Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kenneth E & Becky H Johnson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$38k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$266kReligion$180kRecreation & Sports$75kScience & Tech$40kHuman Services$18kInternational$13kEnvironment$5kCrime & Legal$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $26k
$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints$16,000
Brigham Young University$10,000
ASU-Sun Devil Athletics$6,760
Academy of Community Partners$2,500
Music & The Message$2,000
Vetdrenalene LLC$500
Heritage Academy$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CHILDHELP: $100 → 11%CHILDHELP: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$550k · 14 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
9

Total granted

$550k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+26%

Still filing today

21%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Public BenefitPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationCrime & LegalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FAMILY FIRST FOUNDATION
    3× · 2019–2022 · $17k · revenue +491% · 26% of their budget
  • MW
    Mesa West Rotary Foundation Inc
    2× · 2019–2021 · $13k · revenue +1%
  • JUDICIAL WATCH INC
    3× · 2019–2022 · $3k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • CO
    CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT
    one grant, 2021 · $44k
  • A
    ASU
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • SC
    SERTOMA CLUB OF AZ
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Childrens International Rescue Foundation

Counter human trafficking operations law enforcement training and trafficking survivor support.

Crime & Legal
2
Get Kids Outside

Get kids into National Park

Youth Development
3
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
4
Lead the Way Fund Inc

Army ranger lead the way fund is an active duty, casualty assistance, recovery, transition and veterans organization that provides financial support to u.s. army rangers and the families of those who have died, have been disabled or who…

Human Services
5
Flowing Wells Jrotc Association Attn Bobby Edwards

Preparing high school students for responsible leadership roles while making them aware of their rights, responsibilities, and privileges as american citizens.

Education
6
Hostage Aid Worldwide Inc

Hostage aid's mission is to assist hostages and unlawful detainees and their families by providing insights on their cases and coordination with governments & un bodies, as well as strategies to disrupt the hostage business model and the…

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Southern Arizona Justice for Veterans

SAJV financially supports the Regional Municipalities Veterans Treatment Court. The Court is largely funded by a Federal SAMHSA grant mostly providing medical and other treatment for veteran clients with smaller amounts funding the Courts…

Crime & Legal
8
Project Dynamo Inc

To deploy personnel and resources to global flashpoints where the us government has little to no formal diplomatic and military presence, either refused to conduct evacuations of us persons, allies, or vulnerable populations or where those…

International
9
Aha Foundation Inc

Aha foundation is committed to preserving, protecting, and promoting liberal freedoms and ideals.

International
10
Watch

Watch's mission is to make the justice system more effective and responsive in handling cases of domestic violence and juvenile sex trafficking, to improve outcomes for women and children who have been victimized, and to create a more…

—
11
World Heritage Air Museum

We restore cold war era military jet aircraft for exhibition.

—
12
Federation for American Immigration Reform

The federation for american immigration reform's (fair) mission is to educate the public about the economic, sociological, environmental, demographic and other effects of mass immigration to the united states.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Vetdrenaline Llc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS: $180,319 · OtherTHE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTSBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY: $109,000 · OtherBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient: $82,954 · OtherIndividual grant recipientASU-SUN DEVIL ATHLETICS: $72,840 · OtherASU-SUN DEVIL ATHLETICSCORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT: $43,845 · OtherCORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENTBYU-DEPT OF MICROBIOLOGYMOLECULAR BIOLOGY: $40,496 · OtherBYU-DEPT OF MICROBIOLOGYMOLECULAR BIOLOGY+12 more: $56,654 · Other+12 moreMesa West Rotary Foundation Inc: $12,500 · PhilanthropyJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $2,500 · Public BenefitTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $125 · Public BenefitTHE VOICE FOR 1: $2,000 · Crime & LegalCENTER FOR ARIZONA POLICY INC: $1,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $500 · EducationCHILDHELP INC: $1,100 · Human ServicesRed Mountain Youth Rugby Inc: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentVetdrenaline LLC: $500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$586,108Philanthropy$12,500Public Benefit$2,625Crime & Legal$2,000Education$1,500Human Services$1,100Youth Development$1,000Recreation & Sports$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAMILY FIRST FOUNDATION: $17,000 over 3y, 26% of budgetMesa West Rotary Foundation Inc: $12,500 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDHELP INC: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR ARIZONA POLICY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FAMILY FIRST FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Mesa West Rotary Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE VOICE FOR 1 ↗
  • Who funds CHILDHELP INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR ARIZONA POLICY INC ↗
  • Who funds Red Mountain Youth Rugby Inc ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kenneth E & Becky H Johnson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kenneth E & Becky H Johnson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kenneth E & Becky H Johnson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph