvement$14kArts & Culture$7k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$190,516
Median grant
1
States reached
$215M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY MEDICAL CARE CENTER OF LEESBURG INC$190,516
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FLORIDA ESSENTIAL HEALTHCARE PARTNERSHIPS FOUNDATION: $1.1M → 10%THE VILLAGES CHARTER SCHOOL: $10k → 9%Community Medical Care Center of Leesburg INC: $191k → 10%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $14k → 12%THE VILLAGES CHARTER SCHOOL: $10k → 9%Community Medical Care Center of Leesburg INC: $191k → 10%THE VILLAGES CHARTER SCHOOL: $10k → 9%COMMUNITY MEDICAL CARE CENTER OF LEESBURG INC: $191k → 10%Community Medical Care Center of Leesburg INC: $191k → 10%COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP OF LEESBURG AND VICINITY: $5k → 10%UF HEALTH THE VILLAGES AUXILIARY FOUNDATION: $17k → 10%The Villages Regional Hospital Auxiliary Inc: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

39%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$839k · 3 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +129% since the first grant, against +101% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
6

Total granted

$839k
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+129%
+101%

Still filing today

100%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    Community Medical Care Center of Leesburg Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $762k · revenue +15% · 47% of their budget
  • TV
    THE VILLAGES CHARTER SCHOOL INC
    4× · 2017–2021 · $50k · revenue +530%
  • TV
    The Villages Regional Hospital Auxiliary Inc
    2× · 2020–2021 · $27k · revenue +129%

Funded once

  • FE
    Florida Essential Healthcare Partnerships Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1.1M · revenue +102%
  • LB
    Lifestream Behavioral Center Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $125k · revenue +36%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $14k · revenue +53%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Leesburg Regional Medical Center Inc

As a part of UF Health, the organization's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across…

Health
2
Florida Community Health Centers Inc

Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.

—
3
Leesburg Regional Medical Center Foundation Inc

The organization's mission is to support UF Health promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the…

Health
4
Community Health Centers Inc

The mission of community health centers is to provide quality and compassionate primary healthcare services to central florida's diverse communities.

—
5
Lakeland Regional Medical Center Inc

See Schedule OLakeland Regional Health's strategic imperative is to develop as a nationally recognized, fiscally strong and growing collaborative regional health system that improves lives by offering safe, high quality, equitable and…

Health
6
University of Florida Health Corporation

UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…

—
7
North Florida Medical Centers Inc

To increase access to quality healthcare and improve the overall health of the community.

Health
8
The Villages Tri-County Medical Center Inc

As a part of UF Health, the organization's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across…

Health
9
Carolinas Center for Medical Excellence Found ation
Health
10
Southeast Community Health Systems

The mission of Southeast Community Health Systems is to provide quality, affordable healthcare to all patients in underserved areas and to improve the health and wellness of the communities we serve.

—
11
Treasure Coast Community Health Inc

To provide patient-centered, integrated outpatient care in a technologically advanced, financially secure and compassionate environment. to be a valued leader in primary health care, improving the quality of life in indian river county…

Health
12
Community Clinic Services Inc

To support the establishment and continuation of health care facilities located in rural and urban areas designated as a shortage area or that have a medically underserved population; to further the complementary missions of escambia…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Villages Regional Hospital Auxiliary Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Florida Essential Healthcare Partnerships Foundation Inc: $1,144,050 · HealthFlorida Essential Healthcare Partnerships Foundation IncCommunity Medical Care Center of Leesburg Inc: $762,064 · HealthCommunity Medical Care Center of Leesburg IncLifestream Behavioral Center Inc: $125,000 · HealthLifestream Behavioral Center Inc+2 more: $40,250 · HealthTHE VILLAGES CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $50,000 · EducationLEESBURG AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC: $8,500 · OtherCENTER FOR THE ARTS: $6,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF LEESBURG INC: $5,000 · Community Improvement
Health$2,071,364Education$50,000Other$15,000Community Improvement$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFlorida Essential Healthcare Partnerships Foundation Inc: $1,144,050 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCommunity Medical Care Center of Leesburg Inc: $762,064 over 4y, 47% of budgetLifestream Behavioral Center Inc: $125,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE VILLAGES CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $50,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThe Villages Regional Hospital Auxiliary Inc: $26,500 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $13,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEESBURG AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC: $8,500 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF LEESBURG INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

The Villages Tri-Coun…
The Villages Tri-County Medical Center IncFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Villages Tri-County Medical Center Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Leesburg Regional Medical Center Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Leesburg Regional Medical Center Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Lifestream Behavioral Center Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Leesburg Regional Medical Center’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home