Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kt Wielkopolski Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Religion$7kHealth$3kHousing & Shelter$2kFood & Nutrition$2kEducation$1kArts & Culture$1kHuman Services$550Public Safety & Disaster$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$250
Median grant
8
States reached
$70k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Tunnel to Towers$1,000
St JudeChildrens Hospitals$1,000
Harry Chapin Food Bank$500
Catholic faith Appeal$500
St Matthews$500
Diocese of Scranton$500
Habitat for Humanity Central AZ$250
Habitat for Humanity Fl$250
NJIT$250
American Cancer Society$200
Leukemia Lymphoma Society$100
Covenant House$100
Alzheimers Association$100
Individual grant recipient$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $850) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Covenant House: $100 → 17%Wounded Warrior Project: $150 → 14%Covenant House: $100 → 17%Wounded Warrior Project: $150 → 14%Covenant House: $100 → 17%Wounded Warrior Project: $150 → 14%Wounded Warrior Project: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
OR
PA
NJ
VA
AZ
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14k · 13 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
15

Total granted

$14k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+149%

Still filing today

31%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’25
Human ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DO
    Diocese of Scranton
    6× · 2020–2025 · $5k
  • CF
    Catholic faith Appeal
    5× · 2021–2025 · $2k
  • HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $2k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • TB
    THE BOXCAR TOUR FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue ×14
  • QO
    Queen of Peace Chuch
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Covenant House Washington Dc

Covenant house washington, dc ("chw") provides shelter, crisis care, community services, and outreach services to youth in the washington dc area.

Human Services
2
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
3
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
4
Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors Inc

The tragedy assistance program for survivors (taps) is america's national nonprofit organization that has cared for the loved ones of our nation's fallen heroes since 1994. taps ensures these living legacies of service and sacrifice do not…

Health
5
Ch Pennsylvania Under - 21

Our mission is to serve children and youth facing homelessness and human trafficking, and to protect and safeguard all children. we provide trauma-informed interventions for youth who are in need.covenant house pennsylvania (chpa) remains…

Housing & Shelter
6
United States Veterans Initiative

The successful transition of military veterans and their families through the provision of housing, counseling, career development and comprehensive support.

Human Services
7
Veterans Inc

Veterans inc.'s mission is to end homelessness among veterans by helping veterans regain control of their lives. we believe that all veterans have earned respect and gratitude from our nation. this belief is translated into the philosophy…

Community Improvement
8
Covenant House Georgia Inc

Covenant house georgia provides shelters, protects and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, runaway and sexually exploited youth.

—
9
City Rescue Mission Inc

Our mission is to lead our community by serving people experiencing or at risk of homelessness with help, hope, and healing, in the spirit of excellence, under the call of christ.

Human Services
10
Covenant House Texas

Covenant house texas shelters, protects, and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, and sexually exploited youth.

Human Services
11
Shelter House Community Shelter and Transition Services

Through shelter and housing, advocacy and supportive services, our mission is to prevent and end homelessness in our community.

—
12
The Sub Zero Mission

To prevent the freezing and injury caused by extreme weather exposure to the homeless and financially destitute americans.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Covenant House; the most unlike its peers is The Boxcar Tour Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Diocese of Scranton: $5,250 · OtherDiocese of ScrantonCatholic faith Appeal: $2,000 · OtherCatholic faith AppealIndividual grant recipient: $1,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNJIT: $1,250 · OtherNJITSt JudeChildrens Hospitals: $1,000 · OtherSt JudeChildrens HospitalsIndividual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientQueen of Peace Chuch: $1,000 · OtherQueen of Peace ChuchHabitat for Humanity Fl: $750 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY CENTRAL ARIZONA: $750 · Other+15 more: $4,310 · Other+15 moreHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $1,500 · Food & NutritionSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EducationFairleigh Dickinson University: $350 · EducationTHE BOXCAR TOUR FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Arts & CultureWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $550 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE: $300 · Human ServicesST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $500 · Housing & ShelterBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $100 · Health
Other$18,560Food & Nutrition$1,500Education$1,350Arts & Culture$1,000Human Services$850Housing & Shelter$500Health$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $1,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY CENTRAL ARIZONA: $750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $550 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFairleigh Dickinson University: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOXCAR TOUR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CENTRAL ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Fairleigh Dickinson University ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kt Wielkopolski Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kt Wielkopolski Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Fairleigh Dickinson University: 2% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kt Wielkopolski’s filings →

More from the funding graph