Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Laborers New Jersey Heavy and General Construction Laborers District Council

The district council is affiliated with the laborers' international union of north america and chartered by it.

$619k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$375k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Employment$1.6MCommunity Improvement$10kPublic Benefit$10kHealth$8kYouth Development$8kOther$125k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $210k
  • $250k+1 grant · $375k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$251k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEROF$375,000
LABORERS EASTERN REGION PEF$210,000
PATHWAYS TO APPRENTICESHIP NJ$10,000
NY HELMETS TO HARDHATS INC$10,000
CYOYOUTH & YOUNG ADULT MIN$5,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 8% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LIUNA AFRICAN AMERICAN CAUCUS: $10k → 22%OUTREACH PROJECT INC: $8k → 13%SPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW YORKINC: $8k → 14%NY HELMETS TO HARDHATS INC: $10k → 17%TJO LIUNA CHARITABLE FOUNDATI: $15k → 14%PATRIOTS PATH COUNCIL INC: $8k → 4%LEROF: $375k → 8%CYOYOUTH & YOUNG ADULT MIN: $6k → 14%PATHWAYS TO APPRENTICESHIP NJ: $10k → 16%TJO LIUNA CHARITABLE FOUNDATI: $15k → 14%LABORERS EASTERN REGION PEF: $210k → 8%CYOYOUTH & YOUNG ADULT MIN: $6k → 14%TJO LIUNA CHARITABLE FOUNDATI: $15k → 14%LABORERS EASTERN REGION PEF: $210k → 8%CYOYOUTH & YOUNG ADULT MIN: $6k → 14%LABORERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATIO: $15k → 14%LABORERS EASTERN REGION PEF: $120k → 8%CYOYOUTH & YOUNG ADULT MIN: $6k → 14%TJO LIUNA CHARITABLE FOUNDATI: $15k → 14%LABORERS EASTERN REGION PEF: $120k → 8%LABORERS EASTERN REGION PEF: $120k → 8%LABORERS EASTERN REGION PEF: $120k → 8%LABORERS EAST REG PEF: $120k → 8%LABORERS EASTERN REGION PEF: $120k → 8%LABORERS EAST REG PEF: $120k → 8%LABORERS EASTERN REGION CONV: $20k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 3 repeat orgs$448k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
5

Total granted

$1.4M
$53k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+13%

Still filing today

67%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $395k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EmploymentCommunity ImprovementPublic BenefitHealthYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LE
    LABORERS EASTERN REGION POLITICAL EDUCATION FUND
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +45% · 42% of their budget
  • TJ
    TERENCE J O'SULLIVAN LIUNA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    5× · 2018–2024 · $75k · revenue -5%
  • AO
    ARCHDIOCESE OF NEWARK
    4× · 2022–2025 · $22k

Funded once

  • LE
    LABORERS EASTERN REGION CONV
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
  • AA
    AFRICAN AMERICAN CAUCUS
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -69%
  • OP
    OUTREACH PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue +14%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Laborers' International Union of North America Laborers' Local #43

Promote and protect the interests of the members of the local

2
Eastern Atlantic States Regional Council of Carpenters

Labor union maintaining and improving the benefit and working conditions of members engaged in the carpentry trade.

3
Laborers International Union of North America - Local 1076

The local is a nonprofit organization established to represent its members in wage and fringe benefits matters in the construction industry. the local's primary areas of jurisdiction are oakland and livingston counties.

4
Laborers International Union of North America Local #165

Operation of local union.

5
Laborers' International Union of North America

To improve working conditions and living standards of members through collective bargaining, education, training, and employee benefits.

6
Construction and Public Employees Liuna Local #177

Operation of laborers local union for the benefit of its members.

7
Laborers International Union of North America Local 152

Labor union

8
Laborers International Union of North America Local 872

To provide continuous employment, collectively bargain for improvement of working conditions and wages.

9
Laborer's International Union of North a

A fraternal labor organization whose purpose is to promote employment of members in a safe work environment and ensurefair labor practices.

10
Laborers International Union of North America Local 225

Organize workers for advancement

Employment
11
Laborers International Union of North America

The association was established to represent employees covered by collective bargaining agreements between the union and various employers in the catholic educational institutions in the new york city and long island geographic areas.

12
Laborers Intl Union of North America Local 327 Local Union

Membership organization representing approximately 300 union members for the purpose of collective bargaining.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Laborers Eastern Region Organizing Fund and the most unlike its peers is Special Olympics New York Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LABORERS EASTERN REGION POLITICAL EDUCATION FUND — $1,260,000 · EmploymentLABORERS EASTERN REGION POLITICAL EDUCATION FUNDLABORERS EASTERN REGION ORGANIZING FUND — $375,000 · EmploymentLABORERS EASTERN REGION ORGANIZING FUND+1 more — $10,000 · EmploymentTERENCE J O'SULLIVAN LIUNA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $75,000 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF NEWARK — $22,000 · OtherLABORERS EASTERN REGION CONV — $20,000 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW YORK INC — $7,500 · OtherPATHWAYS TO APPRENTICESHIP NEW JERSEY — $10,000 · Community ImprovementNY HELMETS TO HARDHATS INC — $10,000 · Public BenefitOUTREACH PROJECT INC — $8,000 · HealthPATRIOTS' PATH COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $7,500 · Youth Development
Employment$1,645,000Other$124,500Community Improvement$10,000Public Benefit$10,000Health$8,000Youth Development$7,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLABORERS EASTERN REGION POLITICAL EDUCATION FUND — $1,260,000 over 9y, 42% of budgetLABORERS EASTERN REGION ORGANIZING FUND — $375,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetTERENCE J O'SULLIVAN LIUNA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetAFRICAN AMERICAN CAUCUS — $10,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetOUTREACH PROJECT INC — $8,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW YORK INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPATRIOTS' PATH COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Laborers New Jersey Heavy and General Construction Laborers District Council funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph