Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ladish Co Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
40
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$567k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$7.1MCommunity Improvement$2.4MEducation$2.2MHousing & Shelter$1.5MAnimals$1.5MHuman Services$815kFood & Nutrition$360kArts & Culture$290kOther$0
02FY2025 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $435k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $908k
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.5M
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$9.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF MILWAUKEE$567,000
ROGERS BEHAVIORAL HEALTH$400,000
GUADALUPE CENTER$300,000
CATHEDRAL CENTER$250,000
CRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL$200,000
ST JOAN ANTIDA HIGH SCHOOL$200,000
HUMANE ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY$126,000
MILWAUKEE RESCUE MISSION$125,000
JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH$107,375
MAKE-A-WISH WISCONSIN$50,000
UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE$50,000
PATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE$50,000
CUDAHY HIGH SCHOOL$45,000
MANATEE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$40,000
HUNGER TASK FORCE OF MILWAUKEE$35,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $805k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 19% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GUADALUPE CENTER: $300k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $200k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $150k → 10%SECURE FUTURES FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 17%SECURE FUTURES FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 17%SECURE FUTURES FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 17%PATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE: $50k → 17%PATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE: $25k → 17%PATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE: $25k → 17%PATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE: $25k → 17%PATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE: $5k → 17%PATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE: $5k → 17%PATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14M · 49 repeat orgs$3.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

49 repeat relationships: 40 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
18

Total granted

$14M
$3.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+17%

Still filing today

49%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CATHEDRAL CENTER INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $765k · revenue +26%
  • GC
    Guadalupe Center Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $650k · revenue +10%
  • MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING
    3× · 2020–2023 · $415k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • LC
    LADISH CO FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $2.4M
  • MILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
    one grant, 2020 · $166k · revenue -43%
  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1D
    one grant, 2024 · $82k · revenue +17%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
2
Disability Rights Wisconsin Inc

Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.

—
3
Wisconsin Council of the Blind and Visua

The wisconsin council of the blind and visually impaired's mission is to promote the dignity and empowerment of people in wisconsin who are blind and visually impaired by providing services, advocating legislation, and educating the…

Health
4
Center for Healthcare Careers of Southeast Wisconsin Inc

The mission of the center for healthcare careers of southeast wisconsin, inc. (chcsew) is to unite all appropriate stakeholders in a viable, flexible structure to locate, educate and support a workforce from service to professional levels…

Health
5
Milwaukee County War Memorial Inc

The war memorial center's mission is to honor the dead and serve the living. we commemorate the courageous men and women who made the ultimate sacrifice in defense of freedom while preserving and sharing the stories, experiences, and…

Arts & Culture
6
Milwaukee Bar Association Inc

The mission of the milwaukee bar association is to be an inclusive, equitable and diverse organization that serves the interests of the lawyers, judges and the people of milwaukee county by working to promote the professional interests of…

—
7
Radio Milwaukee Inc

To reach a new generation of radio listeners on air, online and in the community with a compelling selection of music and public affairs programming. the corporation celebrates milwaukee music, arts, heritage, and culture by supporting and…

Arts & Culture
8
Employ Milwaukee Inc

The mission of employ milwaukee, inc. is to build a strong workforce development system by planning, coordinating, collaborating and monitoring workforce initiatives with businesses, partners and community stakeholders at the local,…

Employment
9
Milwaukee Women Inc

Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

Education
10
Wisconsin Medical Society Inc

To improve the health of the people of wisconsin by supporting and strengthening physicians' ability to practice high quality patient care in a changing environment.

—
11
Goodwill Industries of South Central Wisconsin Inc

Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…

Employment
12
My Choice Wisconsin Inc

We inspire people to experience life at its fullest by encouraging ownership of health, fostering independence, and serving the whole person; and do so with an unwavering commitment as stewards of medicaid funding.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Wisconsin Inc; the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
21/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LADISH CO FOUNDATION: $2,423,000 · OtherLADISH CO FOUNDATIONROGERS BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $2,300,000 · OtherROGERS BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $2,000,000 · OtherCHILDRENS HOSPITALZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF MILWAUKEE: $1,149,100 · OtherZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF MILWAUKEEMILWAUKEE RESCUE MISSION: $648,000 · OtherCRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL: $600,000 · OtherJUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FDN: $560,000 · Other+41 more: $2,905,375 · Other+41 moreCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AND HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $1,020,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S …MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN INC: $225,000 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH…Kathy's House Inc: $150,000 · HealthKathy's Hou…FISHER HOUSE WISCONSIN INC: $125,000 · HealthFISHER HOUS…VISION FORWARD ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED: $100,000 · HealthVISION FORW…BREAKTHROUGH T1D: $82,375 · HealthCENTER FOR DEAF-BLIND PERSONS INC: $75,000 · Health+1 more: $5,000 · HealthGuadalupe Center Inc: $650,000 · Human ServicesPATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE INC: $140,000 · Human Services+1 more: $15,000 · Human ServicesCATHEDRAL CENTER INC: $765,000 · ReligionMILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING: $415,000 · EducationMILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $166,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureUNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC: $24,000 · Arts & CultureHUMANE ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC: $226,000 · AnimalsZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF MILWAUKEE CTY: $40,000 · Animals
Other$12,585,475Health$1,782,375Human Services$805,000Religion$765,000Education$415,000Arts & Culture$290,000Animals$266,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AND HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $1,020,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCATHEDRAL CENTER INC: $765,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetGuadalupe Center Inc: $650,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetMILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING: $415,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHUMANE ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC: $226,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN INC: $225,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetHUNGER TASK FORCE INC: $175,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $166,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPrevent Blindness Wisconsin: $150,000 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetKathy's House Inc: $150,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC: $150,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE INC: $140,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC: $135,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFISHER HOUSE WISCONSIN INC: $125,000 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetVISION FORWARD ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED: $100,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $82,375 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR DEAF-BLIND PERSONS INC: $75,000 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe Guest House of Milwaukee Inc: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSOJOURNER FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF MILWAUKEE CTY: $40,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWISCONSIN BADGER CAMP INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetUNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC: $24,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP ODAYIN: $20,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetASCENSION WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSECUREFUTURES FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSt Bakhita Catholic Worker Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetAUDIO & BRAILLE LITERACY ENHANCEMENT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AND HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHEDRAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Guadalupe Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds HUNGER TASK FORCE INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds Prevent Blindness Wisconsin ↗
  • Who funds Kathy's House Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds PATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE INC ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds VISION FORWARD ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR DEAF-BLIND PERSONS INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds The Guest House of Milwaukee Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOJOURNER FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Milwaukee Foundation IncWI33.3× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Ralph Evinrude Foundation Inc · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Archdiocese of Milwaukee Catholic Community Foundation Inc · Joseph and Vera Zilber Family Foundation Inc · Otto Bremer Trust · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Usinger Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ladish Co Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ladish Co Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Guadalupe Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ladish Co Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Ladish Co Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ladish’s filings →

More from the funding graph