Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lcv Down and Dirty Mud Run Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$11kYouth Development$7kHuman Services$4kHealth$3kEducation$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$2k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$900
Median grant
2
States reached
$8k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IDAHO YOUTH CHALLENGE ACADEMY$1,000
NORTHWEST CHILDREN'S HOME$1,000
ASOTIN HIGH SCHOOL SOFTBALL$900
Individual grant recipient$900
Individual grant recipient$900
Individual grant recipient$730
YOUNG LIFE$500
ASOTIN COUNTY FIRE DEPT$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 38% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%CASA: $3k → 11%IDAHO YOUTH CHALLENGE ACADEMY: $3k → 15%ASOTIN COUNTY FIRE DEPT: $1k → 16%TAMMANY SCHOOL: $2k → 11%IDAHO YOUTH CHALLENGE ACADEMY: $1k → 15%CLARKSTON BOYS BASKETBALL: $995 → 16%AMERICAN WARFIGHTERS: $2k → 11%CHS BASKETBALL: $900 → 16%LEWISTON ROUNDUP: $2k → 11%CHS BASKETBALL: $900 → 16%GREEN APPLE PROJECT: $2k → 11%TRI-STATE FOUNDATION: $500 → 16%LEWISTON ROUNDUP: $2k → 11%LEWIS CLARK VALLEY YOUNG LIFE: $500 → 16%WARHORSE EQUINE SERVICES: $2k → 11%ASOTIN COUNTY FIRE DEPT: $500 → 16%NORTHWEST CHILDREN'S HOME: $1k → 11%YOUNG LIFE: $500 → 16%LC VALLEY RESOURCE CENTER: $1k → 11%ASOTIN COUNTY FIRE DEPT: $500 → 16%LCSC CROSS COUNTRY: $730 → 11%YOUNG LIFE: $500 → 16%LEWISTON HIGH SCHOOL CROSS COUNTRY: $500 → 11%ASOTIN HIGH SCHOOL SOFTBALL: $1k → 16%ASOTIN CROSS COUNTRY: $1k → 16%ASOTIN CROSS COUNTRY: $900 → 16%ASOTIN CROSS COUNTRY: $900 → 16%ASOTIN HIGH SCHOOL SOFTBALL: $900 → 16%ASOTIN HIGH SCHOOL SOFTBALL: $900 → 16%ASOTIN CROSS COUNTRY: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$18k · 7 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
10

Total granted

$18k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
0%

Still filing today

14%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Public BenefitHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2022–2023 · $4k
  • IY
    IDAHO YOUTH CHALLENGE ACADEMY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2022–2025 · $3k

Funded once

  • C
    CASA
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • AW
    AMERICAN WARFIGHTERS
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • TG
    THE GREEN APPLE PROJECT
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue -35%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/4
Grantees still filing
1/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $4,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIDAHO YOUTH CHALLENGE ACADEMY: $3,500 · OtherIDAHO YOUTH CHALLENGE ACADEMYIndividual grant recipient: $3,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipientASOTIN HIGH SCHOOL SOFTBALL: $2,800 · OtherASOTIN HIGH SCHOOL SOFTBALLCASA: $2,500 · OtherCASAASOTIN COUNTY FIRE DEPT: $2,000 · OtherASOTIN COUNTY FIRE DEPTTAMMANY SCHOOL: $2,000 · OtherTAMMANY SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $1,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWARHORSE EQUINE SERVICES: $1,500 · OtherNORTHWEST CHILDRENS HOME: $1,000 · OtherLC VALLEY RESOURCE CENTER: $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $995 · Other+4 more: $2,230 · Other+4 moreAMERICAN WARFIGHTERS: $2,000 · Public BenefitTHE GREEN APPLE PROJECT: $2,000 · HealthYOUNG LIFE: $1,000 · Youth Development
Other$28,625Public Benefit$2,000Health$2,000Youth Development$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN WARFIGHTERS: $2,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetTHE GREEN APPLE PROJECT: $2,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetNORTHWEST CHILDRENS HOME: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN WARFIGHTERS ↗
  • Who funds THE GREEN APPLE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST CHILDRENS HOME ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lcv Down and Dirty Mud Run Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lcv Down and Dirty Mud Run Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lcv Down and Dirty Mud Run’s filings →

    More from the funding graph