Skip to content

· Public charity

Las Vegas Events Inc

Advancing of commercial interests in state of nevada by encouraging and promoting special events, which will stimulate tourism, commerce, trade and business in southern nevada.

$4.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$960k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Community Improvement$15MRecreation & Sports$11M
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 19 grants below total $4,360,791, the rows itemized in this filing. The $4,849,302 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $488,511 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $124k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $959k
  • $250k+6 grants · $3.3M
$110,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRUCCI FIREWORKS$959,970
FREMONT STREET EXPERIENCE$645,000
US BOWLING CONGRESS$573,340
EDGEWATER GAMING$500,000
MOUNTAIN WEST CONFERENCE$300,000
WEST COAST CONFERENCE$300,000
MESQUITE RESORT ASSOCIATION$208,500
COMPETITOR GROUP INC$150,000
WORLD SERIES OF TEAM ROPING$150,000
LAUGHLIN TOURISM COMMISSION$110,000
GROUP W PRODUCTIONS LLC$100,000
LIFE IS BEAUTIFUL LLC$75,000
SENIOR SOFTBALL USA$65,000
INDIAN NATIONAL FINALS RODEO$50,000
THE NATIONAL BOWLING ASSOCIATION$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 54% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%WCC: $300k → 7%PAC 12: $500k → 9%NEW YEAR'S EVE (GRUCCI FIREWORKS): $1.1M → 7%USA SEVENS RUGBY: $250k → 9%US BOWLING CONGRESS: $948k → 11%WORLD SERIES OF TEAM ROPING: $150k → 14%COMPETITOR GROUP INC: $150k → 13%MT WEST CONFERENCE BBALL TOURNAMENT: $830k → 9%NBA PROPERTIES INC (SUMMER LEAGUE): $600k → 14%WEST COAST CONFERENCE: $300k → 7%PAC 12: $500k → 9%GRUCCI FIREWORKS: $960k → 7%USA SEVENS RUGBY: $250k → 9%US BOWLING CONGRESS: $573k → 11%COMPETITOR GROUP INC: $150k → 13%MT WEST CONFERENCE BBALL TOURNAMENT: $501k → 9%NBA PROPERTIES INC (SUMMER LEAGUE): $250k → 14%WEST COAST CONFERENCE: $300k → 7%PAC 12: $500k → 9%NEW YEAR'S EVE (GRUCCI FIREWORKS): $838k → 7%US BOWLING CONGRESS: $517k → 11%COMPETITOR GROUP INC: $150k → 13%MT WEST CONFERENCE BBALL TOURNAMENT: $300k → 9%WEST COAST CONFERENCE: $300k → 7%PAC 12: $500k → 9%LAS VEGAS MARATHON (COMPETITOR GROUP): $150k → 11%NEW YEAR'S EVE (GRUCCI FIREWORKS): $695k → 7%US BOWLING CONGRESS: $267k → 11%MOUNTAIN WEST CONFERENCE: $300k → 9%EDGEWATER GAMING: $500k → 13%WCC: $300k → 7%LAS VEGAS MARATHON (COMPETITOR GROUP): $150k → 11%NEW YEAR'S EVE (GRUCCI FIREWORKS): $605k → 7%MT WEST CONFERENCE BBALL TOURNAMENT: $300k → 9%BULLHEAD AIRSHOW (LAUGHLIN TOURISM COMMISSION): $138k → 13%LAUGHLIN FIREWORKS (LAUGHLIN TOURISM COMMISSION): $125k → 13%LAUGHLIN - LUKE BRYAN CONCERT (EDGEWATER GAMING LLC): $125k → 13%MESQUITE RESORT ASSOCIATION: $209k → 13%FREMONT STREET EXPERIENCE: $645k → 13%FREMONT STREET EXPERIENCE (THE EVENTS): $366k → 13%FREMONT STREET EXPERIENCE - THE EVENTS: $325k → 13%FREMONT STREET EXPERIENCE - THE EVENTS: $325k → 13%FREMONT STREET EXPERIENCE (THE EVENTS): $321k → 13%LIFE IS BEAUTIFUL: $150k → 13%LIFE IS BEAUTIFUL: $150k → 13%FREMONT STREET EXPERIENCE (ADDITIONAL EVENTS): $150k → 13%FREMONT STREET EXPERIENCE: $125k → 13%FREMONT STREET EXPERIENCE (DOWNTOWN HOEDOWN): $125k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
ND
MI
NY
NV
OH
NJ
CA
CO
AZ
NM
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$25M · 27 repeat orgs$441k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
5

Total granted

$25M
$420k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+15%

Still filing today

22%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • US
    UNITED STATES BOWLING CONGRESS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.4M · revenue +41%
  • MW
    MOUNTAIN WEST CONFERENCE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.2M · revenue +183%
  • LT
    LAUGHLIN TOURISM COMMISSION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +131% · 79% of their budget

Funded once

  • UI
    UFC INT'L FIGHT WEEK (ZUFFA LLC)
    3× · 2017–2020 · $150k
  • RA
    RE ARENA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • EM
    EMERGE MUSIC CONFERENCE
    one grant, 2018 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Big West Conference

The purpose is to maintain intercollegiate athletics as an integral part of the education program and the athlete as an integral part of the student body and by doing so, retain a clear line of demarcation between college athletics and…

—
2
Western Athletic Conference

The conference is committed to providing student-athletes an exemplary university experience - both on and off the field of play. with high standards of integrity at the core of our athletic and academic excellences, our goal is to unlock…

Recreation & Sports
3
National Collegiate Athletic Association

Provide a world-class athletics and academic experience for student-athletes that fosters lifelong well-being.

Recreation & Sports
4
Northwest Conference

Through its values, the northwest conference unites its member colleges and universities in the pacific northwest to empower student-athletes in their pursuit of academic and athletic excellence at the division iii level.

Recreation & Sports
5
National Intercollegiate Rodeo Association

Promote intercollegiate rodeo activities, maintain an operating code for intercollegiate competition, and coordinate intercollegiate rodeo on a national level.

—
6
Mid-American Athletic Conference Inc

Foster amateur intercollegiate sports competition between member institution teams under the rules and regulations of the ncaa.

—
7
United States Collegiate Ski and Snowboa Uscsa

To be the Nationally Governing Body of Team Ski and Snowboard Competition at the Collegiate Level and provide competition and development opportunities for student activities in a team atmosphere. Determining National Championships in each…

—
8
Northern Sun Intercollegiate Conference

The NSIC is a model Division II conference that uses high-level athletics competition to develop champions in the classroom and community while empowering student-athletes to be impactful and positive leaders.

Recreation & Sports
9
United States Bowling Congress Inc

Amateur Sports

Recreation & Sports
10
Southwestern Athletic Conference

The southwestern athletic conference, inc. is organized exclusively for the purpose of encouraging, promoting, advancing, and conducting intercollegiate sports activities and other recreational and not-for-profit activities among the…

—
11
Southern States Athletic Conference

Promote athletics for member colleges and universities by organizing schedules, promulgatin rules, tv promotion, and obtaining sponsorships

Recreation & Sports
12
Rocky Mountain Athletic Conference

The rocky mountain athletic conference empowers student-athletes to realize their full potential in athletics, academics and in life through a richly rewarding and nationally competitive experience at our unique ncaa division ii…

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pac-12 Conference; the most unlike its peers is Snore Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW YEAR'S EVE (GRUCCI FIREWORKS): $4,154,939 · OtherNEW YEAR'S EVE (GRUCCI FIREWORKS)FREMONT STREET EXPERIENCE: $2,632,143 · OtherFREMONT STREET EXPERIENCEWest Coast Conference: $1,500,000 · OtherWest Coast ConferenceEDGEWATER GAMING: $1,424,000 · OtherEDGEWATER GAMINGMESQUITE RESORT ASSOCIATION: $1,020,100 · OtherMESQUITE RESORT ASSOCIATIONNBA PROPERTIES INC (SUMMER LEAGUE): $850,000 · OtherNASCAR BANQUET: $800,000 · OtherCOMPETITOR GROUP INC: $750,000 · OtherLIFE IS BEAUTIFUL: $675,000 · Other+18 more: $2,908,754 · Other+18 moreUNITED STATES BOWLING CONGRESS INC: $2,444,578 · Recreation & SportsUNITED STATES BOWLING CONGRESS …MOUNTAIN WEST CONFERENCE: $2,231,837 · Recreation & SportsMOUNTAIN WEST CONFERENCEPAC-12 CONFERENCE: $2,000,000 · Recreation & SportsPAC-12 CONFERENCEINDIAN NATIONAL FINALS RODEO: $250,000 · Recreation & SportsLAUGHLIN TOURISM COMMISSION INC: $1,532,300 · Community ImprovementRE ARENA INC: $100,000 · Education
Other$16,714,936Recreation & Sports$6,926,415Community Improvement$1,532,300Education$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED STATES BOWLING CONGRESS INC: $2,444,578 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetMOUNTAIN WEST CONFERENCE: $2,231,837 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetPAC-12 CONFERENCE: $2,000,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLAUGHLIN TOURISM COMMISSION INC: $1,532,300 over 9y, 79% of budgetWest Coast Conference: $1,500,000 over 9y, 3.4% of budgetINDIAN NATIONAL FINALS RODEO: $250,000 over 8y, 3.3% of budgetSNORE LTD: $70,000 over 4y, 6.8% of budgetTHE NATIONAL BOWLING ASSOCIATION INC: $40,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED STATES BOWLING CONGRESS INC ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN WEST CONFERENCE ↗
  • Who funds PAC-12 CONFERENCE ↗
  • Who funds LAUGHLIN TOURISM COMMISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds West Coast Conference ↗
  • Who funds INDIAN NATIONAL FINALS RODEO ↗
  • Who funds USSSA OF SOUTHERN NEVADA ↗
  • Who funds SNORE LTD ↗
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL BOWLING ASSOCIATION INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Las Vegas Events Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Las Vegas Events Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Las Vegas Events’ filings →

    More from the funding graph