Skip to content
Lahey Clinic Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Lahey Clinic Inc

Lahey clinic, inc.

$485k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$162k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Health$178kHousing & Shelter$30kScience & Tech$26k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $172k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $308k
$35,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$351M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOSTON UNIVERSITY$161,583
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL$91,646
CITIZENS INN INC$55,000
CITY OF PEABODY$42,000
CENTERBOARD INC$35,000
HOUSING CORPORATION OF ARLINGTON$30,000
TRUSTEES OF TUFTS COLLEGETUFTS UNIV$21,000
FRIENDS OF ASAPROSAR INC$18,088
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$15,000
HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTHCARE INC$11,091
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $15k → 7%HOUSING CORPORATION OF ARLINGTON: $30k → 8%CENTERBOARD INC: $35k → 10%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $162k → 16%INDIANA UNIVERSITY: $26k → 18%FRIENDS OF ASAPROSAR INC: $18k → 5%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $15k → 7%HOUSING CORPORATION OF ARLINGTON: $30k → 8%CITIZENS INN INC: $55k → 10%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $30k → 16%TRUSTEES OF TUFTS COLLEGETUFTS UNIV: $21k → 8%CITY OF PEABODY: $42k → 10%HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTHCARE INC: $11k → 16%TRUSTEES OF TUFTS COLLEGETUFTS UNIV: $21k → 8%PEABODY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $36k → 10%HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTHCARE INC: $7k → 16%NEWHALL FIELDS COMMUNITY FARM: $15k → 10%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $92k → 16%SUTTON RESIDENCE FOR WOMEN: $10k → 10%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL PHYSICIANS ORG INC: $18k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$342k · 5 repeat orgs$373k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +8% since the first grant, against -15% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
6

Total granted

$342k
$131k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
-15%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $242k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
HealthHousing & ShelterEducationFood & NutritionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $192k · revenue +8%
  • Trustees of Tufts College
    2× · 2024–2025 · $42k · revenue +12%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $30k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • PE
    PEABODY EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $36k · revenue -23%
  • IU
    Indiana University School of Medicine
    one grant, 2023 · $26k
  • AH
    ATRIUM HEALTH INC
    one grant, 2023 · $26k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
2
Associated Physicians of Harvard Medical Faculty Physicians At Bidmc Inc

The mission of associated physicians of harvard medical faculty physicians at beth israel deaconess medical center, inc. d/b/a longwood specialty physicians (lsp) is to provide world class clinical care and medical instruction and to…

Health
3
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
4
Rhode Island Hospital

As a founding hospital in the brown university health system, rih is committed to its mission: delivering health with care.

Health
5
Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary

THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY ("THE INFIRMARY") IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TEACHING HOSPITAL CONDUCTING PATIENT CARE AND RESEARCH. THE INFIRMARY IS A TEACHING HOSPITAL OF HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL AND AN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH.…

Health
6
Health Quality Partners

To improve the quality & experience of healthcare for patients, their families & healthcare providers through applied research and design of new systems of advanced preventive care that improve population health outcomes, enhance patient &…

Health
7
Mass General Brigham Incorporated

Patient care, teaching, research and serving the community.

Health
8
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
9
Mount Auburn Hospital

The mission of mount auburn hospital (mah or hospital) is to improve the health of the residents of cambridge, massachusetts and the surrounding communities in collaboration with its affiliates in the beth israel lahey health network. the…

Health
10
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc

Tertiary care academic medical center

Health
11
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
12
Putnam Hospital Center

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centerboard Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Sutton Residence for Women in Peabody. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
4/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $191,925 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITYMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $91,646 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDCITY OF PEABODY: $42,000 · OtherCITY OF PEABODYCENTERBOARD INC: $35,000 · OtherCENTERBOARD INCIndiana University School of Medicine: $26,000 · OtherIndiana University School of MedicineMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $17,895 · Other+1 more: $10,000 · OtherHOUSING CORPORATION OF ARLINGTON: $60,000 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING CORPORATIO…CITIZENS INN INC: $55,000 · Housing & ShelterCITIZENS INN INCTrustees of Tufts College: $42,000 · EducationTrustees of …PEABODY EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $35,951 · EducationPEABODY EDUC…American Heart Association Inc: $30,000 · HealthAmerican He…ATRIUM HEALTH INC: $26,000 · HealthATRIUM HEAL…HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE INC: $17,759 · HealthHARVARD PIL…FRIENDS OF ASAPROSAR: $18,088 · InternationalNEWHALL FIELDS COMMUNITY FARM INC: $15,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$414,466Housing & Shelter$115,000Education$77,951Health$73,759International$18,088Food & Nutrition$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $191,925 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSING CORPORATION OF ARLINGTON: $60,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCITIZENS INN INC: $55,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $42,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPEABODY EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $35,951 over 1y, 24% of budgetCENTERBOARD INC: $35,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE INC: $17,759 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEWHALL FIELDS COMMUNITY FARM INC: $15,000 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetTHE SUTTON RESIDENCE FOR WOMEN IN PEABODY: $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lahey Clinic Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lahey Clinic Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Inc: 37% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lahey Clinic’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home