Skip to content
L A Pires Endowment Corp at a glance

· Public charity

L A Pires Endowment Corp

Pooled Investment Trust for 501(C)'s with required annual donations made to the required 501(C)'s as set forth in the organizational documents.

$405k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$180k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Membership Benefit$872kReligion$871kHealth$254kCommunity Improvement$171kCivil Rights$120k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $225k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $180k
$45,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Dallas Scottish Rite$180,000
Dallas Masonic Lodge 760$45,000
Hella Shrine AAOMS$45,000
Dallas Chapter No 47 RAM$45,000
Dallas Council No 18 R & SM$45,000
Dallas Commandery No 6$45,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Dallas Council #18 R & SM: $50k → 14%Dallas KT #16: $50k → 14%Dallas Chapter No 47 RAM: $50k → 14%Dallas Council No 18 R & SM: $45k → 14%Dallas Chapter No 47 RAM: $45k → 14%Dallas Commandery No 6: $45k → 14%Dallas Commandery No 6: $28k → 14%Dallas Council No 18 R & SM: $28k → 14%Dallas Chapter No 47 RAM: $28k → 14%Dallas Commandery No 6: $25k → 14%Dallas Council No 18 R & SM: $25k → 14%Dallas KT #16: $25k → 14%Dallas Chapter No 47 RAM: $25k → 14%Dallas Council #18 R & SM: $25k → 14%Dallas Chapter No 47 RAM: $25k → 14%Dallas Chapter No 47 RAM: $23k → 14%Dallas Commandery No 6: $23k → 14%Dallas Chapter No 47 RAM: $23k → 14%Dallas Council #18 R & SM: $23k → 14%Dallas Council No 18 R & SM: $23k → 14%Dallas KT #6: $23k → 14%Dallas Masonic Lodge 760: $50k → 14%Dallas Masonic Lodge 760: $45k → 14%Dallas Masonic Lodge 760: $28k → 14%Dallas Masonic Lodge 760: $25k → 14%Dallas Masonic Lodge 760: $25k → 14%Dallas Masonic Lodge 760: $23k → 14%DALLAS MONSONIC LODGE 760: $23k → 14%Dallas Masonic Lodge 760: $23k → 14%DALLAS KT #6: $23k → 14%Hella Shrine AAOMS: $50k → 14%Hella Shrine AAOMS: $45k → 14%Hella Shrine AAOMS: $28k → 14%Hella Shrine AAOMS: $25k → 14%Hella Shrine AAOMS: $25k → 14%Hella Shrine AAOMS: $23k → 14%Hella Shrine AAOMS: $23k → 14%HELLA SHRINE AAOMS: $23k → 14%Dallas Scottish Rite: $200k → 14%Dallas Scottish Rite: $180k → 14%Dallas Scottish Rite: $111k → 14%Dallas Scottish Rite: $100k → 14%Dallas Scottish Rite: $100k → 14%DALLAS SCOTTISH RITE: $90k → 14%Dallas Scottish Rite: $90k → 14%Dallas Scottish Rite: $90k → 14%DALLAS SCOTTISH RITE: $56k → 14%DALLAS COUNCIL #18 R & SM: $23k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 6 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
0

Total granted

$2.3M
$0

Still filing today

83%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    ANCIENT & ACCEPTED SCOTTISH RITE VALLEY OF THE DALLAS & COORD BODIES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +28% · 32% of their budget
  • AF
    Ancient Free & Accepted Masons of Dallas Lodge 760
    9× · 2017–2025 · $254k · revenue +140% · 42% of their budget
  • DC
    Dallas Chapter 47 Royal Arch Masons of Texas
    9× · 2017–2025 · $254k · 61% of their budget

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    5
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    5/6
    Grantees still filing
    2/6
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    ANCIENT & ACCEPTED SCOTTISH RITE VALLEY OF THE DALLAS & COORD BODIES: $1,017,200 · OtherANCIENT & ACCEPTED SCOTTISH RITE VALLEY OF THE DALLAS & COORD BODIESAncient Free & Accepted Masons of Dallas Lodge 760: $254,300 · OtherAncient Free & Accepted Masons of Dallas Lodge 760Dallas Chapter 47 Royal Arch Masons of Texas: $254,300 · OtherDallas Chapter 47 Royal Arch Masons of TexasKNIGHTS TEMPLAR OF THE US NO 6: $254,300 · OtherKNIGHTS TEMPLAR OF THE US NO 6Royal & Select Masters of Texas Dallas Council No 18: $254,300 · OtherRoyal & Select Masters of Texas Dallas Council No 18SHRINERS INTERNATIONAL HELLA SHRINERS: $254,300 · OtherSHRINERS INTERNATIONAL HELLA SHRINERS
    Other$2,288,700

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$100kgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANCIENT & ACCEPTED SCOTTISH RITE VALLEY OF THE DALLAS & COORD BODIES: $1,017,200 over 9y, 32% of budgetAncient Free & Accepted Masons of Dallas Lodge 760: $254,300 over 9y, 42% of budgetDallas Chapter 47 Royal Arch Masons of Texas: $254,300 over 9y, 61% of budgetKNIGHTS TEMPLAR OF THE US NO 6: $254,300 over 9y, 73% of budgetRoyal & Select Masters of Texas Dallas Council No 18: $254,300 over 9y, 61% of budgetSHRINERS INTERNATIONAL HELLA SHRINERS: $254,300 over 9y, 8.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds ANCIENT & ACCEPTED SCOTTISH RITE VALLEY OF THE DALLAS & COORD BODIES ↗
    • Who funds Ancient Free & Accepted Masons of Dallas Lodge 760 ↗
    • Who funds Dallas Chapter 47 Royal Arch Masons of Texas ↗
    • Who funds KNIGHTS TEMPLAR OF THE US NO 6 ↗
    • Who funds Royal & Select Masters of Texas Dallas Council No 18 ↗
    • Who funds SHRINERS INTERNATIONAL HELLA SHRINERS ↗

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization L A Pires Endowment Corp funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from L A Pires Endowment Corp. Bigger dots raise more.

    2025
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to L A Pires Endowment Corp?

      Find your warmest path to L A Pires Endowment Corp through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on L A Pires Endowment’s filings →

      More from the funding graph

      The unnamed billions
      grants reported with no recipient in the public record
      The regranting layer
      51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
      The DAF merry-go-round
      $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
      The endowment market
      who holds foundation money, and what just moved
      The camps
      funders cluster by geography, not ideology
      By state
      where grant money is based, and what stays home