Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Public charity

Kitchen Table Campaigns

KITCHEN TABLE CAMPAIGNS works to improve public health and well-being throughresearch, analysis, public education and advocacy. The focus of the organization is reducing the environmental factors that contribute to chronic disease and disability in millions of american families. The primary strategy is fostering partnerships between…

$13k
Granted FY2018
1
Itemized grants FY2018
1
Organizations funded FY2018
0%
First-time grantees FY2018
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2018
$10k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2018
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2018
$10,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 4
FY2017 to FY2018
States reached, FY2018
1
Total assets, FY2018
$430k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2018, 0% of the organizations Kitchen Table Campaigns funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20181$10k0%
FY20174$70kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Environment$70kHealth$10k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2018, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Kitchen Table Campaigns with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kitchen Table Campaigns?

Find your warmest path to Kitchen Table Campaigns through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Kitchen Table Campaigns

How much does Kitchen Table Campaigns give?
Kitchen Table Campaigns reported 1 itemized grants totaling $10,000, out of $13,000 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2018 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 4 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2018.
What does Kitchen Table Campaigns fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2018, its largest causes are Environment (88%), Health (13%).
Who are Kitchen Table Campaigns's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2018: Defend Our Health ($40k), Conservation Voters for Idaho Education Fund Inc ($20k), Learning Disabilities Association of America ($10k).
Does Kitchen Table Campaigns fund new organizations?
In FY2018, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Kitchen Table Campaigns?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund.
Where is Kitchen Table Campaigns based?
Kitchen Table Campaigns is based in DC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 4 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2019) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2018, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kitchen Table Campaigns’ filings →

More from the funding graph