Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Kws Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$270k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$160k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$1.3MHealth$770kHuman Services$387kEducation$205kPhilanthropy$145kRecreation & Sports$68kYouth Development$20kArts & Culture$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $260k
$100,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST LUKES UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$160,000
ST LUKES UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$100,000
SAN ANGELO STOCK SHOW$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $125k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY SERVICES CENTER: $125k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.4M · 5 repeat orgs$387k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
12

Total granted

$2.4M
$377k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-10%
+20%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyEducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    ST LUKES UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.3M
  • MA
    MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER
    2× · 2018–2019 · $525k
  • CC
    Christian Community Service Center Inc
    5× · 2019–2024 · $387k · revenue -10%

Funded once

  • TT
    TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $170k · revenue +20%
  • TB
    TEXAS BASEBALL HALL OF FAME
    one grant, 2017 · $43k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF ODESSA INC
    one grant, 2017 · $35k · revenue -20%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Harris County Medical Society

Our mission is to be the leading advocate for our member physicians, their patients and our community, in promoting the highest standards of ethical medical practice, access to quality medical care, medical education, research, and…

2
Houston Independent School District Foundation

The HISD Foundation is dedicated to mobilizing the local community to support innovative priorities in HISD to improve outcomes for all students in the district. Our mission is to fund projects and programs of merit that fall outside of…

3
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
4
Trees for Houston

Plant, protect and promote trees all over the greater Houston area.

5
Houston Christian Foundation dba National Christian Foundation Houston

As the Houston affiliate of the National Christian Foundation (NCF), our mission is to serve and encourage givers to grow as faithful stewards who give wisely to further the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

6
Texas Children's Hospital Foundation

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and research.

Health
7
University of Houston Foundation

University of Houston Foundation provides program support to University of Houston System for various scholarship and educational programs.

Education
8
Houston Tscpa Foundation

Develop, promote, and present programs of continuing education and professional development interest to cpas in the houston area. the foundation also has fundraising programs for endowments and chartiable causes

Community Improvement
9
Texas a&M Foundation

The texas a&m foundation builds a brighter future for texas a&m university, one relationship at a time, by uniting generosity and vision to raise support and manage endowed gifts.

Education
10
Houston Botanic Garden

To enrich life through discovery, education, and the conservation of plants and the natural environment.

Environment
11
Texas a&M Research Foundation

To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.

Education
12
Mhs Physicians of Texas

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Houston Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is San Angelo Stock Show & Rodeo Syndicate. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST LUKES UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $1,256,200 · OtherST LUKES UNITED METHODIST CHURCHMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER — $525,000 · OtherMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER+7 more — $147,000 · Other+7 moreChristian Community Service Center Inc — $387,000 · Human ServicesChristian Commu…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $210,000 · HealthTHE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $10,000 · HealthTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC — $170,000 · EducationYES Prep Public Schools Inc — $10,000 · EducationGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $100,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF ODESSA INC — $35,000 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of Greater Houston — $10,000 · PhilanthropySAN ANGELO STOCK SHOW & RODEO SYNDICATE — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentTEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Public Benefit
Other$1,928,200Human Services$387,000Health$220,000Education$180,000Philanthropy$145,000Youth Development$20,000Public Benefit$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetChristian Community Service Center Inc — $387,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $210,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC — $170,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF ODESSA INC — $35,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetSAN ANGELO STOCK SHOW & RODEO SYNDICATE — $20,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetTHE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Way of Greater Houston — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYES Prep Public Schools Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kws Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph