Skip to content

Wisconsin · Private foundation

Kirsten and Emily Maki Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
7
Grants FY2025
6
Organizations funded FY2024
50%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$10,000
Organizations funded a year
6 to 13
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$548k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 50% of the organizations Kirsten and Emily Maki Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 40% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthFood & NutritionPhilanthropyReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving7$48k43%
FY20246$40k50%
FY20238$65k50%
FY20227$41k57%
FY20216$38k33%
FY20206$19k67%
FY20199$28k67%
FY201813$41k38%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$131kHealth$67kEducation$56kReligion$52kHousing & Shelter$12kFood & Nutrition$10kArts & Culture$9kEnvironment$8kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MI
IN
CA
AZ
DC
HI
GA
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Covenant Presbyterian Church$29,0005n/a
Focus on Community Inc$27,00082%
Citizens United for Research in Epilepsy$16,00030%
Homeless Assistance Leadership Organization Inc$12,00040%
Santa Cause Inc$10,00013%
Siena Catholic Schools of Racine Inc$10,0001n/a
Maui Food Bank Inc$10,00010%
Eco-Justice Center Inc$8,00022%
Red Bird Foundation$6,00023%
The George Washington University$6,00020%
Show all 22 grantees
All grantees of Kirsten and Emily Maki Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Covenant Presbyterian Church$29,0005n/a
Focus on Community Inc$27,00082%
Citizens United for Research in Epilepsy$16,00030%
Homeless Assistance Leadership Organization Inc$12,00040%
Santa Cause Inc$10,00013%
Siena Catholic Schools of Racine Inc$10,0001n/a
Maui Food Bank Inc$10,00010%
Eco-Justice Center Inc$8,00022%
Red Bird Foundation$6,00023%
The George Washington University$6,00020%
Racine Arts Council Inc$6,00026%
Stars and Stripes Honor Flight Inc$5,0001n/a
St Monica's Senior Living Inc$3,00010%
American Cancer Society Inc$3,00010%
St Baldrick's Foundation Inc$3,00010%
Lutheran High School$3,0001n/a
Alpha Chi Omega Foundation Inc$3,00010%
Cursillo in Christianity of the Arc Hdiocese of Milwaukee$3,0001n/a
Beleaf Survivors Inc$3,00011%
St Mary by the Lake$2,5001n/a
The Prairie School Inc$95010%
DeKoven Center Inc$5010%

Plus 21 recipients with no EIN on record ($183k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Kirsten and Emily Maki Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFocus on Community Inc: $27,000 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetCitizens United for Research in Epilepsy: $16,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHomeless Assistance Leadership Organization Inc: $12,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSanta Cause Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetMaui Food Bank Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEco-Justice Center Inc: $8,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetRed Bird Foundation: $6,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetThe George Washington University: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRacine Arts Council Inc: $6,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetSt Monica's Senior Living Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Cancer Society Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSt Baldrick's Foundation Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlpha Chi Omega Foundation Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBeleaf Survivors Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetThe Prairie School Inc: $950 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDeKoven Center Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 16.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Racine Community Foundation IncWI24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Racine Community Foundation Inc · Lang Family Foundation Inc · Ascension All Saints Hospital Foundation Inc · United Way of Racine County Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · AbbVie Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Kirsten and Emily Maki Foundation with peer funders

About Kirsten and Emily Maki Foundation

How much does Kirsten and Emily Maki Foundation give?
Kirsten and Emily Maki Foundation reported 7 grants totaling $48,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 6 and 13 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Kirsten and Emily Maki Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Human Services (37%), Health (19%), Education (16%).
Who are Kirsten and Emily Maki Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Covenant Presbyterian Church ($29k), Focus on Community Inc ($27k), Citizens United for Research in Epilepsy ($16k).
Does Kirsten and Emily Maki Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 50% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Kirsten and Emily Maki Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Kirsten and Emily Maki Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Racine Community Foundation Inc, Lang Family Foundation Inc, Ascension All Saints Hospital Foundation Inc.
Where is Kirsten and Emily Maki Foundation based?
Kirsten and Emily Maki Foundation is based in WI.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kirsten and Emily Maki’s filings →

More from the funding graph