Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

La Jolla Golden Triangle Rotary Club Foundation

To assist people in need

$241k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$69k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 60% of LA JOLLA GOLDEN TRIANGLE ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 4 grants below total $123,031 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $240,734 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $117,703 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $54k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $69k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$172k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LA JOLLA GOLDEN TRIANGLE RC$69,040
SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION$25,000
THE ROTARY FOUNDATION$17,991
QUENCH AND CONNECT$11,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%San Diego Police Northern Div: $31k → 11%Christina Welch Scholarships: $17k → 18%Rotary Intl Foundation: $142k → 14%SAN DIEGO POLICE NORTHERN DIV: $6k → 11%Rotary Intl Foundation: $113k → 14%Miramar Project co RickClark: $11k → 11%Rotary Intl Foundation: $49k → 14%SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $25k → 11%Rotary Intl Foundation: $19k → 14%Pendleton Proj co RickClark: $10k → 11%THE ROTARY FOUNDATION: $18k → 14%San Diego Foundation: $21k → 11%THE ROTARY FOUNDATION: $11k → 14%Pendleton Proj co Rick Clark: $8k → 11%San Diego Foundation: $9k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Grants abroad, by region — $109k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 4 regions, $108k to organizations and $1k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

East Asia and the Pacific$74k · 68% · 2 grants · 1 person

Stated purpose: AFGHAN PROJECTS · AFGHAN YOUTH CONNEC · SCHOLARSHIP

Baja California$34k · 31% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: MEXICO PROJECTS

Sub-Saharan Africa$1k · 1% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: HEART SURGERIES

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$585 · 1% · 1 person

Stated purpose: SCHOLARSHIP

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$437k · 3 repeat orgs$193k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
10

Total granted

$437k
$182k

Still filing today

33%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RI
    ROTARY INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT 5340
    9× · 2017–2025 · $382k · revenue -5%
  • SD
    San Diego Police Northern Div
    2× · 2022–2023 · $38k
  • PP
    Pendleton Proj co RickClark
    2× · 2018–2020 · $18k

Funded once

  • LJ
    La Jolla Golden Triangle RC
    one grant, 2020 · $36k
  • MR
    Mayaguez Rotary Club
    one grant, 2018 · $30k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $28k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
2/4
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ROTARY INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT 5340 — $381,591 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT 5340San Diego Police Northern Div — $37,744 · OtherSan Diego Police Northern DivLa Jolla Golden Triangle RC — $35,500 · OtherLa Jolla Golden Triangle RCMayaguez Rotary Club — $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $27,989 · Other+8 more — $106,063 · Other+8 moreTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $353,236 · InternationalTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNA…+1 more — $11,000 · InternationalTHE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $54,943 · Philanthropy
Other$618,887International$364,236Philanthropy$54,943

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT 5340 — $381,591 over 9y, 17% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $353,236 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $54,943 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetQUENCH AND CONNECT — $11,000 over 1y, 10% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ROTARY INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT 5340
  • Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds THE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION
  • Who funds QUENCH AND CONNECT

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization La Jolla Golden Triangle Rotary Club Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to La Jolla Golden Triangle Rotary Club Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to La Jolla Golden Triangle Rotary Club Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph