Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lee Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$16k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$102kScience & Tech$50kHealth$38kHuman Services$21kInternational$12kCivil Rights$540
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$4,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$452k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PERFORMING ARTS CENTER EASTSIDE$10,000
PLUS CHARITABLE TRUST$4,500
KIN ON$1,000
Individual grant recipient$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%KEIRO NORTHWEST: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

50%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$119k · 5 repeat orgs$121k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +129% since the first grant, against +55% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
13

Total granted

$119k
$111k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+129%
+55%

Still filing today

60%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2017–2020 · $49k
  • KO
    KIN ON HEALTH CARE CENTER
    5× · 2017–2025 · $21k · revenue +129%
  • SA
    SEATTLE ART MUSEUM
    4× · 2018–2022 · $20k · revenue -30%

Funded once

  • PS
    PACIFIC SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue -24%
  • TP
    TSTEUCHI PERFORMING CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chinese American Arts Council Incorporated

To preserve and maintain the cultural identity of chinese immigrants and expose chinese art and contemporary masters of traditional art forms to the general public.

Arts & Culture
2
Asian Art Museum Foundation of San Francisco

The asian art museum celebrates, preserves, and promotes asian and asian american art and cultures for local and global audiences. we provide a dynamic forum for exchanging ideas, inviting collaboration, and fueling imagination to deepen…

Arts & Culture
3
Asian Hall of Fame

To educate the public about asian contributions to the united states and the rest of the world, promote asian artistic excellence and cross-cultural narratives, and enhance career opportunities for asians by raising public awareness of…

Arts & Culture
4
Korean American National Museum Inc

Preserve and interpret the history, experiences, culture and achievements of americans of korean ancestry.

Arts & Culture
5
Center for Contemporary Art & Culture

To enliven and expand the understanding of craft and the museum experience for all.

Arts & Culture
6
Korean American Culture and Arts Inc

To expand cultural exchange through exhibitions, performances, fashion shows,culinary events, distribution of publications, and other artistic endeavors between korea and the united states

Arts & Culture
7
Mingei International Inc

Mingei International Museum connects audiences with the creativity and cultural traditions of makers across time and the globe, fostering a deeper understanding and appreciation of our shared humanity through handmade objects, and the…

Arts & Culture
8
Museum of Northwest Art

The museum of northwest art collects, preserves, interprets and exhibits art created in the pacific northwest, supports artists, and strives to integrate art into the lives of all people. the museum is free and open to the public seven…

Arts & Culture
9
Aquarium of the Pacific Corporation

The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.

Animals
10
Silk Screen

To celebrate diversity and multi-cultural appreciation of the asian and asian american experience through cultural events.

—
11
Chinese Community Center Inc

The chinese community center's mission is to bridge east & west by enriching families with educational, cultural, and social programs.

Human Services
12
Friends of the Chinese American Museum

To foster a deeper understanding and appreciation of america's diverse heritage by researching, preserving, and sharing the history, rich cultural legacy, and continuing contributions of chinese americans.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kin On Health Care Center; the most unlike its peers is Plus Charitable Trust Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $49,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTSTEUCHI PERFORMING CENTER: $20,000 · OtherTSTEUCHI PERFORMING CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $13,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientASIAN HALL OF FAME: $11,700 · OtherASIAN HALL OF FAMEPACIFIC NW CULTURAL EXCHANGE COUNCI: $10,000 · OtherPACIFIC NW CULTURAL EXCHANGE COUNCIIndividual grant recipient: $9,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+6 more: $3,590 · OtherPACIFIC SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Arts & CulturePACIFIC SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATIONSEATTLE ART MUSEUM: $20,000 · Arts & CultureSEATTLE ART MUSEUMPERFORMING ARTS CENTER EASTSIDE: $10,000 · Arts & CulturePERFORMING ARTS CENTER EASTSIDE+2 more: $900 · Arts & CultureKIN ON HEALTH CARE CENTER: $21,000 · HealthKIN ON HE…PLUS CHARITABLE TRUST INC: $16,600 · PhilanthropyKEIRO NORTHWEST: $4,500 · Human Services
Other$116,690Arts & Culture$80,900Health$21,000Philanthropy$16,600Human Services$4,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPACIFIC SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKIN ON HEALTH CARE CENTER: $21,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSEATTLE ART MUSEUM: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPLUS CHARITABLE TRUST INC: $16,600 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetPERFORMING ARTS CENTER EASTSIDE: $10,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetKEIRO NORTHWEST: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF CHINESE IN AMERICA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ASIAN PERFORMING ARTS: $400 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PACIFIC SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KIN ON HEALTH CARE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds PLUS CHARITABLE TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds PERFORMING ARTS CENTER EASTSIDE ↗
  • Who funds KEIRO NORTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF CHINESE IN AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ASIAN PERFORMING ARTS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lee Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lee Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lee Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph