Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kuhl Anna M Scholarship Tuw

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$407k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $36k
$12,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIV OF ST THOMAS FBO$12,000
UNIV OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES FBO$12,000
CONCORDIA UNIV ST PAUL FBO$12,000
UNIV OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES FBO$7,000
UNIV OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES FBO$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%UNIV OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES FBO: $12k → 11%CONCORDIA UNIV ST PAUL FBO: $12k → 14%UNIV OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES FBO: $7k → 11%UNIV OF ST THOMAS FBO: $12k → 14%UNIV OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES FBO: $7k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$219k · 22 repeat orgs$188k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
43

Total granted

$219k
$176k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+2%

Still filing today

32%
2%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CU
    CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY ST PAUL
    2× · 2019–2025 · $14k · revenue +75%
  • MACALESTER COLLEGE
    2× · 2018–2019 · $8k · revenue +74%
  • AU
    AUGSBURG UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2018–2019 · $7k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MENNESOTA
    one grant, 2018 · $24k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
  • UO
    UNIV OF ST THOMAS FBO SERENITY
    one grant, 2024 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
2
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
3
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
4
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
5
Saint John's University

To foster the vitality of community through learning and the pursuit of wisdom.

—
6
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
7
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

—
8
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
9
Luther College

Founded by the norwegian evangelical lutheran church in 1861, luther college is a four-year, residential liberal arts institution. luther welcomes students of all backgrounds to engage in a way of learning that moves beyond immediate…

Education
10
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
11
University of Northwestern - St Paul

See schedule o. founded in 1902, university of northwestern - st. paul is a nondenominational christian university that integrates the educational philosophy of "faith, learning and living" through two focuses: higher education and media.…

Education
12
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of St Thomas; the most unlike its peers is St Catherine University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIV OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES FBO: $74,050 · OtherUNIV OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES FBOUNIVERSITY OF MENNESOTA: $23,600 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MENNESOTAUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES: $19,600 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIESCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY ST PAUL: $14,000 · Other+55 more: $233,750 · Other+55 moreMACALESTER COLLEGE: $7,500 · EducationMACALESTER …AUGSBURG UNIVERSITY: $7,375 · EducationAUGSBURG UN…TRUSTEES OF THE HAMLINE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $7,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF…BETHEL UNIVERSITY: $7,000 · EducationBETHEL UNIV…ST CATHERINE UNIVERSITY: $6,700 · EducationST CATHERIN…University of St Thomas: $5,500 · EducationUniversity …+1 more: $1,000 · Education
Other$365,000Education$42,075

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY ST PAUL: $14,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMACALESTER COLLEGE: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAUGSBURG UNIVERSITY: $7,375 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE HAMLINE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBETHEL UNIVERSITY: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST CATHERINE UNIVERSITY: $6,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of St Thomas: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNorth Central University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY ST PAUL ↗
  • Who funds MACALESTER COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds AUGSBURG UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE HAMLINE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA ↗
  • Who funds BETHEL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ST CATHERINE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of St Thomas ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kuhl Anna M Scholarship Tuw funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kuhl Anna M Scholarship Tuw. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kuhl Anna M Scholarship Tuw’s filings →

    More from the funding graph