Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lakshan Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$712k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Food & Nutrition$3.5MEducation$3.0MPhilanthropy$2.3MScience & Tech$2.1MReligion$600kArts & Culture$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $250k+5 grants · $2.9M
$600,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$39M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK$711,718
IIT MADRAS FOUNDATION$600,000
ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$600,000
EMORY UNIVERSITY$600,000
Individual grant recipient$400,000
INDIA AMERICA CULTURAL ASSOCIATION$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

Your US giving — 87% of grant dollars ($10M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 13% that went abroad ($1.5M) is mapped below.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $2.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%IIT MADRAS FOUNDATION: $600k → 8%IIT MADRAS FOUNDATION: $600k → 8%IIT MADRAS FOUNDATION: $450k → 8%IIT MADRAS FOUNDATION: $450k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Beyond the US — 13% of all-years giving ($1.5M)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Canada$1.5M · 3 grants

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 22% of Lakshan Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Lakshan Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 13% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$9.1M · 6 repeat orgs$650k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against -40% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
1

Total granted

$9.1M
$250k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
-40%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $400k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $3.3M · revenue +50%
  • IM
    IIT MADRAS FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2025 · $2.1M · revenue +149%
  • EU
    Emory University
    3× · 2023–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • OH
    OPEN HAND ATLANTA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue -40%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
05the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
4/6
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $3,300,000 · Food & NutritionATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INCOPEN HAND ATLANTA INC — $250,000 · Food & NutritionOPEN HAND ATLANTA INCUNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK — $1,503,521 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNS…THE HINDU TEMPLE OF ATLANTA INC — $600,000 · OtherTHE HINDU TEMPLE OF ATL…Individual grant recipient — $400,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipi…NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $2,299,945 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPI…IIT MADRAS FOUNDATION — $2,100,000 · Human ServicesIIT MADRAS FOUNDATI…Emory University — $1,500,000 · EducationEmory Universi…INDIA AMERICAN CULTURAL ASSOCIATION INC — $50,000 · Arts & Culture
Food & Nutrition$3,550,000Other$2,503,521Philanthropy$2,299,945Human Services$2,100,000Education$1,500,000Arts & Culture$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $3,300,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $2,299,945 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetIIT MADRAS FOUNDATION — $2,100,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetEmory University — $1,500,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN HAND ATLANTA INC — $250,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetINDIA AMERICAN CULTURAL ASSOCIATION INC — $50,000 over 5y, 4.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST
  • Who funds IIT MADRAS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Emory University
  • Who funds OPEN HAND ATLANTA INC
  • Who funds INDIA AMERICAN CULTURAL ASSOCIATION INC

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lakshan Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph