· Private foundation
Keller-Shatanoff Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $80k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DOROT | $100,000 |
| CAMP KINDER RING - BUILDING FUND | $20,000 |
| CHAI LIFELINE | $20,000 |
| Birthright Israel Foundation | $20,000 |
| FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH OF ISRAE | $10,000 |
| MEOR FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| GUARDIANS OF THE SICK INC | $5,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $675k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 3% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
14 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- DIDOROT INC8× · 2017–2024 · $640k · revenue +35%
- CKCamp Kinder Ring7× · 2017–2023 · $160k · revenue +79%
- CLCHAI LIFELINE INC8× · 2017–2024 · $160k · revenue +58%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $10k
- TSTHE SIMON WEISENTHAL CENTERone grant, 2018 · $3k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.
To enhance jewish education for children in israel by developing advanced educational methods, focusing on the building of personal relationships with the students to ensure that the needs of each individual are met. every child can be…
Young judaea is a diverse community that educates and empowers jewish youth to deeply engage with israel and to lead positive change for the jewish people, israel and the world.
Connect israel is a life-long program that aims to strengthen the gap between american jews and israelis through business, creative teamwork, and developing personal relationships.
To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…
The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.
To educate, enrich and empower visually impaired people across israel to achieve their full potential and become contributing members of society.
How this is measured
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DOROT INC ↗
- Who funds Camp Kinder Ring ↗
- Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗
- Who funds MEOR INC ↗
- Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds New York University ↗
- Who funds GUARDIANS OF THE SICK INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF ORANGE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds JUILLIARD SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds ALL 4 ISRAEL INC ↗
- Who funds THE JEWISH GUILD FOR THE BLIND ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.
Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Keller-Shatanoff Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Keller-Shatanoff Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Keller-Shatanoff Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Keller-Shatanoff Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Keller-Shatanoff’s filings →