Skip to content
Lamar County Fire Fighters Association at a glance

· Public charity

Lamar County Fire Fighters Association

Oversees donations for 19 volunteer fire departments in lamar county

$267k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$43k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Public Safety & Disaster$876k
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 17 grants below total $256,783, the rows itemized in this filing. The $266,551 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $9,768 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $207k
$11,609
Median grant
1
States reached
$23k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BLOSSOM VFD$42,992
POWDERLY VFD$40,034
FAUGHT VFD$22,005
BROOKSTON VFD$19,794
RENO VFD$17,098
HOPEWELL VFD$16,410
LAMAR POINT VFD$14,722
TIGERTOWN VFD$12,665
CHICOTA VFD$11,609
MIDWAY VFD$10,021
ROXTON VFD$9,889
DIRECT VFD$8,510
BIARDSTOWN VFD$7,347
NOVICE VFD$6,414
DEPORT VFD$6,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BROOKSTON VFD: $20k → 15%BROOKSTON VFD: $19k → 15%BROOKSTON VFD: $16k → 15%BROOKSTON VFD: $15k → 15%ROXTON VFD: $10k → 15%ROXTON VFD: $10k → 15%ROXTON VFD: $8k → 15%ROXTON VFD: $8k → 15%FAUGHT VFD: $22k → 15%FAUGHT VFD: $22k → 15%FAUGHT VFD: $19k → 15%FAUGHT VFD: $19k → 15%RENO VFD: $17k → 15%RENO VFD: $17k → 15%RENO VFD: $15k → 15%RENO VFD: $15k → 15%MIDWAY VFD: $10k → 15%MIDWAY VFD: $10k → 15%MIDWAY VFD: $9k → 15%MIDWAY VFD: $9k → 15%BIARDSTOWN VFD: $7k → 15%BIARDSTOWN VFD: $7k → 15%NOVICE VFD: $7k → 15%BIARDSTOWN VFD: $6k → 15%BLOSSOM VFD: $43k → 15%BLOSSOM VFD: $13k → 15%BLOSSOM VFD: $12k → 15%BLOSSOM VFD: $12k → 15%HOPEWELL VFD: $16k → 15%HOPEWELL VFD: $16k → 15%HOPEWELL VFD: $15k → 15%HOPEWELL VFD: $14k → 15%TIGERTOWN VFD: $13k → 15%TIGERTOWN VFD: $13k → 15%TIGERTOWN VFD: $11k → 15%TIGERTOWN VFD: $11k → 15%DIRECT VFD: $9k → 15%DIRECT VFD: $9k → 15%DIRECT VFD: $8k → 15%DIRECT VFD: $8k → 15%POWDERLY VFD: $40k → 15%POWDERLY VFD: $40k → 15%POWDERLY VFD: $36k → 15%POWDERLY VFD: $35k → 15%LAMAR POINT VFD: $15k → 15%LAMAR POINT VFD: $15k → 15%LAMAR POINT VFD: $13k → 15%LAMAR POINT VFD: $13k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$876k · 17 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
0

Total granted

$876k
$0

Still filing today

24%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PV
    POWDERLY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT
    4× · 2022–2025 · $151k
  • FC
    FAUGHT COMMUNITY CENTER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT
    4× · 2022–2025 · $82k · revenue +49%
  • BV
    BLOSSOM VFD
    4× · 2022–2025 · $80k

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    2
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    4/4
    Grantees still filing
    2/4
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    POWDERLY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $150,602 · OtherPOWDERLY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENTBLOSSOM VFD: $79,984 · OtherBLOSSOM VFDBROOKSTON VFD: $70,201 · OtherBROOKSTON VFDRENO VOLUNTEER FIRE & RESCUE DEPARTMENT: $63,821 · OtherRENO VOLUNTEER FIRE & RESCUE DEPARTMENTHOPEWELL VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $61,486 · OtherHOPEWELL VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENTLAMAR POINT-EMBERSON-CAVINESS VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $54,921 · OtherLAMAR POINT-EMBERSON-CAVINESS VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENTTIGERTOWN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT: $48,010 · OtherTIGERTOWN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPTCHICOTA VFD: $45,829 · OtherCHICOTA VFDLAMAR COUNTY MIDWAY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $36,922 · OtherDIRECT VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $32,939 · OtherBIARDSTOWN COMMUNITY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $27,638 · Other+4 more: $85,620 · Other+4 moreFAUGHT COMMUNITY CENTER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $81,715 · Public Safety & DisasterFAUGHT COMMUNIT…ROXTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $36,177 · Public Safety & DisasterROXTON VOLUNTEE…
    Other$757,973Public Safety & Disaster$117,892

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$100kgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAUGHT COMMUNITY CENTER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $81,715 over 4y, 15% of budgetBROOKSTON VFD: $70,201 over 4y, 34% of budgetRENO VOLUNTEER FIRE & RESCUE DEPARTMENT: $63,821 over 4y, 39% of budgetROXTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $36,177 over 4y, 14% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds FAUGHT COMMUNITY CENTER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
    • Who funds BROOKSTON VFD ↗
    • Who funds RENO VOLUNTEER FIRE & RESCUE DEPARTMENT ↗
    • Who funds ROXTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Lamar County Fire Fighters Association funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lamar County Fire Fighters Association. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to Lamar County Fire Fighters Association?

      Find your warmest path to Lamar County Fire Fighters Association through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Lamar County Fire Fighters Association’s filings →

      More from the funding graph

      The unnamed billions
      grants reported with no recipient in the public record
      The regranting layer
      51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
      The DAF merry-go-round
      $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
      The endowment market
      who holds foundation money, and what just moved
      The camps
      funders cluster by geography, not ideology
      By state
      where grant money is based, and what stays home