Skip to content

California · Public charity

Labor Management Cooperation Committee

The mission of this organizaton is to promote improved labor management relations in the electrical industry.

$51k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
4
Itemized grants FY2025
2
Organizations funded FY2024
50%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$38k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$10,415
Largest grant, FY2025
$16,207
Organizations funded a year
2 to 3
FY2022 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$288k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 50% of the organizations Labor Management Cooperation Committee funded were first-time grantees, receiving 60% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
Public Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving4$38k75%
FY20242$25k50%
FY20233$55k100%
FY20222$60kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Membership Benefit$50kPublic Safety & Disaster$40kHuman Services$40kRecreation & Sports$38kHousing & Shelter$10k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2022 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Ibew 551 Benevolent Fund Inc$50,000163%
Community Support Network$40,00030%
Redwood Empire Chapter NECA$25,00014%
Petaluma Leghorns Baseball Club Inc$16,2071n/a
Occidental Volunteer Fire Departmentinc$15,000118%
Petaluma City Schools$10,4151n/a
Individual & Family Support Network$10,00010%
Petaluma Leghorns Baseball Inc$10,0001n/a
Indian Valley Junior Golf Foundation$1,5001n/a

Compare Labor Management Cooperation Committee with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Labor Management Cooperation Committee?

Find your warmest path to Labor Management Cooperation Committee through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Labor Management Cooperation Committee

How much does Labor Management Cooperation Committee give?
Labor Management Cooperation Committee reported 4 itemized grants totaling $38,122, out of $51,122 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 3 organizations a year over FY2022 to FY2024.
What does Labor Management Cooperation Committee fund?
By grant dollars over FY2022 to FY2025, its largest causes are Membership Benefit (28%), Public Safety & Disaster (22%), Human Services (22%).
Who are Labor Management Cooperation Committee's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2022 to FY2025: Ibew 551 Benevolent Fund Inc ($50k), Community Support Network ($40k), Redwood Empire Chapter NECA ($25k).
Does Labor Management Cooperation Committee fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 50% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is Labor Management Cooperation Committee based?
Labor Management Cooperation Committee is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Labor Management Cooperation Committee’s filings →

More from the funding graph