Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kirk Elizabeth - YMCA Et Al

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$70k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Religion$162kHealth$89kArts & Culture$45kScience & Tech$31kYouth Development$30kPublic Benefit$14kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $23k
$7,806
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF WATERBURY$23,418
HARTFORD HEALTHCARE AT HOME INC$7,808
CONGREGATIONAL BOARD PILGRIM MEMORIAL FD$7,806
WATERBURY WOMEN'S CLUB$7,806
YMCA - YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION$7,806
CJR - CONNECTICUT JUNIOR REPUBLIC FUND$7,806
CONNECTICUT NURSES ASSOCIATION$7,806
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

None of its grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$402k · 11 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
0

Total granted

$402k
$0

Still filing today

27%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HH
    Hartford HealthCare at Home Inc
    6× · 2019–2024 · $45k · revenue +73%
  • CN
    CONNECTICUT NURSES' ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $45k · revenue +2%
  • WW
    Waterbury Women's Club Inc
    6× · 2019–2024 · $45k · revenue +97% · 74% of their budget

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    1
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    3/3
    Grantees still filing
    3/3
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    FIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF WATERBURY: $91,368 · OtherFIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF WATERBURYWaterbury Women's Club Inc: $44,654 · OtherWaterbury Women's Club IncFIRST CONG CHURCH OF WATERBURY: $42,577 · OtherFIRST CONG CHURCH OF WATERBURYIndividual grant recipient: $30,925 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCONG BOARD PILGRIM MEM FUND: $30,925 · OtherCONG BOARD PILGRIM MEM FUNDYMCA - YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $30,459 · OtherYMCA - YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIONYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOC: $14,195 · OtherCJR - CONNECTICUT JUNIOR REPUBLIC FUND: $13,729 · OtherCONGREGATIONAL BOARD PILGRIM MEMORIAL FD: $13,729 · OtherHartford HealthCare at Home Inc: $44,656 · HealthHartford HealthCare at Ho…CONNECTICUT NURSES' ASSOCIATION: $44,654 · HealthCONNECTICUT NURSES' ASSOC…
    Other$312,561Health$89,310

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHartford HealthCare at Home Inc: $44,656 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT NURSES' ASSOCIATION: $44,654 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetWaterbury Women's Club Inc: $44,654 over 6y, 74% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds Hartford HealthCare at Home Inc ↗
    • Who funds CONNECTICUT NURSES' ASSOCIATION ↗
    • Who funds Waterbury Women's Club Inc ↗

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Kirk Elizabeth - YMCA Et Al funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kirk Elizabeth - YMCA Et Al. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 20%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      2get no government money at all
      1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Kirk Elizabeth - YMCA Et Al’s filings →

      More from the funding graph