· Public charity
Laborers' Health and Safety Fund of North America
Trust agreement page 5 2.02.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 4 grants below total $45,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $91,853 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $46,853 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TERENCE J O'SULLIVAN LIUNA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY ALLIANCE FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION | $10,000 |
| ARMAND E SABITONI CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| JOHNS HOPKINS MEDICINE | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY9× · 2017–2025 · $240k · revenue +64%- TNTHE NEW ENGLAND LABORERS APPRENTICESHIP ADVANCEMENT FUND4× · 2017–2020 · $45k · revenue +46%
- AEARMAND E SABITONI CHARITABLE FOUNDATION2× · 2023–2025 · $35k · revenue +23%
Funded once
- WIWASHINGTON IRELAND PROGRAM FOR SERVICE & LEADERSHIPone grant, 2022 · $23k · revenue +24%
- AIAMERICAN IRISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY INCone grant, 2018 · $13k · revenue +6%
MARCH OF DIMES INCone grant, 2020 · $13k · revenue -17%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Improvement of Workers Conditions, wages and benefits
To promote and maintain the interests of its members
Wilmington university is committed to excellence in teaching, relevancy of the curriculum, and individual attention to students. as an institution with admissions policies that provide access for all, it offers opportunity for higher…
The association was established to represent employees covered by collective bargaining agreements between the union and various employers in the catholic educational institutions in the new york city and long island geographic areas.
Ciic provides service to the irish/irish american community across the us in partnership with its direct service member centers, thus impacting constituents. ciic provides a national perspective of issues facing irish immigrants, while…
Represents its members when dealing with the state of Delaware and other employment related matters.
To support education
Membership organization representing approximately 8,700 union members for the purpose of collective bargaining.
To improve working conditions and living standards of members through collective bargaining, education, training, and employee benefits.
The union provides for the continuous employment of labor to bring about stable conditions & establish necessary procedures for amicable adjustment of all disputes which may arise between employers and employees.
Improvements to conditions of workers
Union hall devoted to the betterment of members compensation and working conditions, to secure recognition of workers rights to engage in collective bargaining, and to promote the development and maintenance of on-the-job safety practices…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Washington Ireland Program for Service & Leadership and the most unlike its peers is Dc Friends of Ireland Charitable Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds TERENCE J O'SULLIVAN LIUNA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE NEW ENGLAND LABORERS APPRENTICESHIP ADVANCEMENT FUND ↗
- Who funds ARMAND E SABITONI CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON IRELAND PROGRAM FOR SERVICE & LEADERSHIP ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN IRISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
- Who funds DC FRIENDS OF IRELAND CHARITABLE TRUST ↗
- Who funds GREATER PROVIDENCE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION & ALUMNI ENGAGEMENT ↗
- Who funds CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY ALLIANCE FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Laborers Employers Cooperation and Education Trust · Great Lakes Region Organizing Committee
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Laborers' Health and Safety Fund of North America funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.