Skip to content

· Public charity

Kollel Ner Naftali

Kollel Ner Naftalis purpose is to address, educate and coordinate the facilitation of jewish related programs in an effort to further the religious practice of judaism.

$934k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$176k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $432,232, the rows itemized in this filing. The $933,758 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $501,526 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $31k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $387k
$17,003
Median grant
3
States reached
$48k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Yeshiva Giving Fund$175,640
Rekonect$155,450
Rabbi Fischers$55,939
Komah Inc$17,003
Kollel Neir Naftoli 1$14,100
Rabbi Engles$7,500
Ner Gavriel$6,600
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 7% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Rabbi Fischers: $56k → 6%Rabbi Engles: $8k → 14%Ner Gavriel: $7k → 20%Komah Inc: $17k → 14%Yeshiva Giving Fund: $176k → 10%Rekonect: $155k → 10%Kollel Neir Naftoli 1: $14k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $366k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region, $194k to organizations and $172k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Middle East and North Africa$366k · 100% · 1 grant · 30 people

Stated purpose: Financial Assistance

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its field
03the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2020–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2020 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
2/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YESHIVA GIVING FUND INC: $175,640 · ReligionYESHIVA GIVING FUND INCREKONECT: $155,450 · ReligionREKONECTKOLLEL NER NAFTALI: $14,100 · Religion+2 more: $14,100 · ReligionRABBI FISCHERS: $55,939 · OtherRABBI FISCHERSKUMAH INC: $17,003 · OtherKUMAH INC
Religion$359,290Other$72,942

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYESHIVA GIVING FUND INC: $175,640 over 1y, 11% of budgetKOLLEL NER NAFTALI: $14,100 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetRABBI ENGELS: $7,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kollel Ner Naftali?

Find your warmest path to Kollel Ner Naftali through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kollel Ner Naftali’s filings →

More from the funding graph