Skip to content
Krumrine-Hubbard Charitable Trust Samuel a Gates Ttee at a glance

· Private foundation

Krumrine-Hubbard Charitable Trust Samuel a Gates Ttee

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$63k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$280kEducation$185kReligion$140k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $58k
$14,600
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GUTHRIE MEMORIAL LIBRARY$14,600
ST PAUL'S LUTHERAN CHURCH$14,600
HANOVER HOSPITAL$14,600
VISITING NURSES ASSOCIATION OF HANOVER & SPRING GROVE$14,600
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$2,500
MESSIAH UNIVERSITY$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 5% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%EASTERN UNIVERSITY: $3k → 6%DICKINSON COLLEGE: $3k → 8%GETTYSBURG COLLEGE: $3k → 9%YORK COLLEGE OF PENNSYLVANIA: $3k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $3k → 11%LEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE: $3k → 11%PENN STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 16%TEMPLE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 22%ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $3k → 14%TEXAS AM UNIVERSITY: $3k → 22%RHODES COLLEGE: $3k → 17%BOWDOIN COLLEGE: $3k → 7%GUTHRIE MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $17k → 9%VISITING NURSES ASSOCIATION OF HANOVER & SPRING GROVE: $17k → 9%HANOVER HOSPITAL: $17k → 9%ST PAUL'S LUTHERAN CHURCH: $17k → 9%ST PAUL'S LUTHERAN CHURCH: $17k → 9%VISITING NURSES ASSOCIATION OF HANOVER & SPRING GROVE: $17k → 9%HANOVER HOSPITAL: $17k → 9%GUTHRIE MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $17k → 9%ST PAUL'S LUTHERAN CHURCH: $16k → 9%HANOVER HOSPITAL: $16k → 9%GUTHRIE MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $16k → 9%VISITING NURSES ASSOCIATION OF HANOVER & SPRING GROVE: $16k → 9%ST PAUL'S LUTHERAN CHURCH: $16k → 9%GUTHRIE MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $16k → 9%VISITING NURSES ASSOCIATION OF HANOVER & SPRING GROVE: $16k → 9%HANOVER HOSPITAL: $16k → 9%ST PAUL'S LUTHERAN CHURCH: $15k → 9%VISITING NURSES ASSOCIATION OF HANOVER & SPRING GROVE: $15k → 9%GUTHRIE MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $15k → 9%HANOVER HOSPITAL: $15k → 9%HANOVER HOSPITAL: $15k → 9%GUTHRIE MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $15k → 9%VISITING NURSES ASSOCIATION OF HANOVER & SPRING GROVE: $15k → 9%ST PAUL'S LUTHERAN CHURCH: $15k → 9%ST PAUL'S LUTHERAN CHURCH: $15k → 9%GUTHRIE MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $15k → 9%HANOVER HOSPITAL: $15k → 9%VISITING NURSES ASSOCIATION OF HANOVER & SPRING GROVE: $15k → 9%HANOVER HOSPITAL: $15k → 9%ST PAUL'S LUTHERAN CHURCH: $15k → 9%VISITING NURSES ASSOCIATION OF HANOVER & SPRING GROVE: $15k → 9%GUTHRIE MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $15k → 9%ST PAUL'S LUTHERAN CHURCH: $14k → 9%VISITING NURSES ASSOCIATION OF HANOVER & SPRING GROVE: $14k → 9%HANOVER HOSPITAL: $14k → 9%GUTHRIE MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $14k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$578k · 7 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
10

Total granted

$578k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+39%

Still filing today

71%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UH
    UPMC HANOVER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $140k · revenue +41%
  • VN
    VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF HANOVER & SPRING GROVE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $140k · revenue +5%
  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    3× · 2020–2025 · $8k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • Rochester Institute of Technologygraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +39%
  • DICKINSON COLLEGEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +45%
  • GC
    GETTYSBURG COLLEGE
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
4
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
5
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
6
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
Randolph College Inc

See detailed description of organization's primary mission provided on schedule o

Education
9
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
10
Lycoming College

The mission of lycoming college is to provide a distinguished baccalaureate education in the liberal arts and sciences within a coeducational, supportive, and residential setting.

Education
11
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
12
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gettysburg College; the most unlike its peers is Upmc Hanover. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
12/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GUTHRIE MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $140,180 · OtherGUTHRIE MEMORIAL LIBRARYST PAULS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $140,180 · OtherST PAULS LUTHERAN CHURCHVISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF HANOVER & SPRING GROVE INC: $140,178 · OtherVISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF HANOVER & SPRING GROVE INC+3 more: $7,500 · OtherUPMC HANOVER: $140,180 · HealthUPMC HANOVERUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $7,500 · EducationYORK COLLEGE OF PENNSYLVANIA: $5,000 · EducationTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $5,000 · EducationRochester Institute of Technology: $2,500 · EducationMESSIAH UNIVERSITY: $2,500 · EducationDICKINSON COLLEGE: $2,500 · EducationGETTYSBURG COLLEGE: $2,500 · EducationRhodes College: $2,500 · EducationEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $2,500 · EducationLEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE: $2,500 · EducationBowdoin College: $2,500 · Education
Other$428,038Health$140,180Education$37,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUPMC HANOVER: $140,180 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetVISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF HANOVER & SPRING GROVE INC: $140,178 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYORK COLLEGE OF PENNSYLVANIA: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRochester Institute of Technology: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMESSIAH UNIVERSITY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDICKINSON COLLEGE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGETTYSBURG COLLEGE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRhodes College: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBowdoin College: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Krumrine-Hubbard Charitable Trust Samuel a Gates Ttee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Krumrine-Hubbard Charitable Trust Samuel a Gates Ttee. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Krumrine-Hubbard Charitable Trust Samuel a Gates Ttee?

    Find your warmest path to Krumrine-Hubbard Charitable Trust Samuel a Gates Ttee through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Krumrine-Hubbard Charitable Trust Samuel a Gates Ttee’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home