Skip to content

· Public charity

Kiss the Ground

Our mission is to awaken the people to the possibilities of regeneration.

$352k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2022.

Environment$945kFood & Nutrition$667k
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 18 grants below total $305,750, the rows itemized in this filing. The $351,750 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $46,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $283k
$15,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LANDERS FAMILY FARM$40,000
KOKES CATTLE COMPANY LLC$35,000
WILD TYPE RANCH LLC$25,000
VETTED FARMS$25,000
ML RANCH LLC$20,000
PT RANCH$20,000
NALWOODI DENZHONE STRENGTH AND BEAUTY COMMUNITY$20,000
PROVENANCE ORGANIC FARM LLC$15,000
MUD RIDGE RANCH LLC$15,000
SQUEEZE CITRUS LLC$15,000
SOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INC$12,000
CENTER FOR AGRICULTURAL RESILIENCE INC$11,000
TERAVANA FOUNDATION LLC$10,000
MACE CHASM FARM LLC$10,000
LIVING PASTURES FARM LLC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SOIL HEALTH ACADEMY: $10k → 11%ML RANCH LLC: $20k → 9%TERAVANA FOUNDATION LLC: $10k → 9%PT RANCH: $20k → 10%REDFORD CENTER: $58k → 10%PROJECT BIOME INC: $459k → 11%SOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INC: $12k → 11%MACE CHASM FARM LLC: $10k → 13%VETTED FARMS: $25k → 15%LANDERS FAMILY FARM: $40k → 17%MUD RIDGE RANCH LLC: $15k → 11%UNDERSTANDING AG LLC: $10k → 16%SOIL HEALTH ACADEMY: $10k → 19%THE PROVENANCE CO REGENERATION MANAGEMENT PARTNERS: $6k → 15%SOIL HEALTH ACADEMY: $860k → 16%WILD TYPE RANCH LLC: $25k → 10%SQUEEZE CITRUS LLC: $15k → 20%CENTER FOR AGRICULTURAL RESILIENCE INC: $11k → 24%KOKES CATTLE COMPANY LLC: $35k → 15%PROVENANCE ORGANIC FARM LLC: $15k → 4%LIVING PASTURES FARM LLC: $10k → 6%NATIONAL BLACK FARMER'S ASSOCIATION: $34k → 19%THE REDFORD CENTER: $7k → 10%PLANET EARTH HOME INC: $174k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 3 repeat orgs$340k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
2

Total granted

$1.6M
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-18%
+64%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 3% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $296k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’25
Food & NutritionEnvironmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SOIL HEALTH ACADEMY
    3× · 2019–2025 · $880k · revenue -86% · 53% of their budget
  • PB
    PROJECT BIOME INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $633k · revenue +123% · 85% of their budget
  • RC
    REDFORD CENTER INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $65k · revenue -18%

Funded once

  • NB
    NATIONAL BLACK FARMERS ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $34k · revenue +64%
  • UA
    UNDERSTANDING AG LLC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sustainable Farming Association of Minnesota

Support the development and enhancement of sustainable farming systems through farmer-to-farmer networking, innovation, demonstration, and education.

Food & Nutrition
2
Noble Research Institute Llc

To guide farmers and ranchers in applying regenerative principles that yield healthier soil, more productive grazing land, and business success. (see schedule o)

Education
3
American Farmland Trust

Saves the land that sustains us by protecting farmland, promoting sound farming practices, and keeping farmers on the land.

Food & Nutrition
4
Rodale Institute

Rodale institute is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit dedicated to advancing regenerative organic agriculture through rigorous research, farmer training and education. for more than seventy-five years, rodale institute has been researching best…

Food & Nutrition
5
Ag Technology and Environmental Stewardship Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
6
Trees for the Future Inc

Our mission is to improve the livelihoods of impoverished farmers by revitalizing degraded lands.

Environment
7
Sustainable Growers
—
8
Natural State Ltd

Through large-scale restoration and rewilding, natural state secures biodiversity, sequesters and stores carbon, and helps achieve the sustainable development goals. natural state is helping restore and rewild a minimum of 1,000,000 acres.

Environment
9
Building Carbon

Through community partnerships in ecuador, building carbon scales up regenerative agroforestry through farmer training and advances the state of the art of bamboo building technology through r&d. we are built on partnerships and…

Environment
10
Marbleseed Inc

Marbleseed educates, inspires, and empowers farmers to thrive in a sustainable, organic system of agriculture.

Health
11
Western Sustainability Exchange

Advancing sustainability in the western area of the united states through a series of programs and activities designed to promote better ranching practices. a strong focus is to provide ranchers with the information, tools, technical…

Environment
12
National Corn Growers Association Foundation

Advance the interests of us corn farmers through research and education.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Soul Fire Farm Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is Redford Center Inc dba the Redford Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOIL HEALTH ACADEMY: $879,750 · EnvironmentSOIL HEALTH ACADEMYREDFORD CENTER INC: $65,035 · EnvironmentREDFORD CENTER INC+1 more: $7,000 · EnvironmentPROJECT BIOME INC: $632,869 · Food & NutritionPROJECT BIOME INCNATIONAL BLACK FARMERS ASSOCIATION: $34,000 · Food & Nutrition+2 more: $23,000 · Food & NutritionLANDERS FAMILY FARM: $40,000 · OtherLANDERS FAMILY …KOKES CATTLE COMPANY LLC: $35,000 · OtherKOKES CATTLE CO…VETTED FARMS: $25,000 · OtherVETTED FARMSWILD TYPE RANCH LLC: $25,000 · OtherWILD TYPE RANCH…ML RANCH LLC: $20,000 · OtherML RANCH LLCPT Ranch: $20,000 · OtherPT RanchMUD RIDGE RANCH LLC: $15,000 · OtherMUD RIDGE RANCH…PROVENANCE ORGANIC FARM LLC: $15,000 · OtherPROVENANCE ORGA…SQUEEZE CITRUS LLC: $15,000 · OtherSQUEEZE CITRUS …LIVING PASTURES FARM LLC: $10,000 · OtherMACE CHASM FALLS LLC: $10,000 · OtherTERAVANA TRUST F/K/A WELLKIND TRUST: $10,000 · OtherUNDERSTANDING AG LLC: $9,900 · Other+1 more: $6,000 · OtherNALWOODI DENZHONE STRENGTH AND BEAUTY COMMUNITY: $20,000 · Health
Environment$951,785Food & Nutrition$689,869Other$255,900Health$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOIL HEALTH ACADEMY: $879,750 over 3y, 53% of budgetPROJECT BIOME INC: $632,869 over 2y, 85% of budgetREDFORD CENTER INC: $65,035 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL BLACK FARMERS ASSOCIATION: $34,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetCENTER FOR AGRICULTURAL RESILIENCE: $11,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetTERAVANA TRUST F/K/A WELLKIND TRUST: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOIL HEALTH ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT BIOME INC ↗
  • Who funds REDFORD CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL BLACK FARMERS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NALWOODI DENZHONE STRENGTH AND BEAUTY COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds SOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR AGRICULTURAL RESILIENCE ↗
  • Who funds TERAVANA TRUST F/K/A WELLKIND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds WHITE BUFFALO LAND TRUST ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kiss the Ground funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kiss the Ground. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kiss the Ground’s filings →

    More from the funding graph