Skip to content
Laborers International Union of N America Local 368 at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Laborers International Union of N America Local 368

To be a leader among unions in the construction industry in hawaii providing employment opportunities and advancement for all our members through profitable construction projects by our signatory contractors.

$69k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Philanthropy$202kEmployment$48kHuman Services$15kFood & Nutrition$10kEducation$5kYouth Development$5k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $17,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $69,290 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $52,290 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$11,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$24M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HELP$11,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WOMEN IN CONSTRUCTION$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%YMCA OF HONOLULU - KALIHI BRANCH: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Laborers International Union of North America

Representing members in matters of collective bargaining.

—
2
Laborers' International Union of North America Local No 5

Labor union

—
3
Laborers International Union of North America Local 225

Organize workers for advancement

Employment
4
Laborers International Union of North America - Local 1076

The local is a nonprofit organization established to represent its members in wage and fringe benefits matters in the construction industry. the local's primary areas of jurisdiction are oakland and livingston counties.

—
5
Laborers International Union of Na

Improvements to conditions of workers

—
6
Laborers International Union of Na Sewer and Tunnel Miners Union Local 2

Secure fair compensation and working conditions for all members.

—
7
Laborers International Union of North America Local 152

Labor union

—
8
Laborers International Union of North America Local Union No 242

Serving the greater seattle area, the union is committed to working on behalf of their members with the main goal of making the quality of life better for them and their families.

—
9
Unite Here Local 5

Organized hotel and restaurant industry workers throughout the organization's jurisdiction, established and maintained equitable wage scales and working conditions, represented union members through negotiations and collective bargaining,…

—
10
Laborers International Union of North America Local No 261

The local union engages in collective bargaining, grievance representation and benefits administration on behalf of its membership.

—
11
Hawaii Workers Center

The hawaii workers center envisions a hawaii in which all workers are empowered to exercise their right to organize for their social, economic and political well-being.

Education
12
Laborer's International Union of North a

A fraternal labor organization whose purpose is to promote employment of members in a safe work environment and ensurefair labor practices.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hawaii Meals On Wheels Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sac Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAC Foundation: $180,000 · OtherSAC FoundationLABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF N AMERICA LOCAL 368: $41,500 · OtherLABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF N AMERICA LOCAL 368H E L P USA INC: $11,000 · Other+5 more: $26,500 · Other+5 moreYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF HONOLULU: $10,000 · Human ServicesHAWAII MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionSURFRIDER SPIRIT SESSIONS: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$259,000Human Services$10,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Arts & Culture$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAC Foundation: $180,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetLABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF N AMERICA LOCAL 368: $41,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF HONOLULU: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WOMEN IN CONSTRUCTION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTERENCE J O'SULLIVAN LIUNA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSURFRIDER SPIRIT SESSIONS: $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetIRON WORKERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Central Pacific Bank …
Central Pacific Bank FoundationHI13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Central Pacific Bank Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Laborers International Union of N America Local 368 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Laborers International Union of N America Local 368. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Laborers International Union of N America Local 368?

    Find your warmest path to Laborers International Union of N America Local 368 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Laborers International Union of N America Local 368’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home